Show simple item record

Development of an expert assistant for archival appraisal of electronic communications: An exploratory study.

dc.contributor.authorGilliland-Swetland, Anne Jervois
dc.contributor.advisorJanes, Joseph
dc.date.accessioned2016-08-30T17:11:49Z
dc.date.available2016-08-30T17:11:49Z
dc.date.issued1995
dc.identifier.urihttp://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&res_dat=xri:pqm&rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:9542845
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/129609
dc.description.abstractThis exploratory study examined: (1) the extent to which archival appraisal theory and practices that developed primarily in response to the demands of paper-based media, might be codifiable and also might need to be enhanced to meet the challenges of the digital environment; (2) how expert systems technology, interfacing with digital communications architectures, and based on archival appraisal theory and practices, might be used to implement a responsible solution for the electronic records management problems posed by electronic mail (such as high volume, inconsistency in item-level appraisal judgments, institutional security, and personal privacy); and (3) the potential for using appraisal approaches for more general information filtering in a variety of environments faced with digital information overload. Using a three-phased approach, the researcher first conducted a citation analysis of archival literature in order to identify experts in archival appraisal. Secondly, through a knowledge acquisition process involving the participation of identified experts, the researcher delineated existing archival appraisal theory and practices. Thirdly, using a codification based on this delineation, the researcher developed and tested a prototype expert system that could assist archivists in academic institutional settings with the macro-appraisal of electronic mail. The results of this research point out important structural and policy limitations to such an approach that are based around the current state of electronic mail technology and its local implementations, as well as the limitations of archival appraisal as currently expressed. The results also indicate, however, how powerful both archival appraisal and expert systems technology can be when used in combination to manage not only the information but the evidence contained on electronic mail systems. Such an approach opens up important opportunities for the expansion of archival roles in the digital age to encompass not only managing institutional risk; managing information; and identifying, preserving, and transmitting cultural heritage; but also documenting changes in social interaction due to digital technology, mining digital information assets, and harvesting knowledge.
dc.format.extent256 p.
dc.languageEnglish
dc.language.isoEN
dc.subjectAppraisal
dc.subjectArchival
dc.subjectAssistant
dc.subjectCommunicationexploratory
dc.subjectCommunications
dc.subjectDevelopment
dc.subjectElectronic
dc.subjectExpert Systems
dc.subjectExploratory
dc.subjectRecords Management
dc.subjectStudy
dc.titleDevelopment of an expert assistant for archival appraisal of electronic communications: An exploratory study.
dc.typeThesis
dc.description.thesisdegreenamePhDen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreedisciplineCommunication and the Arts
dc.description.thesisdegreedisciplineInformation science
dc.description.thesisdegreegrantorUniversity of Michigan, Horace H. Rackham School of Graduate Studies
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/129609/2/9542845.pdf
dc.owningcollnameDissertations and Theses (Ph.D. and Master's)


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.