Economic (In)Security and Gender Differences in Trade Policy Attitudes
dc.contributor.author | Drope, Jeffrey | |
dc.contributor.author | Chowdhury, Abdur | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2016-08-30T19:50:41Z | |
dc.date.available | 2016-08-30T19:50:41Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2014-01-01 | |
dc.identifier.other | RePEc:wdi:papers:2014-1067 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/133087 | |
dc.description.abstract | Over time and across countries, researchers have noted frequent and mostly unexplained gender differences in the levels of support for policies of free or freer trade: women tend to be less favorable toward policies of liberalizing trade than men. Using an economic security explanation based principally on a mobile factors approach, we find that it is not women generally who are more negative toward trade but particularly economically vulnerable women – i.e. women from the scarce labor factor. We utilize recent survey data on individuals’ attitudes toward different facets of trade and its effects across three disparate regions to examine this phenomenon empirically. An economic security approach helps to explain the marked differences in attitudes toward trade among lower- and higher-skilled females in developing and developed countries. | |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | wp1067 | |
dc.subject | trade policy | |
dc.subject | gender difference | |
dc.subject | labor mobility | |
dc.subject | Latin America | |
dc.subject | Muslim countries | |
dc.subject.other | F14 | |
dc.subject.other | F20 | |
dc.subject.other | O57 | |
dc.title | Economic (In)Security and Gender Differences in Trade Policy Attitudes | |
dc.type | Working Paper | |
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevel | Economics | |
dc.subject.hlbtoplevel | Business | |
dc.contributor.affiliationum | William Davidson Institute | |
dc.description.bitstreamurl | http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/133087/1/wp1067.pdf | |
dc.contributor.authoremail | [email protected] | |
dc.owningcollname | William Davidson Institute (WDI) - Working Papers |
Files in this item
Remediation of Harmful Language
The University of Michigan Library aims to describe its collections in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in them. We encourage you to Contact Us anonymously if you encounter harmful or problematic language in catalog records or finding aids. More information about our policies and practices is available at Remediation of Harmful Language.
Accessibility
If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.