Power, autonomy, and adaptation: The reorganization of Russia's ministries, 1985-1995.
dc.contributor.author | Manjikian, Mary Beth | |
dc.contributor.advisor | Zimmerman, William | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2016-08-30T17:29:02Z | |
dc.date.available | 2016-08-30T17:29:02Z | |
dc.date.issued | 1997 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&res_dat=xri:pqm&rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:9732132 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/130531 | |
dc.description.abstract | This dissertation considers the reorganization which has occurred in Russia's ministries since 1985 and argues that Russia's ministries are in some instances significant actors in Russian politics today. However, there is no single pattern for describing Russian ministerial behavior in the post-Soviet period. Rather, Russia's ministries differ greatly in terms of the amount of power and autonomy which they enjoy. In the first section, I develop a number of indicators for measuring autonomy and present a typology. This typology organizes the ministries according to the differing amounts of autonomy which they presently enjoy vis-a-vis the legislature, the presidency, and the other organs of the executive branch. The rest of the dissertation seeks to explain the puzzle presented in section one, by asking, What resources or strategies have allowed some ministries to gain so much more autonomy than others in the new Russia? Using organization theory, I argue that just as successful corporations have been those which have 're-engineered' themselves to cope with a changing environment where old strategies are no longer effective, the most successful Russian ministries have been those which re-engineered themselves. Using case-study methodology, interviews with ministerial personnel, and newspaper articles, I show that re-engineering involves changing an organization's defined mission, its standard operating procedures, its organizational culture, and sometimes its leadership. In the conclusion to this dissertation, I comment on the relevance of these findings for understanding bureaucratic reorganization in comparative politics in general and in newly democratizing nations in particular. | |
dc.format.extent | 314 p. | |
dc.language | English | |
dc.language.iso | EN | |
dc.subject | Adaptation | |
dc.subject | Autonomy | |
dc.subject | Ministries | |
dc.subject | Power | |
dc.subject | Reorganization | |
dc.subject | Russia | |
dc.title | Power, autonomy, and adaptation: The reorganization of Russia's ministries, 1985-1995. | |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.description.thesisdegreename | PhD | en_US |
dc.description.thesisdegreediscipline | Political science | |
dc.description.thesisdegreediscipline | Social Sciences | |
dc.description.thesisdegreegrantor | University of Michigan, Horace H. Rackham School of Graduate Studies | |
dc.description.bitstreamurl | http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/130531/2/9732132.pdf | |
dc.owningcollname | Dissertations and Theses (Ph.D. and Master's) |
Files in this item
Remediation of Harmful Language
The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.
Accessibility
If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.