Establishing Data Collection Procedures Equivalence
dc.contributor.author | Chidlow, Agnieszka | |
dc.contributor.author | Ghauri, Pervez N. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2016-08-30T19:49:42Z | |
dc.date.available | 2016-08-30T19:49:42Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2011-03-01 | |
dc.identifier.other | RePEc:wdi:papers:2011-1013 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/133028 | |
dc.description.abstract | Following a number of earlier studies on data equivalence in cross-cultural international business research, this article uses a content analysis of articles published in four leading international business journals from 2000 to 2009, to uncover the equivalence in current state of data collection procedures used by researchers in mail surveys. The results show that, despite repeated calls and the existence of a well established theoretical framework for mail survey data collection by Don Dillman (1978, 1999), international business scholars have not been inspired to adopt and report the data collection procedures adequately in their work. We hope this work will draw due attention to the aspect in international business research. | |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | wp1013 | |
dc.subject | International business research | |
dc.subject | Mail survey | |
dc.subject | Data collection procedure | |
dc.subject | Equivalence and Content analysis | |
dc.subject.other | A30 | |
dc.subject.other | B41 | |
dc.subject.other | M16 | |
dc.title | Establishing Data Collection Procedures Equivalence | |
dc.type | Working Paper | |
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevel | Economics | |
dc.subject.hlbtoplevel | Business | |
dc.contributor.affiliationum | William Davidson Institute | |
dc.description.bitstreamurl | http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/133028/1/wp1013.pdf | |
dc.contributor.authoremail | a.chidlow@mmu.ac.uk | |
dc.owningcollname | William Davidson Institute (WDI) - Working Papers |
Files in this item
Remediation of Harmful Language
The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.
Accessibility
If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.