How Should Retirement Plans Be Organized?
dc.contributor.author | Avci, Sureyya Burcu | |
dc.contributor.author | Narayanan, M.P. | |
dc.contributor.author | Seyhun, H. Nejat | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2016-10-04T12:59:53Z | |
dc.date.available | 2016-10-04T12:59:53Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2016-10 | |
dc.identifier | 1332 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Forthcoming in NYU Journal of Law and Business Vol. 13 No. 2, 2017 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/133960 | |
dc.description.abstract | Americans have a tough time saving for their retirement. To make matters worse, the move from defined benefit (DB) to defined contribution plans (DC) over the years has required greater investor sophistication, discipline, and sound investment advice. Unfortunately, the current rules regarding investment advice for defined contribution plans do not address the two critical deficiencies of the current system, namely opacity and conflicts of interest. We propose that one-master standard be instituted along with strict transparency requirements to control the conflicts of interest and improve retirement savings advice. We also recommend that only passive, well-diversified index funds for stocks and bonds should qualify as retirement vehicles. | en_US |
dc.subject | Defined contribution plans | en_US |
dc.subject | pension funds | en_US |
dc.subject | investment advice | en_US |
dc.subject | transparency | en_US |
dc.subject | conflict of interest | en_US |
dc.title | How Should Retirement Plans Be Organized? | en_US |
dc.type | Working Paper | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevel | Finance | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbtoplevel | Business | |
dc.contributor.affiliationum | Ross School of Business | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationumcampus | Ann Arbor | |
dc.description.bitstreamurl | http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/133960/1/1332_Avci.pdf | |
dc.description.bitstreamurl | http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/133960/4/1332_Avci_Oct2016.pdf | |
dc.description.filedescription | Description of 1332_Avci_Oct2016.pdf : October 2016 revision | |
dc.owningcollname | Business, Stephen M. Ross School of - Working Papers Series |
Files in this item
Remediation of Harmful Language
The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.
Accessibility
If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.