Show simple item record

An application of the Lotka -Volterra model to competition between two lotic grazers.

dc.contributor.authorElzinga, Charles H.
dc.contributor.advisorWiley, Michael J.
dc.date.accessioned2016-08-30T18:03:04Z
dc.date.available2016-08-30T18:03:04Z
dc.date.issued2000
dc.identifier.urihttp://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&res_dat=xri:pqm&rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:9963776
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/132342
dc.description.abstractTo date the importance of competition in structuring stream communities is unclear. Compelling evidence that competition might affect benthic communities in several Michigan trout streams comes from recent studies that monitored population shifts in periphyton-grazing taxa, in response to a microsporidian infection of the caddisfly <italic>Glossosoma nigrior</italic>, a dominant grazer in many cold-water streams. The most dramatic response to the parasitic-induced collapse of <italic>Glossosoma</italic> was that of <italic>Goera stylata </italic>, a caddisfly previously unreported from these streams. I conducted series of laboratory experiments to (1) measure changes in competition between these taxa during their larval development and (2) parameterize the Lotka-Volterra model and to use it to understand the mechanism at work. Experiments used a target-competitor design to measure the relative effect of competition on the foraging time of <italic>Glossosoma</italic> and <italic> Goera</italic> larvae, as measured from time-lapse video recordings. For each of three instar pairings examined (4<super>th</super>- and two 5<super>th </super>-instar <italic>Glossosoma</italic> vs. 3<super>rd</super>-, 2<super> nd</super>-, and 5<super>th</super>-instar Goera, respectively) competitive equivalence (alpha) was estimated from the rate at which per capita foraging time diminished with increased treatment densities of conspecifics and competitors. On a per capita basis, competition was symmetric only between 5<super>th</super>-instar <italic>Glossosoma</italic> and 2<super>nd</super>-instar <italic> Goera</italic>, whereas it strongly favored <italic>Goera</italic> in the other two pairings. The explanation for <italic>Glossosoma</italic>'s competitive dominance was understood only after applying the Lotka-Volterra model and considering the importance of each species' relative carrying capacity (K). <italic> Glossosoma</italic>'s mean maximum abundance was &ge;11x that of <italic> Goera</italic>'s in three Michigan streams. <italic>Glossosoma</italic>'s finer mouthpart structure might allow it to crop periphyton below what is available to <italic>Goera</italic> and thereby contribute to <italic>Glossosoma </italic>'s larger K. The strong relationship between instar-specific alpha and instar biomass ratios allowed me to predict alphas for all possible instar pairings and then to consider how developmental phenology and life history strategies of these taxa might influence their competitive outcome. This application of the Lotka-Volterra model identified competitive bottlenecks for <italic>Goera </italic>, both when <italic>Glossosoma</italic> exhibits distinct cohorts and when there is broad overlap in its cohort structure, and it provided a framework for considering how <italic>Glossosoma</italic> maintains its competitive dominance over other grazer taxa.
dc.format.extent99 p.
dc.languageEnglish
dc.language.isoEN
dc.subjectApplication
dc.subjectCompetition
dc.subjectGlossosoma Nigrior
dc.subjectGoera Stylata
dc.subjectLotic Grazers
dc.subjectLotka-volterra Model
dc.subjectTwo
dc.titleAn application of the Lotka -Volterra model to competition between two lotic grazers.
dc.typeThesis
dc.description.thesisdegreenamePhDen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreedisciplineBiological Sciences
dc.description.thesisdegreedisciplineEcology
dc.description.thesisdegreedisciplineLimnology
dc.description.thesisdegreegrantorUniversity of Michigan, Horace H. Rackham School of Graduate Studies
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/132342/2/9963776.pdf
dc.owningcollnameDissertations and Theses (Ph.D. and Master's)


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.