Show simple item record

The values of the academy: An examination of the values of faculty in higher education in the United States.

dc.contributor.authorMoore, Steven G. W.
dc.contributor.advisorBerlin, Lawrence
dc.date.accessioned2016-08-30T16:58:35Z
dc.date.available2016-08-30T16:58:35Z
dc.date.issued1992
dc.identifier.urihttp://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&res_dat=xri:pqm&rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:9303790
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/128940
dc.description.abstractMost studies of faculty values and faculty activities have focused on extrinsic values (such as political values) or faculty activities and faculty work (such as research, teaching, and governance). The aim of this study is to examine and identify the dominant values, the changing values, and the emerging values held by selected faculty in higher education. The research of this study incorporates an extensive review of the literature and interviews of faculty. Four national faculty and twelve faculty from three liberal arts institutions participated in a dialogue about the values of the academy. The dialogue was framed in the context of three broad categories drawn from a review of literature of values, faculty, and student impact in higher education. Categories framing the discussion are: how faculty makes sense of their lives; the individual, corporate, and institutional value commitments at work in the academy; and the perceived emerging tensions and value concerns of faculty in higher education. Those values emerging from the faculty interviews and the literature review were identified in two sets: value affirmations and value tensions. The affirmations represent values broadly held in higher education. The tensions represent values about which there is disagreement, divergent opinions, or considerable debate. The study identifies seven value affirmations and thirteen values in tension. Affirmations include: the necessity of the public review, scrutiny and testing of ideas; the reality of the incompleteness of what is known; that most faculty make sense of their world through solidarity; and the value of the development of that which is aesthetically beautiful, culturally enriching, and critically examined. Faculty participating in the study reported a deficient dialogue about the values of the academy compounded by an academic discourse which has become highly politicized. As well, tensions surrounding the pursuit of truth, modes of learning, issues surrounding the core; the corporatizing of the academy; and other challenges to traditionally held values of the academy are discussed. The study concludes with reflections on the contrasting sense among faculty of solemnness and despair on the one hand and a sense of devotion and commitment on the other. A call is given for a renewed sense of commitment to reclaim the dialogue and discourse which have provided the framework for the formation of the academy's values.
dc.format.extent337 p.
dc.languageEnglish
dc.language.isoEN
dc.subjectAcademy
dc.subjectEducation
dc.subjectExamination
dc.subjectFaculty Values
dc.subjectHigher
dc.subjectStates
dc.subjectUnited
dc.titleThe values of the academy: An examination of the values of faculty in higher education in the United States.
dc.typeThesis
dc.description.thesisdegreenamePhDen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreedisciplineCurriculum development
dc.description.thesisdegreedisciplineEducation
dc.description.thesisdegreedisciplineHigher education
dc.description.thesisdegreegrantorUniversity of Michigan, Horace H. Rackham School of Graduate Studies
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/128940/2/9303790.pdf
dc.owningcollnameDissertations and Theses (Ph.D. and Master's)


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.