Show simple item record

Quality management for the postsecondary classroom.

dc.contributor.authorPurdue, Homer Herschel
dc.contributor.advisorStark, Joan S.
dc.date.accessioned2016-08-30T17:34:03Z
dc.date.available2016-08-30T17:34:03Z
dc.date.issued1997
dc.identifier.urihttp://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&res_dat=xri:pqm&rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:9811162
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/130801
dc.description.abstractThis study examines faculty views regarding the adaptability of industrially-based quality management principles to the college classroom. A set of conceptually similar principles of quality management and of classroom teaching and learning were first derived from the literature in both fields. Thirty-two faculty from two institutions and four academic disciplines were asked in semi-structured interviews to discuss the translation and application to teaching and learning of nine principles of quality management. Based on practices and adapted language that they suggested, the tentative list of literature-based principles for teaching and learning was refined. These principles were then integrated into a quality management process model for the college classroom. The set of adapted teaching and learning principles fit into a three-phase quality management process model. The three phases are: organization, planning and communication; teaching methods and learning environments; and process improvement. This three-phase model corresponds to quality improvement processes commonly presented in the quality literature. Course planning, active learning, and classroom research are emphasized in this model. Faculty were able to translate most of the quality management principles to the classroom setting either directly or by suggesting language adaptations. In addition to identifying congruent principles between the two settings, faculty members underscored differences between education and industry, not only in language but in basic assumptions and emphases. Attitudes toward variation and diversity emerged as the most significant issue separating industrial and educational efforts to improve quality. Faculty felt that diversity (variation) was desired in the classroom, not something to be controlled as is emphasized in the quality literature. Views regarding student participation and self-regulated learning varied among faculty in different disciplines. Faculty in the two institutions tended to respond similarly to questions about the applicability to the classroom of quality management principles. This study suggests that quality principles from industry are adaptable and potentially useful for improving teaching and learning as long as these principles are carefully adapted to the college setting. A second and expanded study is necessary to refine the details of the teaching and learning principles found in this study to be conceptually similar to industrial quality management.
dc.format.extent173 p.
dc.languageEnglish
dc.language.isoEN
dc.subjectClassroom
dc.subjectCollege Classrooms
dc.subjectManagement
dc.subjectPostsecondary
dc.subjectQuality
dc.titleQuality management for the postsecondary classroom.
dc.typeThesis
dc.description.thesisdegreenamePhDen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreedisciplineCurriculum development
dc.description.thesisdegreedisciplineEducation
dc.description.thesisdegreedisciplineHigher education
dc.description.thesisdegreegrantorUniversity of Michigan, Horace H. Rackham School of Graduate Studies
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/130801/2/9811162.pdf
dc.owningcollnameDissertations and Theses (Ph.D. and Master's)


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.