Show simple item record

Sexual Selection, Mate Choice And Gregarine Parasite Levels In The Field Crickets Gryllus Veletis And G. Pennsylvanicus (insect Behavior, Female).

dc.contributor.authorZuk, Marlene
dc.date.accessioned2016-08-30T16:40:15Z
dc.date.available2016-08-30T16:40:15Z
dc.date.issued1986
dc.identifier.urihttp://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&res_dat=xri:pqm&rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:8621406
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/127937
dc.description.abstractMate choice in polygynous species where males contribute little besides sperm to their offspring is of interest to evolutionary biologists, because the basis for such choice is often obscure and its adaptive significance, if any, controversial. I studied mate choice in the field crickets Gryllus veletis and G. pennsylvanicus (Orthoptera: Gryllidae) to determine the effects of male size, age, calling behavior and gregarine parasite levels on male mating success. I focused on the relation between parasites and sexual selection because recent work by Hamilton and Zuk suggests that the coevolution between host and pathogen provides a mechanism for genetic quality-based female choice and the evolution of sexually dimorphic characters. The number of females a male attracted was significantly correlated only with his age, and not with gregarine load, body size, or calling duration. Gregarine load was, however, negatively correlated with the number of spermatophores a male produced in 24-32 hours, and because females produce more eggs when multiply inseminated, males producing several spermatophores are expected to sire more offspring than males producing single spermatophores. Spermatophore production was unrelated to male size or age, but peaked in the laboratory in the early morning, coincident with peaks in mating and courtship song observed in the field. Comparison of field-collected males found with females to males found calling by themselves revealed that the paired males were significantly older and less parasitized than solitary males. Gregarines were common in both cricket species, with 30-70% of all individuals examined found to be infected. G. veletis males were more heavily infected than females; in G. pennsylvanicus the sexes were equally infected. The frequency of infected individuals fluctuated through the season. In crickets fed ad libitum, gregarine infection did not affect adult longevity, weight change or fecundity; food-deprived infected crickets lived fewer days and lost more weight than uninfected crickets. Development of nymphs was slower in crickets found to harbor gregarines at adult molt. These results suggest that female Gryllus may be making an adaptive mate choice, and that debilitating parasites may be important in sexual selection and more general aspects of cricket biology.
dc.format.extent158 p.
dc.languageEnglish
dc.language.isoEN
dc.subjectBehavior
dc.subjectChoice
dc.subjectCrickets
dc.subjectFemale
dc.subjectField
dc.subjectGregarine
dc.subjectGryllus
dc.subjectInsect
dc.subjectLevels
dc.subjectMate
dc.subjectParasite
dc.subjectPennsylvanicus
dc.subjectSelection
dc.subjectSexual
dc.subjectVeletis
dc.titleSexual Selection, Mate Choice And Gregarine Parasite Levels In The Field Crickets Gryllus Veletis And G. Pennsylvanicus (insect Behavior, Female).
dc.typeThesis
dc.description.thesisdegreenamePhDen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreedisciplineBiological Sciences
dc.description.thesisdegreedisciplineBiology
dc.description.thesisdegreegrantorUniversity of Michigan, Horace H. Rackham School of Graduate Studies
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/127937/2/8621406.pdf
dc.owningcollnameDissertations and Theses (Ph.D. and Master's)


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.