Show simple item record

Autoradiographic Characterization Of L-(tritium)glutamate Binding Sites In The Central Nervous System (receptors, Nmda, Kainate, Quisqualate).

dc.contributor.authorGreenamyre, John Timothy
dc.date.accessioned2016-08-30T16:38:58Z
dc.date.available2016-08-30T16:38:58Z
dc.date.issued1986
dc.identifier.urihttp://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&res_dat=xri:pqm&rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:8612528
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/127860
dc.description.abstractA quantitative autoradiographic technique was developed to study L- ('3)H glutamate binding in sections of central nervous system tissue. This technique circumvented some problems associated with conventional receptor binding methodologies and allowed direct assessment of regional distribution, numbers and affinities of glutamate binding sites. The sensitivity and high degree of anatomical resolution attainable by autoradiography obviated the need for pooled samples of microdissected specimens. Under assay conditons, ('3)H glutamate bound rapidly and reversibly to sections of rat brain and was not metabolized appreciably. The distribution of glutamate binding sites corresponded to the projection areas of putative glutamatergic pathways. Thus, there was heavy glutamate binding in regions where there is evidence for glutamatergic innervation and little binding in nuclei which apparently do not receive glutamatergic input. Scatchard and Hill plots suggested that glutamate was interacting with a single population of sites; however, competition studies revealed binding site heterogeneity. One population of sites was sensitive to N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) and other compounds specific for the NMDA receptor. This site was enriched in stratum radiatum of hippocampus (CA1) and represented a variable portion of glutamate binding sites elsewhere in the brain. A second population of sites had a high affinity for quisqualate. These sites were unevenly distributed and in the cerebellar molecular layer represented approximately 80% of glutamate binding sites. The number of high affinity quisqualate sites increased in the presence of chloride and calcium ions. A subset of high affinity quisqualate sites was sensitive to kainate, particularly in stratum lucidum of hippocampus (CA3). The density of the kainate-sensitive sites was decreased by calcium but not chloride ions. At high concentrations, quisqualate competed for all glutamate binding sites. There was a good correspondence between the density and distribution of low affinity quisqualate sites and NMDA-sensitive sites and pharmacological analysis suggested that these sites were equivalent. Anatomical and pharmacological evidence suggested that the NMDA-, high affinity quisqualate-, and kainate-sensitive glutamate binding sites may correspond to physiologically-defined NMDA, quisqualate and kainate receptors.
dc.format.extent133 p.
dc.languageEnglish
dc.language.isoEN
dc.subjectAutoradiographic
dc.subjectBinding
dc.subjectCentral
dc.subjectCharacterization
dc.subjectGlutamate
dc.subjectKainate
dc.subjectNervous
dc.subjectNmda
dc.subjectQuisqualate
dc.subjectReceptors
dc.subjectSites
dc.subjectSystem
dc.subjectTritium
dc.titleAutoradiographic Characterization Of L-(tritium)glutamate Binding Sites In The Central Nervous System (receptors, Nmda, Kainate, Quisqualate).
dc.typeThesis
dc.description.thesisdegreenamePhDen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreedisciplineBiological Sciences
dc.description.thesisdegreedisciplineNeurosciences
dc.description.thesisdegreegrantorUniversity of Michigan, Horace H. Rackham School of Graduate Studies
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/127860/2/8612528.pdf
dc.owningcollnameDissertations and Theses (Ph.D. and Master's)


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.