Show simple item record

An Evaluation Of Three Urban Riverfront Parks: Lessons For Designers (waterfront Assessment, Environmental).

dc.contributor.authorBeebe, Katherine Ford
dc.date.accessioned2016-08-30T16:35:47Z
dc.date.available2016-08-30T16:35:47Z
dc.date.issued1984
dc.identifier.urihttp://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&res_dat=xri:pqm&rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:8422367
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/127676
dc.description.abstractIn recent years, downtown revitalization plans in cities located on waterfronts frequently included reclamation of the waterfront as a major element in their renewal. Typically, the waterfront is redeveloped as a major public recreational amenity designed to attract people from throughout the metropolitan area. Waterfront improvements are funded by public program dollars and represent a substantial investment of resources to the reclamation of the waterfront as a vehicle for city renewal. This study examines how redeveloped urban riverfront parks function and, from a systematic evaluation of their use, provides information which can contribute to the improved design of future urban riverfront parks. Specific objectives of the study are: (1) to determine the extent to which design program goals for urban riverfront parks are being met, and to discover the unanticipated uses of the parks; (2) to develop an understanding of the use of places commonly incorporated in the park design (the amphitheater, river's edge, lawn, and vendors area); and (3) to suggest how these findings might contribute to the design of future urban riverfront parks. Riverfront parks in Detroit, Lansing, and Flint, Michigan were selected for this study. Following interviews with park designers, city administrators, and civic leaders, document review, and site visits, park design program goals were identified. The extent to which these goals were achieved was assessed with data collected through interviews with 384 park visitors and behavioral observations during 12 different time periods on event and non-event days. The data analysis indicates that while the parks substantially meet their program objectives, there are areas needing more attention. The use of the amphitheater, the river's edge, lawn, and vendors areas pointed to problems in their location as well as design. Lessons learned are directed to policy-makers as well as designers and apply to overall park design as well as to the four selected places.
dc.format.extent321 p.
dc.languageEnglish
dc.language.isoEN
dc.subjectAssessment
dc.subjectDesigners
dc.subjectEnvironmental
dc.subjectEvaluation
dc.subjectLessons
dc.subjectParks
dc.subjectRiverfront
dc.subjectThree
dc.subjectUrban
dc.subjectWaterfront
dc.titleAn Evaluation Of Three Urban Riverfront Parks: Lessons For Designers (waterfront Assessment, Environmental).
dc.typeThesis
dc.description.thesisdegreenameArch.Dr.
dc.description.thesisdegreedisciplineArchitecture
dc.description.thesisdegreedisciplineCommunication and the Arts
dc.description.thesisdegreegrantorUniversity of Michigan, Horace H. Rackham School of Graduate Studies
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/127676/2/8422367.pdf
dc.owningcollnameDissertations and Theses (Ph.D. and Master's)


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.