Show simple item record

Mother-daughter relationships and adult daughters' commitment to caregiving for their aging disabled mothers.

dc.contributor.authorPohl, Joanne Margaret
dc.contributor.advisorBoyd, Carol J.
dc.date.accessioned2016-08-30T17:00:20Z
dc.date.available2016-08-30T17:00:20Z
dc.date.issued1992
dc.identifier.urihttp://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&res_dat=xri:pqm&rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:9308423
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/129026
dc.description.abstractThis investigation examined the relationship between mother-daughter attachment, mother-daughter conflict, mothers' level of disability and adult daughters' commitment to caregive for their disabled mothers for the first time. In addition, employment and living arrangements were hypothesized as mediating variables in the equation. The theoretical framework was based on Rogers' model of unitary human beings, feminist theory, and family caregiving research. Both cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses as well as quantitative and qualitative methods were utilized. Ninety-eight daughters caring for their mothers were identified from a larger sample of first time family caregivers. Data were collected from an initial screening interview, a Wave 1 interview within one month after screening, and a Wave 2 interview 3 months after the Wave 1 interview. In addition, eight daughters participated in a qualitative interview approximately one year into caregiving. Cross-sectional findings at Wave 1 using a path analysis model, indicated that mother-daughter relationships (attachment and conflict), predicted daughters' affective commitment to caregiving (positive and negative beliefs about caregiving), while mothers' level of disability and mother-daughter attachment predicted instrumental commitment (number of hours of direct and supervisory care). Living arrangements functioned as a mediator in the model while employment did not. Employment had a direct effect on both instrumental and affective commitment. Wave 2 path analysis findings were limited due to a drop in the number of cases, although the trend of the results mirrored Wave 1 findings. Longitudinal findings indicated that mother-daughter attachment and conflict remained stable during the transition to caregiving. Logistic regressions were used to predict three patient caregiving outcomes: (1) no longer requires care; (2) remains in care; and (3) died. Supervisory care, not direct care, was found to predict the odds of remaining in care and dying versus improving at Wave 2. Magnitude of mothers' limitation at Wave 1 was negatively related to mother improving at Wave 2. Finally, qualitative interviews supported and augmented quantitative findings especially those regarding living arrangements and the onerous responsibilities of supervisory care; they also enriched data on mother-daughter relationships during the transition to caregiving.
dc.format.extent224 p.
dc.languageEnglish
dc.language.isoEN
dc.subjectAdult
dc.subjectAging
dc.subjectCaregiving
dc.subjectCommitment
dc.subjectDaughter Caregiver
dc.subjectDaughters
dc.subjectDisabled
dc.subjectMother
dc.subjectMothers
dc.subjectRelationships
dc.titleMother-daughter relationships and adult daughters' commitment to caregiving for their aging disabled mothers.
dc.typeThesis
dc.description.thesisdegreenamePhDen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreedisciplineGerontology
dc.description.thesisdegreedisciplineHealth and Environmental Sciences
dc.description.thesisdegreedisciplineNursing
dc.description.thesisdegreedisciplineSocial Sciences
dc.description.thesisdegreedisciplineWomen's studies
dc.description.thesisdegreegrantorUniversity of Michigan, Horace H. Rackham School of Graduate Studies
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/129026/2/9308423.pdf
dc.owningcollnameDissertations and Theses (Ph.D. and Master's)


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.