Show simple item record

Active Listening: The Cultural Politics of Magnetic Recording Technologies in North America, 1945-1993.

dc.contributor.authorMassinon, Pascal
dc.date.accessioned2016-09-13T13:49:57Z
dc.date.availableNO_RESTRICTION
dc.date.available2016-09-13T13:49:57Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.date.submitted2016
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/133192
dc.description.abstractFrom the late 1940s to the mid 1990s, the use of magnetic tape recorders provoked aesthetic, social, and political debates about the decentralization of sonic production. At the very moment that postwar mass culture seemed most ascendant and critics began to identify it as a coherent object of study and scorn, reel-to-reel tape recorders allowed users to reproduce and manipulate mass-produced sounds emanating from radio and recording studios, as well as the sounds of their households, their communities, and the larger world outside their homes. Many non-professional tape users, non-commercial sonic researchers, and hobbyist audio networkers would come to believe that they could be more than passive recipients of culture industry products and the dominant ideologies that they transmitted; through an active engagement with tape, they hoped to teach listeners to become producers themselves. Listening to their works produced via tape, reading their voluminous writings, and combing their archival collections for evidence of wider connections to their practices, I argue that such tape enthusiasts developed a set of media theories through a self-reflexive recording practice I call active listening. This dissertation follows hobbyists and professional recordists ranging from New York City folklorist and advertiser Tony Schwartz, composer and educator R. Murray Schafer and his World Soundscape Project in Vancouver, British Columbia, and the Iowa City-based audio collective the Tape-beatles, who all proposed multiple forms of engagement with, against, and about mass culture. They made structural critiques of commercial culture industries for separating producers from consumers in the name of profits, perceptual arguments about the capacity for sound to activate new political imaginaries, and aesthetic moves that aimed to reintegrate presumably alienated listening subjects. Not only did the ubiquity of mass culture throughout North America give listeners a shared vocabulary, but the act of appropriating and manipulating sounds on tape fostered a self-consciousness about how mass culture worked and how it might be made to work differently. Such forms of engagement both attempted to eliminate boundaries between the production and consumption of mass culture and bolstered an ideological investment in the idea of mass culture as a passive and alienating force.
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.subjectCultural Politics
dc.subjectMagnetic Recording Technologies
dc.subjectMass Culture
dc.subjectActive Listening
dc.subjectNorth American History
dc.titleActive Listening: The Cultural Politics of Magnetic Recording Technologies in North America, 1945-1993.
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreenamePhDen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreedisciplineHistory
dc.description.thesisdegreegrantorUniversity of Michigan, Horace H. Rackham School of Graduate Studies
dc.contributor.committeememberCook Jr, James W
dc.contributor.committeememberLassiter, Matthew D
dc.contributor.committeememberVaillant, Derek W
dc.contributor.committeememberBrick, Howard
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelHistory (General)
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHumanities
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/133192/1/massinon_1.pdf
dc.owningcollnameDissertations and Theses (Ph.D. and Master's)


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.