Show simple item record

In sight of America: Photography and United States immigration policy, 1880--1930.

dc.contributor.authorGordon, Anna Pegler
dc.contributor.advisorSanchez, George J.
dc.contributor.advisorSmith, Richard Candida
dc.date.accessioned2016-08-30T17:55:07Z
dc.date.available2016-08-30T17:55:07Z
dc.date.issued2002
dc.identifier.urihttp://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&res_dat=xri:pqm&rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3057954
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/131921
dc.description.abstractSince its beginnings, the history of federal immigration law has been the history of making immigrants visible. As new laws limiting U.S. immigration were introduced in the late-nineteenth and early-twentieth centuries, they commonly involved new requirements for observing, documenting and photographing immigrants. This study explores three connected moments in the development of visual immigration policy: the photographic documentation of the Chinese in America starting with Chinese exclusion in the 1880s; the establishment of Ellis Island as a site for observing European immigrants in the 1890s; and the implementation of photographic identity cards on the Mexican-U.S. border in the 1910s and 1920s. These histories show how the emergent visual regimes of criminal, medical and ethnographic photography played a significant role in the development of federal immigration policy and the introduction of racial immigration restrictions. Between 1882 and 1928, the United States introduced and expanded a racialized system of immigration restriction through Chinese exclusion, Mexican-U.S. border regulation, and quotas based on national origins. As each new restriction was introduced, it was underpinned by a racialized system of visual and photographic regulation. Chinese, European and Mexican migrants were subject to different policies and practices of photographic representation, which reflected and reinforced the Immigration Bureau's understanding of their racial identities. However, they resisted these policies in varied ways from controlling their own representations in photographs to manipulating photographic identity documentation. In the process, they not only shaped the implementation of immigration policy but also challenged the evidentiary authority of photography. Positioned at the intersection of immigration history and visual culture, this dissertation links original archival research on federal immigration policy with detailed readings of photographic collections, photographers and individual images. Drawing on numerous immigrant case files, this study presents a new perspective on U.S. immigration policy that recognizes the central role of visuality within history.
dc.format.extent388 p.
dc.languageEnglish
dc.language.isoEN
dc.subjectAmerica
dc.subjectChinese-american
dc.subjectIdentity Documentation
dc.subjectImmigration Policy
dc.subjectLatino
dc.subjectNdash
dc.subjectPhotography
dc.subjectSight
dc.subjectStates
dc.subjectUnited
dc.titleIn sight of America: Photography and United States immigration policy, 1880--1930.
dc.typeThesis
dc.description.thesisdegreenamePhDen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreedisciplineAmerican history
dc.description.thesisdegreedisciplineAmerican studies
dc.description.thesisdegreedisciplineArt history
dc.description.thesisdegreedisciplineCommunication and the Arts
dc.description.thesisdegreedisciplineSocial Sciences
dc.description.thesisdegreegrantorUniversity of Michigan, Horace H. Rackham School of Graduate Studies
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/131921/2/3057954.pdf
dc.owningcollnameDissertations and Theses (Ph.D. and Master's)


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.