Show simple item record

Discerning spirits: Sanctity and possession in the later Middle Ages. (Volumes I and II).

dc.contributor.authorCaciola, Nancy
dc.contributor.advisorHughes, Diane Owen
dc.date.accessioned2016-08-30T17:08:08Z
dc.date.available2016-08-30T17:08:08Z
dc.date.issued1994
dc.identifier.urihttp://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&res_dat=xri:pqm&rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:9513310
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/129427
dc.description.abstractDiscerning Spirits: Sanctity and Possession in the Later Middle Ages examines the responses of different cultural strata to spirit possession from the mid-twelfth through the fifteenth century in Western Europe. I argue that in Medieval Europe spirit possession was ambiguous: malignly, it was expressed as diabolic possession, while benignly it appeared as unitive mysticism. While only the former was described as spirit possession within medieval culture, unitive mystics, with their stress on the indwelling quality of their experience of God, may also be considered possessed--by the Holy Spirit. Indeed, so closely parallel were mystics and demoniacs considered to be, contemporaries had difficulty discerning one from the other. As a result, a great deal of suspicion and anxiety surrounded the vocations of unitive mystics, who often were accused of being demonically inspired. Adding to this perplexity were general ideas about body and spirit that pervaded medieval culture. Although the civilization of the Middle Ages is often thought of as dualistic in its conceptions of body and spirit, my work shows that the boundaries between the two actually were quite fluid. Spirits were conceived as having a material basis, and conversely the body, in certain areas, was thought to have a basic spiritual vitality. Tales of corpses coming back to life, and folkloric ideas about shamanistic spirit journeys, reveal a broad cultural preoccupation both with the ways in which bodies and spirits acted independently, and with the ways they interacted. By the fifteenth century, the juxtaposition between the divinely and the demonically possessed had begun to elicit responses: new demonological treatises, manuals of exorcism, and a textual tradition devoted to the discernment of spirits. Yet, the attempt to discern spirits on a purely abstract plane was doomed to failure: ultimately, one could only evaluate exterior signs of comportment, since visions and revelations were private and hence unverifiable. Thus the discernment of spirits eventually was worked out as a discernment of the body: judging the comportment and physical control of the individual became paramount. Sanctity was increasingly associated with incorporeality, while possession became defined by a connection with fallen physicality.
dc.format.extent433 p.
dc.languageEnglish
dc.language.isoEN
dc.subjectAges
dc.subjectDiscerning
dc.subjectIi
dc.subjectLater
dc.subjectMiddle
dc.subjectPossession
dc.subjectSanctity
dc.subjectSpirits
dc.subjectVolumes
dc.titleDiscerning spirits: Sanctity and possession in the later Middle Ages. (Volumes I and II).
dc.typeThesis
dc.description.thesisdegreenamePhDen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreedisciplineFolklore
dc.description.thesisdegreedisciplineMedieval history
dc.description.thesisdegreedisciplinePhilosophy, Religion and Theology
dc.description.thesisdegreedisciplineReligious history
dc.description.thesisdegreedisciplineSocial Sciences
dc.description.thesisdegreegrantorUniversity of Michigan, Horace H. Rackham School of Graduate Studies
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/129427/2/9513310.pdf
dc.owningcollnameDissertations and Theses (Ph.D. and Master's)


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.