Show simple item record

Psychological implications of social structure: Meanings of social class background in college-educated women's lives.

dc.contributor.authorOstrove, Joan Marcia
dc.contributor.advisorStewart, Abigail J.
dc.date.accessioned2016-08-30T17:20:40Z
dc.date.available2016-08-30T17:20:40Z
dc.date.issued1996
dc.identifier.urihttp://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&res_dat=xri:pqm&rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:9712054
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/130086
dc.description.abstractThis dissertation explores the psychological meaning of social class background in the lives of women who graduated from college in the mid- to late-1960s. Social class background was expected to influence individuals' assumptions, values, and world views even in adulthood. Women from the Radcliffe College Class of 1964, the Smith College Class of 1964, and the University of Michigan Class of 1967 were the participants in this study. Effects of social class background were assessed in the domains of personality traits and motives, and in four other specific contexts: childhood peer relationships, college experiences, work, and marriage. In general, there were very few effects of class background in personality traits, although women who were raised middle-class tended to be seen as judging themselves and others in conventional terms. Women from upper-class backgrounds scored highest on the need for power in 1990, but there were no class background differences in power motive scores in 1960. There were significant effects of social class background in all four of the other contexts. Women from working-class backgrounds reported more experiences of alienation in their childhood peer relationships and in their experiences at college. Also in the college context, women from working-class backgrounds were most likely to describe college as an opportunity for social mobility, while women from upper-class backgrounds were most likely to describe their attendance at college as expected of them and as a continuation of a family tradition. In the work domain, women from working-class backgrounds were most concerned with the economic aspects of work, women from middle-class backgrounds were most concerned with the mastery and lifestyle opportunities at work, and women from upper-class backgrounds were most likely to describe reasons for not participating in the paid labor force such as adequate financial resources and their own and others' lack of expectation for paid employment. Finally, in the marriage domain, women from working-class backgrounds scored highest on a measure of the importance of reciprocity in marriage. These results suggest both that class background, as distinct from current class membership, continues to exert a psychological effect into adulthood, and that position in the class system is associated with both psychological strengths and constraints.
dc.format.extent134 p.
dc.languageEnglish
dc.language.isoEN
dc.subjectBackground
dc.subjectClass
dc.subjectCollege
dc.subjectEducated
dc.subjectImplications
dc.subjectLives
dc.subjectMeanings
dc.subjectPsychological
dc.subjectSocial
dc.subjectStructure
dc.subjectWomen
dc.titlePsychological implications of social structure: Meanings of social class background in college-educated women's lives.
dc.typeThesis
dc.description.thesisdegreenamePhDen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreedisciplinePersonality psychology
dc.description.thesisdegreedisciplinePsychology
dc.description.thesisdegreedisciplineSocial Sciences
dc.description.thesisdegreedisciplineSocial psychology
dc.description.thesisdegreedisciplineWomen's studies
dc.description.thesisdegreegrantorUniversity of Michigan, Horace H. Rackham School of Graduate Studies
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/130086/2/9712054.pdf
dc.owningcollnameDissertations and Theses (Ph.D. and Master's)


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.