Show simple item record

Lean manufacturing practices: Do they work in American companies?

dc.contributor.authorRasch, Steven Frederic
dc.contributor.advisorLiker, Jeffrey K.
dc.date.accessioned2016-08-30T17:39:28Z
dc.date.available2016-08-30T17:39:28Z
dc.date.issued1998
dc.identifier.urihttp://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&res_dat=xri:pqm&rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:9825328
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/131079
dc.description.abstractFrederick Taylor revolutionized the workplace during the early twentieth century with his ideas on work organization and task decomposition. Since then, many organizational theorists have redefined management and workforce relations to improve productivity and worker satisfaction. Today, lean manufacturing concepts are widely accepted as the most effective way to manage manufacturing processes and attain a high degree of worker competency and dedication. The best known study designed to evaluate the impact of lean manufacturing was the International Motor Vehicle Program (IMVP). While comprehensive, critics maintain that the IMVP study did not directly assess causal relationships between lean production practices and related manufacturing and design performance measures. This dissertation is an empirical study of the theories and concepts of lean manufacturing grounded in an open systems theoretical framework. It assesses causal relationships between lean manufacturing and design practices and company performance. Five subsystem models are accessed: Human Organization, Production Technology and Methods, Quality System, Supplier System and Design System. Twenty-five manufacturing practices and six design practices are examined. The significance of lean manufacturing and design practices is determined by testing seventy-three hypotheses using seven performance measures: Shop-Floor Efficiency, Product Quality, Employee Grievances, Unscheduled Downtime, Supplier Performance, Initial Design Time and Significant Design Changes. The interaction between production worker influence and production strategies is assessed. Six hypotheses are tested using five manufacturing practices: Production Worker Involvement and Suggestions, Production Worker Authority, Just-In-Time Inventory Methods, Business System Automation and Preventative Maintenance. Empirical data used to test all seventy-nine hypotheses were collected through a comprehensive survey conducted in 1992 by the Midwest Manufacturing Technology Center at the Industrial Technology Institute. Two hundred forty-nine small manufacturing companies from four industries participated in the study. Thirty-seven causal relationships were supported using multiple regression techniques. In summary, shop-floor efficiency and product quality were increased by self-directed work teams, production worker involvement and just-in-time inventory methods. Supplier performance was increased by the use of sole source suppliers and long term contracts. Design performance was increased by the use of concurrent engineering teams and training. Finally, the interaction between production worker influence and production strategies proved to be significant.
dc.format.extent184 p.
dc.languageEnglish
dc.language.isoEN
dc.subjectAmerican
dc.subjectCompanies
dc.subjectJob Satisfaction
dc.subjectLean
dc.subjectManufacturing
dc.subjectPractices
dc.subjectProductivity
dc.subjectThey
dc.subjectWork
dc.titleLean manufacturing practices: Do they work in American companies?
dc.typeThesis
dc.description.thesisdegreenamePhDen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreedisciplineApplied Sciences
dc.description.thesisdegreedisciplineIndustrial engineering
dc.description.thesisdegreedisciplineLabor relations
dc.description.thesisdegreedisciplineOccupational psychology
dc.description.thesisdegreedisciplinePsychology
dc.description.thesisdegreedisciplineSocial Sciences
dc.description.thesisdegreegrantorUniversity of Michigan, Horace H. Rackham School of Graduate Studies
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/131079/2/9825328.pdf
dc.owningcollnameDissertations and Theses (Ph.D. and Master's)


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.