Show simple item record

Issues in self-regulated learning: Metacognition, conditional knowledge and the regulation of motivation.

dc.contributor.authorWolters, Christopher Albert
dc.contributor.advisorPintrich, Paul R.
dc.date.accessioned2016-08-30T17:22:05Z
dc.date.available2016-08-30T17:22:05Z
dc.date.issued1996
dc.identifier.urihttp://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&res_dat=xri:pqm&rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:9712124
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/130163
dc.description.abstractA multiple manuscript format composed of three related pieces was used in this dissertation to examine three issues related to self-regulated learning. The first manuscript presented a theoretical discussion of the relation between metacognitive knowledge and four processes related to self-regulated learning, self-efficacy, goal orientation, monitoring and regulation. This discussion highlighted the role of metacognitive knowledge in understanding self-regulated learning. The second manuscript was an empirical study of conditional knowledge and its relation to junior high school students' cognitive and regulatory strategy use, and classroom achievement. The goal of this study was to examine whether conditional knowledge was an important predictor of strategy use and performance in a group of junior high school students ($N=379$). Students completed self-report measures assessing conditional knowledge and strategy use, whereas achievement was assessed based on teacher reported grades. Results indicated that conditional knowledge, operationalized as the endorsement of effective strategies and the rejection of ineffective strategies, was a positive predictor of cognitive and regulatory strategy use in English, mathematics and social studies. The third manuscript examined college-age students' regulation of motivation in their introductory psychology course. The goal of this study was to identify and describe a range of strategies that students ($N=115$) might use to regulate their academic motivation, and to relate this regulation to cognitive strategy use and achievement. Regulation of motivation was assessed in two ways. One, students reported what they would do in 12 hypothetical situations if they wanted to sustain motivation. Two, students completed a self-report survey which included items asking directly about their regulation of motivation. As a group, students described a variety of strategies directed at maintaining motivational levels. In addition, results indicated that students' regulation of intrinsic motivation assessed using both methodologies was positively related to the use of some cognitive and regulatory strategies, but not to course grades. Conclusions from all three manuscripts were related to the existing work on self-regulated learning, and areas of further research were identified.
dc.format.extent158 p.
dc.languageEnglish
dc.language.isoEN
dc.subjectConditional
dc.subjectIssues
dc.subjectKnowledge
dc.subjectLearning
dc.subjectMetacognition
dc.subjectMotivation
dc.subjectRegulated
dc.subjectRegulation
dc.subjectRegulationmotivation
dc.subjectSelf
dc.titleIssues in self-regulated learning: Metacognition, conditional knowledge and the regulation of motivation.
dc.typeThesis
dc.description.thesisdegreenamePhDen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreedisciplineCognitive psychology
dc.description.thesisdegreedisciplineEducation
dc.description.thesisdegreedisciplineEducational psychology
dc.description.thesisdegreedisciplinePsychology
dc.description.thesisdegreegrantorUniversity of Michigan, Horace H. Rackham School of Graduate Studies
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/130163/2/9712124.pdf
dc.owningcollnameDissertations and Theses (Ph.D. and Master's)


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.