Show simple item record

The run to Division I: Intercollegiate athletics and the broader interests of colleges and universities.

dc.contributor.authorCross, Michael Edward
dc.contributor.advisorPeterson, Marvin W.
dc.date.accessioned2016-08-30T17:58:40Z
dc.date.available2016-08-30T17:58:40Z
dc.date.issued1999
dc.identifier.urihttp://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&res_dat=xri:pqm&rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:9959735
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/132108
dc.description.abstractAn intercollegiate athletics program has the ability to provide unique insight into the college or university that sponsors it. The presence or absence of a program and its level of competition can provide a proxy for understanding a university's broader interests. A comparative case study of four universities examined the rationale for changing athletic classification and the realization of anticipated effects for each school. A conceptual framework derived from institutional theory guided the research. The rationale for changing intercollegiate athletic classification was based on expected benefits for undergraduate admissions, alumni support and development, community relationships, campus life, university visibility, and university association. The quality and quantity of undergraduate applicants improved at universities with regional recruiting areas and when the men's basketball team received a bid to the NCAA tournament. Alumni donations and support were directed towards athletics with no observed effect for general university fund-raising. Community relationships and campus life showed improvement at universities that hosted international or national athletic competitions or built new facilities in conjunction with Division I membership. Visibility was enhanced in all cases through exposure on CNN or ESPN and through positive local media portrayal. Benefits of association with peer schools were observed in each case and generally related to conference affiliation. In each case, intercollegiate athletics was part of an institutionalized environment. The athletic program conformed to rationalized institutional myths about appropriate university form and provided legitimacy and resources for the sponsoring university. Each university used athletics to engage in mimetic isomorphism and respond to organizational uncertainty in a conscious attempt to imitate peer universities and conform with expected social norms.
dc.format.extent261 p.
dc.languageEnglish
dc.language.isoEN
dc.subjectAthletics
dc.subjectBroader
dc.subjectColleges
dc.subjectDivision I
dc.subjectIntercollegiate
dc.subjectInterests
dc.subjectRun
dc.subjectUniversities
dc.titleThe run to Division I: Intercollegiate athletics and the broader interests of colleges and universities.
dc.typeThesis
dc.description.thesisdegreenamePhDen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreedisciplineEducation
dc.description.thesisdegreedisciplineHigher education
dc.description.thesisdegreedisciplineRecreation
dc.description.thesisdegreedisciplineSocial Sciences
dc.description.thesisdegreegrantorUniversity of Michigan, Horace H. Rackham School of Graduate Studies
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/132108/2/9959735.pdf
dc.owningcollnameDissertations and Theses (Ph.D. and Master's)


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.