Show simple item record

Electron beam ablation of materials.

dc.contributor.authorKovaleski, Scott Douglas
dc.contributor.advisorGilgenbach, Ronald M.
dc.date.accessioned2016-08-30T17:55:09Z
dc.date.available2016-08-30T17:55:09Z
dc.date.issued1999
dc.identifier.urihttp://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&res_dat=xri:pqm&rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:9938466
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/131923
dc.description.abstractA low accelerating voltage, high current electron beam accelerator, called the channelspark, has been used for ablation of materials applied to thin film deposition. The channelspark is a pseudospark-like device with the multi-gap arrangement of pseudosparks replaced by a continuous dielectric tube. The channelspark operates at accelerating voltages of 15 to 20 kV with &sim;1500 A beam currents. The electron beam ionizes a low pressure gas fill (10 to 20 mTorr Ar or N<sub>2</sub>) to compensate its own space charge, allowing for such large currents. Ablation of Fe, Ti, TiN, Si, and fused silica have been studied through plasma diagnostics including optical emission spectroscopy, dye laser resonance absorption photography (DLRAP), non-resonant interferometry and resonant ultra-violet interferometry (RUVI). In addition, thin films Of SiO<sub>2</sub> have been deposited. The morphology and stoichiometry of these films has been studied via scanning electron microscropy (SEM) and x-ray energy dispersive spectroscopy (XEDS) respectively. Strong optical emission from ionized species, persisting for several microseconds, was observed in the electron beam ablated plumes. Free electron temperatures were inferred from relative emission intensities to be between 1.1 and 1.2 eV. DLRAP showed plume expansion velocities from 0.38 to 1.4 cm/mus for several pressures of Ar or N<sub>2</sub> background gas. A complex, multilobed plume structure was also observed. Nonresonant interferometry yielded electron densities of about 2.5 x 10<super>17</super> cm<super>-3</super> near the target surface. RUVI performed on Si neutral atoms generated in the ablation plumes of fused silica measured line integrated densities of up to 16 x 10<sub>15</sub> cm<super>-2</super>, with the total number of ablated silicon neutrals, calculated to be in the range 20 x 10<super> 14</super> to 0.5 x 10<super>14</super>. Electron beam deposited films of fused silica were microscopically rough, with a thickness variability of 7%. The average deposition rate was found to be about 0.66 shot The electron beam deposited fused silica films had accurately maintained stoichiometry. Ablated particulate had an average diameter near 60 nm, with a most probable diameter between 40 and 60 nm. The mass of material ablated in the form of particulate made up only a few percent of the deposited film mass, the remainder being composed of atomized material.
dc.format.extent155 p.
dc.languageEnglish
dc.language.isoEN
dc.subjectAblation
dc.subjectElectron Beam Accelerators
dc.subjectMaterials
dc.subjectPulsed Electron Beam Deposition
dc.titleElectron beam ablation of materials.
dc.typeThesis
dc.description.thesisdegreenamePhDen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreedisciplineApplied Sciences
dc.description.thesisdegreedisciplineChemical engineering
dc.description.thesisdegreedisciplineMaterials science
dc.description.thesisdegreedisciplinePlasma physics
dc.description.thesisdegreedisciplinePure Sciences
dc.description.thesisdegreegrantorUniversity of Michigan, Horace H. Rackham School of Graduate Studies
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/131923/2/9938466.pdf
dc.owningcollnameDissertations and Theses (Ph.D. and Master's)


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.