View Item 

Show simple item record

Motivations for Political Discussion: Antecedents and Consequences on Civic Engagement
dc.contributor.authorZúñiga, Homero
dc.contributor.authorValenzuela, Sebastián
dc.contributor.authorWeeks, Brian E.
dc.date.accessioned2016-10-17T21:20:27Z
dc.date.available2017-12-01T21:54:12Zen
dc.date.issued2016-10
dc.identifier.citationZúñiga, Homero ; Valenzuela, Sebastián ; Weeks, Brian E. (2016). "Motivations for Political Discussion: Antecedents and Consequences on Civic Engagement." Human Communication Research 42(4): 533-552.
dc.identifier.issn0360-3989
dc.identifier.issn1468-2958
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/134278
dc.publisherWiley Subscription Services, Inc.
dc.subject.otherPolitical Discussion
dc.subject.otherCivic Participation
dc.subject.otherCivic Motivations for Discussion
dc.subject.otherSocial Motivations for Discussion
dc.subject.otherMotivations for Political Discussion
dc.titleMotivations for Political Discussion: Antecedents and Consequences on Civic Engagement
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollow
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelCommunications
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelSocial Sciences
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Reviewed
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/134278/1/hcre12086.pdf
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/134278/2/hcre12086_am.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/hcre.12086
dc.identifier.sourceHuman Communication Research
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRyfe, D. M. ( 2006 ). Narrative and deliberation in small group forums. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 34, 72 – 93.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRojas, H., Shah, D. V., Cho, J., Schmierbach, M., Keum, H., & Gil de Zúñiga, H. ( 2005 ). Media dialogue: Perceiving and addressing community problems. Mass Communication & Society, 8, 93 – 110.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRubin, R. B., Perse, E. M., & Barbato, C. A. ( 1988 ). Conceptualization and measurement of interpersonal communication motives. Human Communication Research, 14, 602 – 628.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSaldaña, M., McGregor, S., & Gil de Zúñiga, H. ( 2015 ). Social media as a public space for politics: Cross‐national comparison of news consumption and participatory behaviors in the United States and the United Kingdom. International Journal of Communication, 9, 3304 – 3326.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSchutz, W. C. ( 1966 ). The interpersonal underworld. Palo Alto, CA: Science and Behavior Books.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSchmitt‐Beck, R., & Lup, O. ( 2013 ). Seeking the soul of democracy: A review of recent research into citizens’ political talk culture. Swiss Political Science Review, 19, 513 – 538. doi: 10.1111/spsr.12051
dc.identifier.citedreferenceShah, D. V., Cho, J., Eveland, W. P., Jr., & Kwak, N. ( 2005 ). Information and expression in a digital age modeling Internet effects on civic participation. Communication Research, 32 ( 5 ), 531 – 565.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSinclair, B. ( 2012 ). The social citizen: Peer networks and political behavior. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSchlozman, K. L., Verba, S., & Brady, H. E. ( 1999 ). Civic participation and the equality problem. In T. Skocpol & M. Fiorina (Eds.), Civic Engagement in American Democracy (pp. 427 – 460 ). Washington, DC and New York, NY: Brookings Institution Press and Russell Sage Foundation.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSkocpol, T., & Fiorina, M. P. (Eds.) ( 2004 ). Civic engagement in American democracy. Brookings Institution Press.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceToka, G. ( 2010 ). The impact of everyday political talk on involvement, knowledge and informed voting. In M. Wolf, L. Morales & K. Ikeda (Eds.), Political discussion in modern democracies: A comparative perspective (pp. 129 – 144 ). London, England: Routledge.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTouré‐Tillery, M., & Fishbach, A. ( 2014 ). How to measure motivation: A guide for the experimental social psychologist. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 8/7, 328 – 341. doi: 10.1111/spc3.12110
dc.identifier.citedreferenceUlbig, S. G., & Funk, C. L. ( 1999 ). Conflict avoidance and political participation. Political Behavior, 21, 265 – 282.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceUslaner, E. M., & Conley, R. S. ( 2003 ). Civic engagement and particularized trust the ties that bind people to their ethnic communities. American Politics Research, 31 ( 4 ), 331 – 360.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceValenzuela, S., & Bachmann, I. ( 2015 ). Pride, anger, and cross‐cutting talk: A three‐country study of emotions and disagreement in informal political discussions. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 27 ( 4 ), 544 – 564. doi: 10.1093/ijpor/edv040
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVerba, S., Schlozman, K. L., & Brady, H. E. ( 1995 ). Voice and equality: Civic voluntarism in American politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWalsh, K. C. ( 2004 ). Talking about politics: Informal groups and social identity in American life. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWatson, N., & Wooden, M. ( 2006 ). Modeling longitudinal survey response: The experience of the HILDA survey. Paper presented at the ACSPRI Social Science Methodology Conference, Sydney, Australia. Retrieved from http://old.acspri.org.au/conference2006/proceedings
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWeeks, B. E., Ardèvol‐Abreu, A., & Gil de Zúñiga, H. ( 2015 ). Online influence? Social media use, opinion leadership, and political persuasion. International Journal of Public Opinion Research. doi: 10.1093/ijpor/edv050
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWilhelm, A. G. ( 2000 ). Democracy in the digital age: Challenges to political life in cyberspace. London, England: Routledge.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWojcieszak, M., & Mutz, D. C. ( 2009 ). Online groups and political discourse: Do online discussion spaces facilitate exposure to political disagreement? Journal of Communication, 59, 40 – 56.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceThe American Association for Public Opinion Research [ AAPOR ]. ( 2011 ). Standard definitions: Final dispositions of case codes and outcome rates for surveys (7th ed.). Deerfield, IL: AAPOR.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBosnjak, M., Das, M., & Lynn, P. ( 2016 ). Symposium issue on methods for probability‐based online and mixed‐mode panels. Social Science Computer Review, 34 ( 1 ), 3 – 7.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBoulianne, S. ( 2009 ). Does Internet use affect engagement? A meta‐analysis of research. Political Communication, 26, 193 – 211.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBrundidge, J., Garrett, R. K., Rojas, H., & Gil de Zúñiga, H. ( 2014 ). Political participation and ideological news online: “Differential gains” and “differential losses” in a presidential election cycle. Mass Communication and Society, 17 ( 4 ), 464 – 486.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBryce, J. ( 1888/1973 ). The American commonwealth (Vol. 3 ). London, England: Macmillan.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCho, J., Shah, D. V., McLeod, J. M., McLeod, D. M., Scholl, R. M., & Gotlieb, M. R. ( 2009 ). Campaigns, reflection, and deliberation: Advancing an O‐S‐R‐O‐R model of communication effects. Communication Theory, 19 ( 1 ), 66 – 88.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCohen, J. ( 1989 ). Deliberation and democratic legitimacy. In A. Hamlin & P. Pettit (Eds.), The good polity (pp. 17 – 34 ). Oxford, England: Blackwell.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceConover, P. J., Searing, D. D., & Crewe, I. M. ( 2002 ). The deliberative potential of political discussion. British Journal of Political Science, 32, 21 – 62.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDelli Carpini, M. X., Cook, F. L., & Jacobs, L. R. ( 2004 ). Public deliberation, discursive participation, and citizen engagement: A review of the empirical literature. Annual Review of Political Science, 7, 315 – 344.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDelli Carpini, M., & Keeter, S. ( 1996 ). What Americans know about politics and why it matters. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDiehl, T., Weeks, B. E., & Gil de Zúñiga, H. ( 2015 ). Political persuasion on social media: Tracing direct and indirect effects of news use and social interaction. New Media & Society. doi: 10.1177/1461444815616224
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEliasoph, N. ( 1998 ). Avoiding politics: How Americans produce apathy in everyday life. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEveland, W. P., & Hively, M. H. ( 2009 ). Political discussion frequency, network size, and “heterogeneity” of discussion as predictors of political knowledge and participation. Journal of Communication, 59 ( 2 ), 205 – 224.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEveland, W. P., Jr., Morey, A. C., & Hutchens, M. J. ( 2011 ). Beyond deliberation: New directions for the study of informal political conversation from a communication perspective. Journal of Communication, 61, 1082 – 1103.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEveland, W. P., Jr., Hutchens, M. J., & Morey, A. C. ( 2013 ). Political network size and its antecedents and consequences. Political Communication, 30, 371 – 394.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFishkin, J. ( 1995 ). The voice of the people. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFreelon, D. ( 2010 ). Analyzing online political discussion using three models of democratic communication. New Media & Society, 12, 1172 – 1190.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGastil, J. ( 2008 ). Political communication and deliberation. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGil de Zúñiga, H. ( 2015a ). Citizenship, social media, and big data current and future research in the social sciences. Social Science Computer Review. doi: 10.1177/0894439315619589
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGil de Zúñiga, H. ( 2015b ). Toward a European public sphere? The promise and perils of modern democracy in the age of digital and social media. International Journal of Communication, 9, 3152 – 3160.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGil de Zúñiga, G., Bachmann, I., Hsu, C. S., & Brundidge, J. ( 2013 ). Expressive versus consumptive blog use: Implications for interpersonal discussion and political participation. International Journal of Communication, 7, 1538 – 1539.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGil de Zúñiga, H., Jung, N., & Valenzuela, S. ( 2012 ). Social media use for news and individuals’ social capital, civic engagement and political participation. Journal of Computer‐Mediated Communication, 17 ( 3 ), 319 – 336.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGil de Zúñiga, H., & Valenzuela, S. ( 2011 ). The mediating path to a stronger citizenship: Online and offline networks, weak ties, and civic engagement. Communication Research, 38, 397 – 421.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGuerrero, L. K., Andersen, P. A., & Afifi, W. A. ( 2010 ). Close encounters: Communication in relationships. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHabermas, J. ( 1984 ). The theory of communicative action. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHalpern, D., & Gibbs, J. ( 2013 ). Social media as a catalyst for online deliberation? Exploring the affordances of Facebook and YouTube for political expression. Computers in Human Behavior, 29, 1159 – 1168.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHill, K. A., & Hughes, J. E. ( 1998 ). Cyberpolitics: Citizen activism in the age of the Internet. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHo, S. S., & McLeod, D. M. ( 2008 ). Social‐psychological influences on opinion expression in face‐to‐face and computer‐mediated communication. Communication Research, 35, 190 – 207.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHolbert, R. L., & Grill, C. ( 2015 ). Clarifying and expanding the use of confirmatory factor analysis in journalism and mass communication research. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 92 ( 2 ), 292 – 319. doi: 10.1177/1077699015583718
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHuckfeldt, R., & Sprague, J. ( 1987 ). Networks in context: The social flow of political information. American Political Science Review, 81, 1197 – 1216.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHuckfeldt, R., & Sprague, J. ( 1991 ). Discussant effects on vote choice: Intimacy, structure, and interdependence. Journal of Politics, 53, 122 – 160.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceIyengar, S., & Hahn, K. S. ( 2009 ). Red Media, Blue Media: Evidence of ideological selectivity in media use. Journal of Communication, 59, 19 – 39. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.01402.x
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJung, N., Kim, Y., & Gil de Zúniga, H. ( 2011 ). The mediating role of knowledge and efficacy in the effects of communication on political participation. Mass Communication and Society, 14 ( 4 ), 407 – 430.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKatz, E., & Lazarsfeld, P. ( 1955 ). Personal influence. New York, NY: The Free Press.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKim, J., & Kim, E. J. ( 2008 ). Theorizing dialogic deliberation: Everyday talk as communicative action and dialogue. Communication Theory, 18, 51 – 70. doi: 10.1111/j/1468-2885.2007.00313.x
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKim, J., Wyatt, R. O., & Katz, E. ( 1999 ). News, talk, opinion, participation: The part played by conversation in deliberative democracy. Political Communication, 16, 361 – 385.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKlofstad, C. A. ( 2011 ). Civic talk: Peers politics, and the future of democracy. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKraemer, H. C., & Blasey, C. M. ( 2004 ). Centring in regression analyses: A strategy to prevent errors in statistical inference. International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research, 13 ( 3 ), 141 – 151.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKrosnick, J. A., & Alwin, D. F. ( 1989 ). Aging and susceptibility to attitude change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 416 – 425.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKwak, N., Williams, A. E., Wang, X., & Lee, H. ( 2005 ). Talking politics and engaging politics: An examination of the interactive relationships between structural features of political talk and discussion engagement. Communication Research, 32, 87 – 111.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMansbridge, J. ( 1999 ). Everyday talk in the deliberative system. In S. Macedo (Ed.), Deliberative politics: Essays on democracy and disagreement (pp. 211 – 242 ). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMcClurg, S. D. ( 2003 ). Social networks and political participation: The role of social interaction in explaining political participation. Political Research Quarterly, 56, 448 – 464.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMcCoy, M. L., & Scully, P. L. ( 2002 ). Deliberative dialogue to expand civic engagement: What kind of talk does democracy need? National Civic Review, 91, 117 – 135.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMutz, D. C. ( 2002 ). The consequences of cross‐cutting networks for political participation. American Journal of Political Science, 46, 838 – 855.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePasek, J., Kenski, K., Romer, D., & Jamieson, K. H. ( 2006 ). America’s youth and community engagement how use of mass media is related to civic activity and political awareness in 14‐to 22‐year‐olds. Communication Research, 33 ( 3 ), 115 – 135.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePattie, C., & Johnston, R. ( 2009 ). Conversation, disagreement and political participation. Political Behavior, 31, 261 – 285.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePew Internet & American Life Project. ( 2013 ). About our survey methodology in detail. Retrieved from http://people‐press.org/methodology/about/
dc.identifier.citedreferencePrior, M. ( 2007 ). Post‐broadcast democracy: How media choice increases inequality in political involvement and polarizes elections. Cambridge, NY: Cambridge University Press.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRojas, H. ( 2015 ). Egocentric publics and perceptions of the worlds around us. In H. Gil de Zúñiga (Ed.), New agendas in communication: New technologies & civic engagement (pp. 93 – 102 ). New York, NY: Routledge.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRojas, H. ( 2008 ). Strategy versus understanding: How orientations toward political conversation influence political engagement. Communication Research, 35, 452 – 480.
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
hcre12086.pdf
Size:
362.7KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open
Name:
hcre12086_am.pdf
Size:
628.7KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.