Show simple item record

Female social preferences and mating behavior in captive group-living baboons (Papio cynocephalus anubis): An experimental study.

dc.contributor.authorSchneider, Rebecca Dowhan
dc.contributor.advisorSmuts, Barbara
dc.contributor.advisorMitani, John
dc.date.accessioned2016-08-30T17:43:58Z
dc.date.available2016-08-30T17:43:58Z
dc.date.issued1998
dc.identifier.urihttp://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&res_dat=xri:pqm&rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:9840644
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/131323
dc.description.abstractIn recent years an increasing amount of research has been devoted to examining the importance of female mate choice among nonhuman primates. However, our understanding of this topic is limited due to the observational nature of most studies, which cannot clearly distinguish between females preferences and female choice. In particular, observational studies alone cannot tease apart the effects of female mating preferences from the effects of male behavioral influences upon females (e.g. male-male competition and male sexual coercion). In response to the lack of information on female preferences in primate species, I conducted an experimental study on captive savanna baboons (Papio cynocephalus anubis), that allowed females to express their preferences in the absence of male opportunities to exclude rival males or coerce females. This was accomplished by removing a female and three males, including the female's current consort partner, from a naturalistic group setting and placing them in a free-choice situation in which females were given complete control over their interactions with males. Comparisons were made between female preferences in the experimental condition and female behavior in the group setting to (a) determine the extent to which females form consortships with preferred males, and (b) assess whether female affiliative behavior in the group setting predicts female preferences in the experimental setting. Analysis of experimental trials indicated that most females showed distinct preferences for one male when given the opportunity to choose from among three males. In addition, most females showed a preference for their most frequent consort partner. Finally, a strong association was found between female grooming of males in the corral, consort formation, and trial preferences. These results suggest that female preference for consort males is based on their affiliative preferences for those males in the outdoor corral. This study also reveals striking individual variation in which males female preferred. These results suggest that, in contrast to other species, including birds, fish, and rodents, in which females often base their preferences on singular male morphological traits, among baboons, female preferences are based, at least in part, on relationship-specific benefits provided by males.
dc.format.extent217 p.
dc.languageEnglish
dc.language.isoEN
dc.subjectAnubis
dc.subjectBaboons
dc.subjectCaptive
dc.subjectExperimental
dc.subjectFemale Social Preferences
dc.subjectGroup
dc.subjectLiving
dc.subjectMating Behavior
dc.subjectPapio Cynocephalus
dc.subjectPreference
dc.subjectStudy
dc.titleFemale social preferences and mating behavior in captive group-living baboons (Papio cynocephalus anubis): An experimental study.
dc.typeThesis
dc.description.thesisdegreenamePhDen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreedisciplineBiological Sciences
dc.description.thesisdegreedisciplineEcology
dc.description.thesisdegreedisciplinePsychobiology
dc.description.thesisdegreedisciplinePsychology
dc.description.thesisdegreedisciplineSocial psychology
dc.description.thesisdegreegrantorUniversity of Michigan, Horace H. Rackham School of Graduate Studies
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/131323/2/9840644.pdf
dc.owningcollnameDissertations and Theses (Ph.D. and Master's)


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.