Show simple item record

Niche and fitness differences relate the maintenance of diversity to ecosystem function: reply

dc.contributor.authorCarroll, Ian T.
dc.contributor.authorCardinale, Bradley J.
dc.contributor.authorNisbet, Roger M.
dc.date.accessioned2016-10-17T21:17:43Z
dc.date.available2016-10-17T21:17:43Z
dc.date.issued2012-06
dc.identifier.citationCarroll, Ian T.; Cardinale, Bradley J.; Nisbet, Roger M. (2012). "Niche and fitness differences relate the maintenance of diversity to ecosystem function: reply." Ecology 93(6): 1487-1491.
dc.identifier.issn0012-9658
dc.identifier.issn1939-9170
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/134128
dc.publisherEcological Society of America
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.
dc.titleNiche and fitness differences relate the maintenance of diversity to ecosystem function: reply
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollow
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelEcology and Evolutionary Biology
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelScience
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Reviewed
dc.contributor.affiliationumUniversity of Michigan, School of Natural Resources and Environment, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109 USA.
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Ecology, Evolution and Marine Biology, University of California, Santa Barbara, California 93106 USA.
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/134128/1/ecy20129361487.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1890/11-0792.1a
dc.identifier.sourceEcology
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAdler, P. B., J. Hille Ris Lambers, and J. M. Levine. 2007. A niche for neutrality. Ecology Letters 10: 95 – 104.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCardinale, B. J. 2011. Biodiversity improves water quality through niche partitioning. Nature 472: 86 – 89.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCardinale, B. J., K. L. Matulich, D. U. Hooper, J. E. Byrnes, E. Duffy, L. Gamfeldt, P. Balvanera, M. I. O’Connor, and A. Gonzalez. 2011. The functional role of producer diversity in ecosystems. American Journal of Botany 98: 572 – 592.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCarroll, I. T., B. J. Cardinale, and R. M. Nisbet. 2011. Niche and fitness differences relate the maintenance of diversity to ecosystem function. Ecology 92: 1157 – 1165.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChesson, P. 1990. MacArthur’s consumer–resource model. Theoretical Population Biology 37: 26 – 38.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChesson, P. 2000. Mechanisms of maintenance of species diversity. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 31: 343 – 366.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGravel, D., T. Bell, C. Barbera, T. Bouvier, T. Pommier, P. Venail, and N. Mouquet. 2011. Experimental niche evolution alters the strength of the diversity–productivity relationship. Nature 469: 89 – 92.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLaw, R., and J. C. Blackford. 1992. Self-assembling food webs: a global viewpoint of coexistence of species in Lotka-Volterra communities. Ecology 73: 567 – 578.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLoreau, M., and A. Hector. 2001. Partitioning selection and complementarity in biodiversity experiments. Nature 412: 72 – 76.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLoreau, M., S. Naeem, P. Inchausti, J. Bengtsson, J. P. Grime, A. Hector, D. U. Hooper, M. A. Huston, D. Raffaelli, B. Schmid, D. Tilman, and D. A. Wardle. 2001. Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning: current knowledge and future challenges. Science 294: 804 – 808.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLoreau, M., J. Sapijanskas, F. Isbell, and A. Hector. 2012. Niche and fitness differences relate the maintenance of diversity to ecosystem function: comment. Ecology 93: 1482 – 1487.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMaynard Smith, J. 1974. Models in ecology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMcKane, R. B., D. F. Grigal, and M. P. Russelle. 1990. Spatiotemporal differences in N-15 uptake and the organization of an old-field plant community. Ecology 71: 1126 – 1132.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTilman, D., D. Lehman, and K. Thompson. 1997. Plant diversity and ecosystem productivity: theoretical considerations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 94: 1857 – 1861.
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.