Show simple item record

Incorporation of uncertainties from setup errors and organ motion in 3-D dose calculations.

dc.contributor.authorLujan, Anthony Eloy
dc.contributor.advisorLarsen, Edward W.
dc.contributor.advisorHaken, Randall K. Ten
dc.date.accessioned2016-08-30T17:55:27Z
dc.date.available2016-08-30T17:55:27Z
dc.date.issued1999
dc.identifier.urihttp://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&res_dat=xri:pqm&rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:9938480
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/131938
dc.description.abstractExternal beam radiotherapy is one of several methods used in the treatment of intraheptatic cancer. Treatment plans are generated based on a static CT Scan of a patient, and treatment is delivered in multiple fractions. The dose distribution calculated using a single CT study does not include uncertainties from daily setup or organ motion. Monte Carlo-based methods have been proposed to address this concern, but these methods are cumbersome and inefficient. Methods based on a convolution of the static dose distribution with functions representing the setup uncertainties in three dimensions (for incorporating setup uncertainties) have been reported for prostate and nasopharynx treatments. In this thesis, we apply similar convolution methods to incorporate setup uncertainties and organ motion due to breathing for treatment of the liver. We develop a model that describes the motion of the liver due to breathing and we show that convolution-based techniques are sufficient to predict the dose distribution the patient receives for any number of fractions. For setup uncertainties, we show that convolution-based methods calculate the distribution of average dose values given an infinite number of fractions. However, because the patient receives a finite (not infinite) number of fractions, the actual dose distribution realized by the patient may differ from the distribution of average dose values. We extend the original model and derive an approach to calculate the distribution of standard deviation values at any point in the patient. The differences between a finite-fractioned treatment and the results of convolution-based calculations are characterized by the standard deviation at each point using the Central Limit Theorem. Further, we apply our convolution-based techniques to incorporate the effects of both setup uncertainties and organ motion due to breathing in a single distribution of dose values. Our results are confirmed via comparison to Monte-Carlo-based direct simulations of patient treatment and are generated on a time scale suitable for clinical applications. Finally, we address potential applications and future research associated with this thesis.
dc.format.extent209 p.
dc.languageEnglish
dc.language.isoEN
dc.subjectDose Calculations
dc.subjectIncorporation
dc.subjectOrgan Motion
dc.subjectRadiation Therapy
dc.subjectSetup Errors
dc.subjectUncertainties
dc.titleIncorporation of uncertainties from setup errors and organ motion in 3-D dose calculations.
dc.typeThesis
dc.description.thesisdegreenamePhDen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreedisciplineApplied Sciences
dc.description.thesisdegreedisciplineHealth and Environmental Sciences
dc.description.thesisdegreedisciplineNuclear engineering
dc.description.thesisdegreedisciplineNuclear physics and radiation
dc.description.thesisdegreedisciplineOncology
dc.description.thesisdegreedisciplinePure Sciences
dc.description.thesisdegreegrantorUniversity of Michigan, Horace H. Rackham School of Graduate Studies
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/131938/2/9938480.pdf
dc.owningcollnameDissertations and Theses (Ph.D. and Master's)


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.