Show simple item record

Regret And Undoing: Retrospective Assessment Of Hypothetical And Real Life Events (decision, Emotion, Cognition).

dc.contributor.authorLandman, Janet Tracy
dc.date.accessioned2016-08-30T16:35:40Z
dc.date.available2016-08-30T16:35:40Z
dc.date.issued1984
dc.identifier.urihttp://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&res_dat=xri:pqm&rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:8422274
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/127669
dc.description.abstractThis investigation, arising from within the cognitive tradition instigated by Festinger and renewed by Kahneman and Tversky, includes conceptual and empirical analyses of regret and undoing. I wanted to know how people think and feel about hypothetical and real life experiences, how they imagine possible alternative experiences, and how their thoughts about the past relate to characteristics of the events and to personal characteristics. To examine these questions, I carried out a set of experimental studies, a set of survey studies, and a conceptual analysis. The conceptual analysis consists of semantic and theoretical explications of regret and undoing, and differentiation of these concepts from similar concepts, namely, remorse, guilt, and shame. The purpose of the experimental studies was to determine which general classes of events (acts versus failures to act, negative versus positive outcomes, usual versus unusual acts, foreseeable versus unforeseeable events) are most often mentally undone. Subjects read written vignettes in which the nature of the antecedent events was varied. Subjects were asked either to (a) imagine the intensity of the emotional reaction of a target person or to (b) undo the outcome by imagining alternative antecedent events. The principal results of these experiments indicate that: (1) given the same regretted outcome, people imagine regretting acts more than failures to act; (2) likewise, given a happy outcome, people imagine feeling better about antecedent acts than failures to act, though this effect is less pronounced than the parallel effect for negative outcomes; (3) antecedent events with a causal, foreseeable connection to the outcome are undone more often than elements not foreseeable related to the outcome; (4) unusual antecedent events are undone more often than usual ones. The purpose of the survey study was to examine the incidence and content of mental undoing of real life events in groups of undergraduates and older adults. The results of this study indicate that: (1) undoing is a common mental activity in undergraduates and older adults; (2) females show a greater incidence of undoing thoughts than males, particularly in life domains considered stereotypically feminine (e.g., family); and (3) this sex difference disappears when occupational and educational situation is held constant across gender.
dc.format.extent262 p.
dc.languageEnglish
dc.language.isoEN
dc.subjectAssessment
dc.subjectCognition
dc.subjectDecision
dc.subjectEmotion
dc.subjectEvents
dc.subjectHypothetical
dc.subjectLife
dc.subjectReal
dc.subjectRegret
dc.subjectRetrospective
dc.subjectUndoing
dc.titleRegret And Undoing: Retrospective Assessment Of Hypothetical And Real Life Events (decision, Emotion, Cognition).
dc.typeThesis
dc.description.thesisdegreenamePhDen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreedisciplinePsychology
dc.description.thesisdegreedisciplineSocial psychology
dc.description.thesisdegreegrantorUniversity of Michigan, Horace H. Rackham School of Graduate Studies
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/127669/2/8422274.pdf
dc.owningcollnameDissertations and Theses (Ph.D. and Master's)


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.