Exposure assessment for a study of acute respiratory effects of machining fluid aerosols.
Abrams, Lori
1996
Abstract
Various components of machining fluids have been associated with acute airways dysfunction, but the nature and magnitude of these relationships are not completely understood. This work describes an exposure assessment for a study of machining fluid aerosols and acute changes in pulmonary function. The specific objectives were to: (1) obtain indices of personal exposure to machining fluid aerosols in an automotive transmission plant, either directly (by sampling) or indirectly (by estimation), (2) characterize sources of exposure misclassification and adjust for them, where possible, and (3) provide personal exposure data with which to explore the relationship between exposure and respiratory impairment. No prior studies have characterized personal exposures to machining fluid aerosols so extensively. Exposure data were obtained during three principal rounds of data collection over a fifteen month period in conjunction with spirometric testing of 131 subjects. Subjects worked in one of two machining departments, Case and Valve Body, or in a comparison department, Final Assembly. The primary exposure measures for this study were thoracic fraction particulate, thoracic fraction bacteria (viable and non-viable), and total endotoxin. In addition, we collected personal samples of vapor phase nicotine (VPN) to estimate and adjust for the proportion of ambient tobacco smoke in personal thoracic particulate measures. Mean personal air concentrations of thoracic particulate across all study rounds were 0.13 mg/m$\sp3$ in Final Assembly, 0.32 mg/m$\sp3$ in Valve Body, and 0.56 mg/m$\sp3$ in Case. Average personal exposures to thoracic fraction bacteria were 0.38 bacteria/cc in Final Assembly, 0.87 bacteria/cc in Valve Body, and 2.66 bacteria/cc in Case. Average personal endotoxin measurements (Round 3 only) were 16.4 endotoxin units (EU)/m$\sp3$ in Assembly, 34.7 Eu/m$\sp3$ in Valve Body, and 234 Eu/m$\sp3$ in Case. Sump fluid contained on the order of $10\sp8$ bacteria/ml, and $10\sp4{-}10\sp5$ EU/ml. Since direct quantification of bacterial exposures is costly and time-consuming, mathematical models were developed to estimate personal bacterial concentrations. Generalized estimating equations (GEE) were extremely useful for developing and validating predictive models with correlated (i.e., repeated measures) exposure data. The results demonstrate that it is possible to predict personal levels of airborne bacteria from other measures, including: (1) thoracic particulate concentration, (2) concentration of bacteria in sump fluid, (3) percentage of tramp oil and non-tramp oil in sump fluid, (4) area bacterial concentration, (5) group and individual average exposures, (6) area temperature/humidity, and (7) time and location variables. In exposure-response models, thoracic bacteria measures predicted declines in FEV$\sb1$ and FVC more consistently and significantly than thoracic particulate. These results strongly suggest that bacteria (or bacterial products) play a role in the causation of respiratory dysfunction. In addition, VPN was significantly associated with cross-shift pulmonary function decrements among non- and ex-smokers, indicating a detrimental effect of passive smoking. We conclude that statistical models proved an effective means of estimating personal bacterial exposures in a metalworking environment. Recommendations for future exposure monitoring, control strategies, and exposure assessment studies are presented.Subjects
Acute Aerosols Assessment Effects Exposure Fluid Machining Respiratory Study
Types
Thesis
Metadata
Show full item recordCollections
Remediation of Harmful Language
The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.
Accessibility
If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.