The effects of pollination and resources on the reproduction and establishment of Lespedeza virginica (Fabaceae).
Simpson, Rachel Ann
1999
Abstract
Many flowering plants require animal pollinators for reproduction, and plants may compete for shared pollinators. Introduced plants may be new competitors which reduce the pollination and fruit set of native species. Few studies have examined pollination competition, used field-wide competitor removals, or examined the potential effects of introduced plants on pollination of natives. I investigated pollination competition between the native <italic>Lespedeza virginica</italic> (Fabaceae) and an introduced plant, <italic>Centaurea maculosa </italic> (Asteraceae), in old-fields of the Edwin S. George Reserve, Livingston County, Michigan, USA. I did field-wide removals of <italic>C. maculosa</italic> and determined if fruit set of <italic>Lespedeza</italic> was pollen-limited. <italic> Lespedeza</italic> is self-compatible, but it can not auto-pollinate and can be pollen-limited. I also added seeds to determine if populations were seed-limited. In addition, I experimentally manipulated resource availability to determine if <italic>Lespedeza</italic>'s production of cleistogamous and chasmogamous fruits was resource-limited. Finally, I review experimental tests of competition for pollination and propose a model based on indirect interactions. In 1995 when I reduced <italic>Centaurea</italic> flower densities, visits per flower to <italic>Lespedeza</italic> significantly increased. However, fruit set of <italic>Lespedeza</italic> was not affected, suggesting that visitation in the presence of <italic>Centaurea</italic> was above a threshold required for fruit set. In 1996 neither visitation nor fruit set were affected by <italic>Centaurea</italic> removal. Pollinator visitation was lower in 1996, and there was a stronger correlation between visitation and fruit set, suggesting that visitation was below the threshold required for maximum fruit set. Therefore, in one of only a few studies of effects of introduced plants on natives as a result of pollinator-sharing, my results indicate no effect on fruit set. When I added seeds, I found a significant increase in seedling number, and subsequent survivorship data indicate that pollen limitation of seed set could affect subsequent populations. When I increased resource availability, the number of both cleistogamous and chasmogamous fruits increased, but chasmogamous fruits increased proportionately more. I propose a new evolutionary explanation for this pattern, based on how the cost:benefit ratio of chasmogamous flowers may change as flower number increases, due to increasing geitonogamy and decreasing pollen donation.Subjects
Centaurea Maculosa Effects Establishment Fabaceae Lespedeza Virginica Pollination Reproduction Resources
Types
Thesis
Metadata
Show full item recordCollections
Remediation of Harmful Language
The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.
Accessibility
If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.