Show simple item record

Economic (In)Security and Gender Differences in Trade Policy Attitudes

dc.contributor.authorDrope, Jeffrey
dc.contributor.authorChowdhury, Abdur
dc.date.accessioned2016-08-30T19:50:41Z
dc.date.available2016-08-30T19:50:41Z
dc.date.issued2014-01-01
dc.identifier.otherRePEc:wdi:papers:2014-1067
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/133087
dc.description.abstractOver time and across countries, researchers have noted frequent and mostly unexplained gender differences in the levels of support for policies of free or freer trade: women tend to be less favorable toward policies of liberalizing trade than men. Using an economic security explanation based principally on a mobile factors approach, we find that it is not women generally who are more negative toward trade but particularly economically vulnerable women – i.e. women from the scarce labor factor. We utilize recent survey data on individuals’ attitudes toward different facets of trade and its effects across three disparate regions to examine this phenomenon empirically. An economic security approach helps to explain the marked differences in attitudes toward trade among lower- and higher-skilled females in developing and developed countries.
dc.relation.ispartofserieswp1067
dc.subjecttrade policy
dc.subjectgender difference
dc.subjectlabor mobility
dc.subjectLatin America
dc.subjectMuslim countries
dc.subject.otherF14
dc.subject.otherF20
dc.subject.otherO57
dc.titleEconomic (In)Security and Gender Differences in Trade Policy Attitudes
dc.typeWorking Paper
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelEconomics
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelBusiness
dc.contributor.affiliationumWilliam Davidson Institute
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/133087/1/wp1067.pdf
dc.contributor.authoremail[email protected]
dc.owningcollnameWilliam Davidson Institute (WDI) - Working Papers


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe its collections in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in them. We encourage you to Contact Us anonymously if you encounter harmful or problematic language in catalog records or finding aids. More information about our policies and practices is available at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.