Show simple item record

Change in the career goals and attitudes of undergraduates: A longitudinal panel study of the University of Michigan Class of 1983.

dc.contributor.authorSprik, Jeanette Fay
dc.contributor.advisorCave, William M.
dc.contributor.advisorWalz, Garry R.
dc.date.accessioned2016-08-30T16:47:33Z
dc.date.available2016-08-30T16:47:33Z
dc.date.issued1989
dc.identifier.urihttp://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&res_dat=xri:pqm&rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:8920619
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/128345
dc.description.abstractThe main objective of this longitudinal research study was to determine the extent and nature of freshman to senior change in students' career goals and attitudes. The three lines of inquiry included: (1) change in students, (2) the impact of change on occupational fields, and (3) the influence of gender and parents on change. The subjects of the two-wave panel survey were a random sample of 500 undergraduates from The University of Michigan Class of 1983. Data were drawn from the students' responses to the same survey instrument at two time points (winter term of freshman year, 1980, N = 290, and winter term of senior year, 1983, N = 207). The matching of freshmen and senior questionnaires resulted in a final panel of 186 students (49% males and 51% females). Findings of the study indicated that less change than expected occurred in students' career goals and attitudes during the undergraduate years. A greater proportion of women than men (1) changed in all areas of educational and occupational goals except plans for additional education, (2) changed to occupational fields that are similar to their initial primary choices, (3) moved into gender-neutral fields, and (4) left gender-appropriate fields. There were, however, no statistically significant gender differences in the extent or nature of change in students' career goals or attitudes. Counterintuitively, change in students' occupational goals involved more turnover and occupational segregation for gender-neutral fields than for female-dominant fields. As expected, stability, rather than change, in students' occupational goals was related to parental influence. Students were less likely to change their occupational preference when their freshman preference was similar to their parents' preference for them than when it was dissimilar. This relationship was stronger for males than for females and stronger for secondary than for primary choice. Major implications of the study include: (1) parents, educators, and the public need to systematically encourage the entry of more women into male-dominant occupations and the open examination of career goals and attitudes by both male and female undergraduates; (2) higher education should systematically encourage students to explore their career related attitudes in light of the larger challenges facing our global community; and (3) a third wave of panel data gathered a few years following graduation could address the role of the undergraduate years in change of career goals and attitudes overtime.
dc.format.extent333 p.
dc.languageEnglish
dc.language.isoEN
dc.subjectAttitudes
dc.subjectCareer
dc.subjectChange
dc.subjectClass
dc.subjectGoals
dc.subjectLongitudinal
dc.subjectMichigan
dc.subjectOf
dc.subjectPanel
dc.subjectStudy
dc.subjectUndergraduates
dc.subjectUniversity
dc.titleChange in the career goals and attitudes of undergraduates: A longitudinal panel study of the University of Michigan Class of 1983.
dc.typeThesis
dc.description.thesisdegreenamePhDen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreedisciplineEducation
dc.description.thesisdegreedisciplineHigher education
dc.description.thesisdegreedisciplineSchool counseling
dc.description.thesisdegreegrantorUniversity of Michigan, Horace H. Rackham School of Graduate Studies
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/128345/2/8920619.pdf
dc.owningcollnameDissertations and Theses (Ph.D. and Master's)


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.