Show simple item record

Occupational health and safety management system conformity assessment: Development and evaluation of a universal assessment instrument.

dc.contributor.authorRedinger, Charles Francis
dc.contributor.advisorLevine, Steven P.
dc.contributor.advisorDrewnowski, Adam
dc.date.accessioned2016-08-30T17:39:30Z
dc.date.available2016-08-30T17:39:30Z
dc.date.issued1998
dc.identifier.urihttp://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&res_dat=xri:pqm&rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:9825330
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/131081
dc.description.abstractThe monetary cost and human suffering associated with occupational injuries, illnesses, and fatalities continue to be serious concerns. Methods to augment traditional command-and-control regulatory approaches are being explored with the goal of reducing occupational health and safety (OHS) incidence rates. One such approach is the introduction of systems theory to create occupational health and safety management systems (OHSMS), the increased use of which requires strategies for measuring their effectiveness. The objectives of this research project were to develop and evaluate an OHSMS assessment instrument with universal application, whereby determinations of OHSMS effectiveness can be made, and to propose an OHS conformity-assessment framework within which such an instrument may be used and third-party certification/registration performed. Four publicly-available OHSMS models were used to develop the instrument: (1) the Occupational Safety and Health Administration's Voluntary Protection Program (VPP); (2) the British Standards Institute's BS 8800; (3) the American Industrial Hygiene Association's (AIHA) OHSMS; and, (4) the International Organization for Standardization's (ISO) 14001. Four sets of decision rules were developed and followed to guide the input model partitioning and initial instrument development. Review of the instrument by a panel of OHS experts was performed using Delphi procedures. The instrument contains five organizing categories, 27 sections, 118 OHSMS principles, and 486 measurement criteria. Variables/operational definitions, in the form of questions, were developed for 10 percent of the measurement criteria. Pilot tests of the instrument were performed at three large organizations which had implemented an OHSMS. The pilot tests revealed that 88, 76, and 64 percent, respectively, of the principles, measurement criteria, and variables/operational definitions were relevant to the test sites. The results of these pilot tests and what was learned from administering them confirm that there is a need for a comprehensive OHSMS assessment instrument and that such an instrument is needed for the development of a rational system for third-party certification/registration and accreditation. The instrument developed in this research project meets these needs. Comparative evaluations of OHSMS models with a standard assessment instrument creates the potential for continual reductions in incidents of occupational injury, illness, and fatality.
dc.format.extent287 p.
dc.languageEnglish
dc.language.isoEN
dc.subjectAssessment
dc.subjectConformity
dc.subjectDevelopment
dc.subjectEvaluation
dc.subjectHealth
dc.subjectInstrument
dc.subjectManagement
dc.subjectOccupational
dc.subjectSafety
dc.subjectSystem
dc.subjectUniversal
dc.titleOccupational health and safety management system conformity assessment: Development and evaluation of a universal assessment instrument.
dc.typeThesis
dc.description.thesisdegreenamePhDen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreedisciplineEnvironmental science
dc.description.thesisdegreedisciplineHealth and Environmental Sciences
dc.description.thesisdegreedisciplineOccupational safety
dc.description.thesisdegreedisciplinePublic health
dc.description.thesisdegreegrantorUniversity of Michigan, Horace H. Rackham School of Graduate Studies
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/131081/2/9825330.pdf
dc.owningcollnameDissertations and Theses (Ph.D. and Master's)


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.