Show simple item record

How Mathematical Knowledge for Teaching Intersects with Teaching Practices: The Knowledge and Reasoning Entailed in Selecting Examples and Giving Explanations in Secondary Mathematics.

dc.contributor.authorSnider, Rachel Beth
dc.date.accessioned2016-09-13T13:51:09Z
dc.date.availableNO_RESTRICTION
dc.date.available2016-09-13T13:51:09Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.date.submitted2016
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/133262
dc.description.abstractTeaching requires both knowing and doing. This dissertation helps bridge between research on teacher knowledge and research on teaching practice by conceptualizing the ways in which teachers draw on their knowledge when enacting specific teaching practices. Recent research on mathematical knowledge for teaching has specified different domains of teachers’ knowledge, but has focused less on how teachers use what they know in teaching. Similarly, several teaching practices have been found to matter for student learning, yet researchers have not adequately delved into the knowledge and work entailed in carrying out these practices. To investigate teachers’ knowledge use in practice, this study of eight Algebra II teachers focused on the content of rational expressions and equations and two foundational practices in mathematics teaching, selecting examples and explaining. Data were collected through classroom observations and interviews simulating the two teaching practices. Analyses probed the knowledge used in enacting each practice. One finding of this study is a description of components of the practice of selecting examples and the knowledge teachers draw on in enacting them. For instance, teachers sequence examples and draw on nuanced understandings of differences across a set of mathematical examples. Second, different categories of explanations were seen and teachers’ knowledge use varied by explanation type. Third, across both practices, the knowledge teachers drew on when enacting the practices was associated with differences in how teachers enacted the practice. For example, teachers drew on a broader range of knowledge types when giving mathematical reasoning explanations than when giving procedural explanations. The research also shows the complexity of knowledge use when enacting teaching practices. For example, during a single explanation, one teacher drew on common and specialized content knowledge, knowledge of content and students, and pedagogical knowledge. The findings contribute to theoretical understandings of how teachers use knowledge in teaching by conceptualizing the ways in which teachers draw on their mathematical knowledge for teaching when enacting specific teaching practices. For instance, they better specify types of specialized content knowledge used in practice. This work also has implications for mathematics teacher education and the methods used to study teacher knowledge in practice.
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.subjectMathematical Knowledge for Teaching
dc.subjectTeaching Practices
dc.subjectSecondary Mathematics Teaching
dc.subjectSelecting Examples
dc.subjectGiving Explanations
dc.subjectRational Expressions and Equations
dc.titleHow Mathematical Knowledge for Teaching Intersects with Teaching Practices: The Knowledge and Reasoning Entailed in Selecting Examples and Giving Explanations in Secondary Mathematics.
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreenamePhD
dc.description.thesisdegreedisciplineEducational Studies
dc.description.thesisdegreegrantorUniversity of Michigan, Horace H. Rackham School of Graduate Studies
dc.contributor.committeememberBall, Deborah Loewenberg
dc.contributor.committeememberBass, Hyman
dc.contributor.committeememberMiller, Kevin F
dc.contributor.committeememberHoover, Mark
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelEducation
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelSocial Sciences
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/133262/1/rsnider_1.pdf
dc.owningcollnameDissertations and Theses (Ph.D. and Master's)


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.