Show simple item record

'Space to Speke': Confessional practice and the construction of character in the works of Geoffrey Chaucer, Guillaume de Machaut, and Juan Ruiz.

dc.contributor.authorRoot, Jerry
dc.contributor.advisorWilliams, Ralph G.
dc.date.accessioned2016-08-30T16:52:00Z
dc.date.available2016-08-30T16:52:00Z
dc.date.issued1990
dc.identifier.urihttp://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&res_dat=xri:pqm&rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:9034501
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/128590
dc.description.abstractThe dissertation examines the construction of the subject in medieval literature at the archeological level, that is, as Foucault would have it, at the level of what made it possible. The obligatory confessional practice that develops after the Fourth Lateran Council creates, authorizes, and codifies a space for self-presentation. Using both traditional institutional history and the type of archival reconstruction of discursive formations associated with Foucault, I argue that this new space transforms the possibilities for the construction of the literary subject. Part One explores the development of the discursive formation of confession. I illustrate that Augustine's Confessions corresponds to the practice of early public penance, but Augustine's self-presentation does not provide a model for medieval confessional practice or for the confessional self-presentations of fourteenth-century literature. In Abelard's Ethics, I find evidence of the shift toward the formalization of the confessional subject. Yet, the Historia calamitatum, illustrates the continued predominance of self-justification based on an outward show of penitential satisfaction. In the vernacular manuals that appear after 1215, I discover a concentrated and uniform effort to codify the confessional subject. I show how this codification makes available and maps out a space to speke of the self and of inner dispositions. Part Two examines the way this new space to speke makes possible a discourse of the self in major literary texts of the fourteenth century. I find a major preoccupation with confession in the works of Geoffrey Chaucer. Particularly in the Wife of Bath's Prologue, the confessional authorization to speak justifies a self-presentation based on private experience. In Guillaume de Machaut's Livre du Voir Dit confession proves to be the only language adequate to the production of an inner truth of the self. In Juan Ruiz's Libro de Buen Amor, the discourse of confession permits the author-persona to maintain a didactic attitude while narrating his own scandalous experience in love. These literary self-presentations illustrate the extent to which confession has become the privileged language for the representation of the self and for the construction of literary character in the fourteenth century.
dc.format.extent288 p.
dc.languageEnglish
dc.language.isoEN
dc.subjectCharacter
dc.subjectChaucer
dc.subjectConfessional
dc.subjectConstruction
dc.subjectDe
dc.subjectGeoffrey
dc.subjectGuillaume
dc.subjectMachaut
dc.subjectPractice
dc.subjectRuiz, Juan
dc.subjectSpace
dc.subjectSpeke
dc.subjectTo
dc.subjectWorks
dc.title'Space to Speke': Confessional practice and the construction of character in the works of Geoffrey Chaucer, Guillaume de Machaut, and Juan Ruiz.
dc.typeThesis
dc.description.thesisdegreenamePhDen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreedisciplineComparative literature
dc.description.thesisdegreedisciplineLanguage, Literature and Linguistics
dc.description.thesisdegreedisciplineMedieval history
dc.description.thesisdegreedisciplineMedieval literature
dc.description.thesisdegreedisciplineSocial Sciences
dc.description.thesisdegreegrantorUniversity of Michigan, Horace H. Rackham School of Graduate Studies
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/128590/2/9034501.pdf
dc.owningcollnameDissertations and Theses (Ph.D. and Master's)


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.