Show simple item record

Dynamics Of The Lake Michigan Deep Chlorophyll Layer (phytoplankton, Sedimentation, Primary Production, Zooplankton, Growth).

dc.contributor.authorFahnenstiel, Gary Lee
dc.date.accessioned2016-08-30T16:38:52Z
dc.date.available2016-08-30T16:38:52Z
dc.date.issued1986
dc.identifier.urihttp://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&res_dat=xri:pqm&rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:8612513
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/127855
dc.description.abstractAn investigation of the Lake Michigan deep chlorophyll layer (DCL) was conducted in 1982-1984 using a variety of field, laboratory, and computer simulation procedures. The DCL was a seasonal feature, developing after the onset of thermal stratification and continuing into mid-stratification (July-August). The layer initially formed in the 15 to 30 m region and deepened to the 25 to 50 m region in July and the 40 to 70 m region in August. Chlorophyll concentrations in the DCL averaged 1.75x and 5.70x epilimnetic concentrations in June and July-August, respectively. These higher DCL chlorophyll concentrations were attributable to two factors; decreased epilimnetic chlorophyll concentrations and shade adaptation within the DCL. In contrast to the epilimnetic community, phytoplankton carbon concentrations in the DCL remained relatively constant. The roles of various growth and loss processes in maintaining phytoplankton concentrations within the DCL were evaluated. In situ growth, controlled by the interaction of light and nutrients, was the primary process maintaining phytoplankton concentrations within the DCL. An average of 30% of water column production occurred within the DCL and growth rates were as high as 0.3 day('-1). During early stratification, diatoms, sinking from the surface waters, accumulated in the DCL. However, the importance of sedimentation as a net source of phytoplankton to the DCL was small in comparison to in situ growth. By the period of mid-stratification, sedimentation resulted in a loss of phytoplankton from the layer. Phytoplankton sinking was more important as a factor regulating the depth of the DCL. In July 1984, in situ growth was found to balance plytoplankton losses due to sinking and crustacean grazing. Methods of measuring in situ production in the DCL were compared and evaluated. Generally, ('14)C primary production estimates that considered the vertical movements caused by internal waves were not significantly different than standard, fixed-depth production estimates. Results from short (1-2 hr) and long (24 hr) ('14)C incubations were compared to independent estimates of phytoplankton growth obtained from changes in phytoplankton carbon. Short-term experiments extrapolated to daily rates provided a measure between net and gross production and long-term ('14)C experiments provided a measure close to net production.
dc.format.extent186 p.
dc.languageEnglish
dc.language.isoEN
dc.subjectChlorophyll
dc.subjectDeep
dc.subjectDynamics
dc.subjectGrowth
dc.subjectLake
dc.subjectLayer
dc.subjectMichigan
dc.subjectPhytoplankton
dc.subjectPrimary
dc.subjectProduction
dc.subjectSedimentation
dc.subjectZooplankton
dc.titleDynamics Of The Lake Michigan Deep Chlorophyll Layer (phytoplankton, Sedimentation, Primary Production, Zooplankton, Growth).
dc.typeThesis
dc.description.thesisdegreenamePhDen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreedisciplineBiological Sciences
dc.description.thesisdegreedisciplineLimnology
dc.description.thesisdegreegrantorUniversity of Michigan, Horace H. Rackham School of Graduate Studies
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/127855/2/8612513.pdf
dc.owningcollnameDissertations and Theses (Ph.D. and Master's)


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.