Show simple item record

Performance of the Pediatric Glasgow Coma Scale Score in the Evaluation of Children With Blunt Head Trauma

dc.contributor.authorBorgialli, Dominic A.
dc.contributor.authorMahajan, Prashant
dc.contributor.authorHoyle, John D.
dc.contributor.authorPowell, Elizabeth C.
dc.contributor.authorNadel, Frances M.
dc.contributor.authorTunik, Michael G.
dc.contributor.authorFoerster, Adele
dc.contributor.authorDong, Lydia
dc.contributor.authorMiskin, Michelle
dc.contributor.authorDayan, Peter S.
dc.contributor.authorHolmes, James F.
dc.contributor.authorKuppermann, Nathan
dc.contributor.authorWalthall, Jennifer
dc.date.accessioned2016-09-17T23:53:33Z
dc.date.available2017-11-01T15:31:29Zen
dc.date.issued2016-08
dc.identifier.citationBorgialli, Dominic A.; Mahajan, Prashant; Hoyle, John D.; Powell, Elizabeth C.; Nadel, Frances M.; Tunik, Michael G.; Foerster, Adele; Dong, Lydia; Miskin, Michelle; Dayan, Peter S.; Holmes, James F.; Kuppermann, Nathan; Walthall, Jennifer (2016). "Performance of the Pediatric Glasgow Coma Scale Score in the Evaluation of Children With Blunt Head Trauma." Academic Emergency Medicine (8): 878-884.
dc.identifier.issn1069-6563
dc.identifier.issn1553-2712
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/133544
dc.description.abstractObjectiveThe objective was to compare the accuracy of the pediatric Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score in preverbal children to the standard GCS score in older children for identifying those with traumatic brain injuries (TBIs) after blunt head trauma.MethodsThis was a planned secondary analysis of a large prospective observational multicenter cohort study of children with blunt head trauma. Clinical data were recorded onto case report forms before computed tomography (CT) results or clinical outcomes were known. The total and component GCS scores were assigned by the physician at initial emergency department evaluation. The pediatric GCS was used for children <2 years old and the standard GCS for those ≥2 years old. Outcomes were TBI visible on CT and clinically important TBI (ciTBI), defined as death from TBI, neurosurgery, intubation for more than 24 hours for the head injury, or hospitalization for 2 or more nights for the head injury in association with TBI on CT. We compared the areas under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves between age cohorts for the association of GCS and the TBI outcomes.ResultsWe enrolled 42,041 patients, of whom 10,499 (25.0%) were <2 years old. Among patients <2 years, 313/3,329 (9.4%, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 8.4% to 10.4%) of those imaged had TBIs on CT and 146/10,499 (1.4%, 95% CI = 1.2% to 1.6%) had ciTBIs. In patients ≥2 years, 773/11,977 (6.5%, 95% CI = 6.0% to 6.9%) of those imaged had TBIs on CT and 572/31,542 (1.8%, 95% CI = 1.7% to 2.0%) had ciTBIs. For the pediatric GCS in children <2 years old, the area under the ROC curve was 0.61 (95% CI = 0.59 to 0.64) for TBI on CT and 0.77 (95% CI = 0.73 to 0.81) for ciTBI. For the standard GCS in older children, the area under the ROC curve was 0.71 (95% CI = 0.70 to 0.73) for TBI on CT scan and 0.81 (95% CI = 0.79 to 0.83) for ciTBI.ConclusionsThe pediatric GCS for preverbal children was somewhat less accurate than the standard GCS for older children in identifying those with TBI on CT. However, the pediatric GCS for preverbal children and the standard GCS for older children were equally accurate for identifying ciTBI.
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.
dc.publisherJoint Task Force on Advanced Pediatric Life Support
dc.titlePerformance of the Pediatric Glasgow Coma Scale Score in the Evaluation of Children With Blunt Head Trauma
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollow
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelMedicine (General)
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciences
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Reviewed
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/133544/1/acem13014_am.pdf
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/133544/2/acem13014.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/acem.13014
dc.identifier.sourceAcademic Emergency Medicine
dc.identifier.citedreferenceReilly PL, Simpson DA, Sprod R, Thomas L. Assessing the conscious level in infants and young children: a paediatric version of the Glasgow Coma Scale. Childs Nerv Syst 1988; 4: 30 – 3.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceYager JY, Johnston B, Seshia SS. Coma scales in pediatric practice. Am J Dis Child 1990; 144: 1088 – 91.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTatman A, Warren A, Williams A, Powell JE, Whitehouse W. Development of a modified pediatric coma scale in intensive care practice. Arch Dis Child 1977; 77: 519 – 21.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSimpson DA, Cockington RA, Hanieh A, Raftos J, Reilly PL. Head injuries in infants and young children: the value of the Paediatric Coma Scale. Review of literature and report on a study. Childs Nerv Syst 1991; 7: 183 – 9.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMorray JP, Tyler DC, Jones TK, Stuntz JT, Lemire RJ. Coma scale for use in brain‐injured children. Crit Care Med 1984; 12: 1018 – 20.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFortune PM, Shann F. The motor response to stimulation predicts outcome as well as the full Glasgow Coma Scale in children with severe head injury. Pediatr Crit Care Med 2010; 11: 339 – 42.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAcker SN, Ross JT, Partrick DA, Nadlonek NA, Bronsert M, Bensard DD. Glasgow motor scale alone is equivalent to Glasgow Coma Scale at identifying children at risk for serious traumatic brain injury. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2014; 77: 304 – 9.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVan de Voorde P, Sabbe M, Rizopoulos D, et al. Assessing the level of consciousness in children: a plea for the Glasgow Motor subscore. Resuscitation 2008; 76: 175 – 9.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChoi SC, Narayan RK, Anderson RL, Ward JD. Enhanced specificity of prognosis in severe head injury. J Neurosurg 1988; 69: 381 – 5.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHealey C, Osler T, Rogers F, et al. Improving the Glasgow Coma Scale score: motor score alone is a better predictor. J Trauma 2003; 54: 671 – 80.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRiechers R, Ramage A, Brown W, et al. Physician knowledge of the Glasgow Coma Scale. J Neurotrauma 2005; 22: 1327 – 34.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGill MR, Reiley DG, Green SM. Interrater reliability of Glasgow Coma Scale scores in the emergency department. Ann Emerg Med 2004; 43: 215 – 23.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTeasdale G, Jennett B. Assessment of coma and impaired consciousness. A practical scale. Lancet 1974; 2: 81 – 4.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMarcin JP, Pollack MM. Triage scoring systems, severity of illness measures, and mortality prediction models in pediatric trauma. Crit Care Med 2002; 30: S457 – 67.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJoint Task Force on Advanced Pediatric Life Support, Haller A, Silverman BK. APLS: The Pediatric Emergency Medicine Course. 2nd ed. Elk Grove Village, IL: Joint Task Force on Advanced Pediatric Life Support, 1993.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRaimondi AJ, Hirschauer J. Head injury in the infant and toddler. Coma scoring and outcome scale. Childs Brain 1984; 11: 12 – 35.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGedeit R. Head injury. Pediatr Rev 2001; 22: 118 – 24.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJames H. Neurologic evaluation and support in the child with an acute brain injury. Pediatr Ann 1986; 15: 16 – 22.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHolmes JF, Palchak MJ, Conklin MJ, Kuppermann N. Performance of the pediatric Glasgow Coma Scale in children with blunt head trauma. Acad Emerg Med 2005; 12: 814 – 9.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKuppermann N, Holmes JF, Dayan PS, et al. Identification of children at very low risk of clinically‐important brain injuries after head trauma: a prospective cohort study. Lancet 2009; 374: 1160 – 70.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLandis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977; 33: 159 – 74.
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.