Show simple item record

Factors affecting job satisfaction in secondary school teachers in Michigan.

dc.contributor.authorEvers, Tsila Barner
dc.contributor.advisorMenlo, Allen
dc.contributor.advisorTice, Terrence N.
dc.date.accessioned2016-08-30T16:57:24Z
dc.date.available2016-08-30T16:57:24Z
dc.date.issued1992
dc.identifier.urihttp://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&res_dat=xri:pqm&rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:9226889
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/128875
dc.description.abstractThis study examined the overall job satisfaction of teachers in eleven high schools in Michigan and the specific factors that contribute to it. One hundred and eighty teachers participated in the study. Twenty of them participated in the interviews. The instruments consisted of a self-administered survey questionnaire and a semi-structured interview. Two methods of analysis were used: a quantitative analysis of the questionnaire and a qualitative analysis of the interviews. Those two methods were compared in an attempt to illuminate the nature of job satisfaction. The operationalization of overall job satisfaction was done through the use of four measurements of satisfaction and one composite scale. Overall job satisfaction was the dependent variable. Work conditions, teachers' roles, teaching practices, work role centrality, stress and demographics served as independent variables. Influence of specific factors on satisfaction was examined through Pearson correlations and stepwise multiple regressions of the survey and a thematic analysis of the interviews. Differences between stayers and potential leavers were examined using Student t tests and Chi-square tests of Independence. The first part of the interview consisted of 16 items from the questionnaire selected for in-depth analysis. Each item was followed by funnel questions. The second part asked teachers to identify their three biggest satisfiers and dissatisfiers, replicating Herzberg's Critical Incident method. Analysis of the questionnaire indicated there were seven statistically significant factors influencing overall satisfaction: support from parents, students and the community, stress, participation in curriculum development, freedom to do the work, work-role-centrality, physical surrounding and pay. Demographics did not play a significant role, though educational level and school location influenced some aspects of job satisfaction. In the interviews teachers mentioned six contributors. These were: students, challenge of teaching, intellectual growth, administrators, colleagues and stress. There were interesting differences between stayers and potential leavers. Stayers had higher satisfaction scores, less stress, and more seniority. They perceived work conditions more favorably but did not differ from leavers in terms of the extent of roles and responsibilities undertaken.
dc.format.extent241 p.
dc.languageEnglish
dc.language.isoEN
dc.subjectAffecting
dc.subjectFactors
dc.subjectJob
dc.subjectMichigan
dc.subjectSatisfaction
dc.subjectSchool
dc.subjectSecondary
dc.subjectTeacher Stress
dc.subjectTeachers
dc.titleFactors affecting job satisfaction in secondary school teachers in Michigan.
dc.typeThesis
dc.description.thesisdegreenamePhDen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreedisciplineEducation
dc.description.thesisdegreedisciplineEducational administration
dc.description.thesisdegreedisciplineEducational psychology
dc.description.thesisdegreedisciplineOccupational psychology
dc.description.thesisdegreedisciplinePsychology
dc.description.thesisdegreedisciplineSchool counseling
dc.description.thesisdegreegrantorUniversity of Michigan, Horace H. Rackham School of Graduate Studies
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/128875/2/9226889.pdf
dc.owningcollnameDissertations and Theses (Ph.D. and Master's)


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.