Show simple item record

Financial ratio analysis: A financial comparison of Michigan K-12 school districts.

dc.contributor.authorKaumeyer, David Lee
dc.contributor.advisorKearney, C. Philip
dc.date.accessioned2016-08-30T17:17:42Z
dc.date.available2016-08-30T17:17:42Z
dc.date.issued1996
dc.identifier.urihttp://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&res_dat=xri:pqm&rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:9711909
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/129926
dc.description.abstractThe State of Michigan completely overhauled its method of financing public schools effective with the 1994-95 school year. As a result of the funding changes, local property tax is no longer the primary funding source for public schools. Such changes demonstrate the dynamic nature of the education industry. This study was conducted in an effort to encourage practicing school business officials to begin using financial ratios as part of their routine analyses and to provide them with a worksheet to facilitate the use of ratios. District officials are encouraged to calculate their district's ratios and compare them to the state average for the purpose of assessing relative fiscal standing. This study examined various contextual classifications of school districts to determine whether or not certain groups of districts may further benefit by extending their analyses to include comparisons with others in the same classification. Only liquidity and equity position ratios were used in this study because they were readily calculated, applicable to schools and important indicators of financial condition. Michigan's 524 K-12 school districts were included in this study. Districts were classified and analyzed on the basis of contextual variables such as geographic location (4 groups), enrollment (2 groups), community type (5 groups) and state equalized value per pupil (4 groups). The five liquidity position ratios were analyzed separately from the five equity position ratios. MANOVA, ANOVA and Fisher LSD tests were used to assess differences in ratio values among the groups within each contextual classification. A separate analysis was conducted for each contextual classification. The results, which were intended to be more descriptive than prescriptive, indicated that some groups of school districts exhibited consistently different liquidity and equity position ratios than all others. Rural districts, tri-county districts, highest quartile of sev/pupil districts and large districts (enrollment above 2,400 students) showed consistently different ratio values than other groups within their respective classifications. These types of districts may benefit from comparisons with other districts in the same classification. A worksheet is presented to assist practitioners in making assessments of relative fiscal standing.
dc.format.extent149 p.
dc.languageEnglish
dc.language.isoEN
dc.subjectAnalysis
dc.subjectComparison
dc.subjectDistricts
dc.subjectFinancial
dc.subjectMichigan
dc.subjectRatio
dc.subjectSchool
dc.titleFinancial ratio analysis: A financial comparison of Michigan K-12 school districts.
dc.typeThesis
dc.description.thesisdegreenameDoctor of Education (EdD)en_US
dc.description.thesisdegreedisciplineAccounting
dc.description.thesisdegreedisciplineEducation
dc.description.thesisdegreedisciplineEducation finance
dc.description.thesisdegreedisciplineEducational administration
dc.description.thesisdegreedisciplineSocial Sciences
dc.description.thesisdegreegrantorUniversity of Michigan, Horace H. Rackham School of Graduate Studies
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/129926/2/9711909.pdf
dc.owningcollnameDissertations and Theses (Ph.D. and Master's)


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.