Show simple item record

Business regime loyalties in the Arab world: Jordan and Morocco in comparative perspective.

dc.contributor.authorGreenwood, Scott
dc.contributor.advisorPahre, Robert
dc.date.accessioned2016-08-30T17:45:58Z
dc.date.available2016-08-30T17:45:58Z
dc.date.issued1998
dc.identifier.urihttp://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&res_dat=xri:pqm&rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:9909894
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/131430
dc.description.abstractThe thesis examines why business people from various economic sectors in the Middle East and North Africa have continued to support authoritarian regimes in spite of the fact that these regimes failed to satisfy several of business' fundamental interests. Studies of business regime loyalties in Latin America argue that ineffective management of the economy by authoritarian rulers, exclusion of business people from policy making, and a significant decline in the legitimacy of authoritarian rule generally encourage business people to withdraw their support for an authoritarian regime and call for its replacement with a democratic one more likely to satisfy business' fundamental interests. However when these three conditions existed in several Arab states during the 1980s, their business communities continued to support authoritarianism. In order to explain the behavior of Arab business communities the thesis emphasizes several points. First, as long as diverse elements within the private sector can profit from economic policies, business people are unlikely to mobilize against a regime even if this regime excludes business from policy-making and pursues statist economic policies. Second, in countries where the political regime proves incapable of managing the economy, the consistent inflow of rentier income (i.e., economic aid, tourism receipts, and workers' remittances) can help protect business from the negative effects of economic mismanagement. If rentier income largely counteracts the negative effects of poor economic management on business, then the private sector is less likely to mobilize against the political regime. Third, the perceptions that business people hold toward the political alternatives to authoritarian rule have a significant effect on business loyalty to authoritarian regimes. If entrepreneurs in various sectors do not see a viable alternative to authoritarian rule, then they will continue to support it as the most likely regime to ensure stability and continuity. Finally, the views that democratic opposition groups and the general populace hold towards market-based reforms significantly affect business loyalty to authoritarian regimes. If these groups strongly oppose such reforms entrepreneurs are more likely to support an authoritarian regime even if this regime faces strong challenges from the political opposition.
dc.format.extent314 p.
dc.languageEnglish
dc.language.isoEN
dc.subjectArab
dc.subjectBusiness
dc.subjectComparative
dc.subjectJordan
dc.subjectLoyalties
dc.subjectMorocco
dc.subjectPerspective
dc.subjectRegime
dc.subjectWorld
dc.titleBusiness regime loyalties in the Arab world: Jordan and Morocco in comparative perspective.
dc.typeThesis
dc.description.thesisdegreenamePhDen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreedisciplinePolitical science
dc.description.thesisdegreedisciplineSocial Sciences
dc.description.thesisdegreegrantorUniversity of Michigan, Horace H. Rackham School of Graduate Studies
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/131430/2/9909894.pdf
dc.owningcollnameDissertations and Theses (Ph.D. and Master's)


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.