Show simple item record

Understanding, predicting, and influencing recycling behavior: The future generation.

dc.contributor.authorGoldenhar, Linda M.
dc.contributor.advisorTakeshita, Yuzuru
dc.contributor.advisorPeterson, Christopher
dc.date.accessioned2016-08-30T16:53:49Z
dc.date.available2016-08-30T16:53:49Z
dc.date.issued1991
dc.identifier.urihttp://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&res_dat=xri:pqm&rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:9124011
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/128685
dc.description.abstractIn light of the current waste crisis, it is critical that we begin attempts to influence attitudes, beliefs, and behaviors regarding waste recycling. In the first study, a decision-making model, the Theory of Reasoned Action (TRA), was tested to explain recycling behavior. The TRA purports that behavior can be explained directly by behavioral intentions and indirectly by attitudes and beliefs about the behavioral act. The second study incorporated two types of interventions (educational and feedback) developed to modify recycling attitudes, beliefs, and behavioral intentions and thereby enhance recycling behavior. A questionnaire comprising the concepts of the Theory of Reasoned Action (TRA) was administered to 4,682 first-year students at The University of Michigan. Baseline data were gathered from 3,706 out of 4,682 students (80% response rate). Of those 3,706 students, 1,604 students also completed the follow-up questionnaire (34% response rate overall). Using a quasi-experimental design, eight residence halls were matched on size and randomly assigned to one of four intervention conditions (two halls per group): (1) recycling education, (2) feedback about recycling behavior, (3) education plus feedback, or (4) control. The intervention period lasted 5 months. A path analytic technique used in the first study indicated that the TRA was useful in explaining self-reported recycling behavior. The respondent's rated importance of recycling compared to other social issues mediated the relationship between attitudes, beliefs, and behavioral intentions. To evaluate the data from the second study, a multiple comparison using an a priori Scheffe' procedure was used. Results showed that there were no significant group differences in terms of the students' attitudes, beliefs, rated importance, recycling knowledge, or behavioral intentions. Students receiving monthly feedback pertaining to the amount of material recycled in their residence, however, reported participating in recycling to a greater degree than those receiving only the educational intervention or nothing at all (p $<$.001). Overall, findings from the two studies suggest that there is a relationship between an individual's recycling attitudes, beliefs, and behavior. In addition, feedback and educational intervention strategies appear useful in enhancing recycling behavior.
dc.format.extent93 p.
dc.languageEnglish
dc.language.isoEN
dc.subjectBehavior Modification
dc.subjectFeedback
dc.subjectFuture
dc.subjectGeneration
dc.subjectInfluencing
dc.subjectIntervention
dc.subjectPredicting
dc.subjectReasoned Action
dc.subjectRecycling
dc.subjectUnderstanding
dc.titleUnderstanding, predicting, and influencing recycling behavior: The future generation.
dc.typeThesis
dc.description.thesisdegreenamePhDen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreedisciplineEnvironmental science
dc.description.thesisdegreedisciplineHealth Sciences, Education
dc.description.thesisdegreedisciplineHealth and Environmental Sciences
dc.description.thesisdegreedisciplinePublic health
dc.description.thesisdegreegrantorUniversity of Michigan, Horace H. Rackham School of Graduate Studies
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/128685/2/9124011.pdf
dc.owningcollnameDissertations and Theses (Ph.D. and Master's)


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.