View Item 

Show simple item record

Partisan Provocation: The Role of Partisan News Use and Emotional Responses in Political Information Sharing in Social Media
dc.contributor.authorHasell, A.
dc.contributor.authorWeeks, Brian E.
dc.date.accessioned2016-10-17T21:20:33Z
dc.date.available2017-12-01T21:54:12Zen
dc.date.issued2016-10
dc.identifier.citationHasell, A.; Weeks, Brian E. (2016). "Partisan Provocation: The Role of Partisan News Use and Emotional Responses in Political Information Sharing in Social Media." Human Communication Research 42(4): 641-661.
dc.identifier.issn0360-3989
dc.identifier.issn1468-2958
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/134283
dc.publisherWiley Subscription Services, Inc.
dc.subject.otherInformation Sharing
dc.subject.otherSocial Media
dc.subject.otherEmotion
dc.subject.otherPartisan News Media
dc.titlePartisan Provocation: The Role of Partisan News Use and Emotional Responses in Political Information Sharing in Social Media
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollow
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelCommunications
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelSocial Sciences
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Reviewed
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/134283/1/hcre12092_am.pdf
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/134283/2/hcre12092.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/hcre.12092
dc.identifier.sourceHuman Communication Research
dc.identifier.citedreferencePrior, M. ( 2009 ). The immensely inflated news audience: Assessing bias in self‐reported news exposure. Public Opinion Quarterly, 73 ( 1 ), 130 – 143. doi: 10.1093/poq/nfp002
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRoseman, I. J., Wiest, C., & Swartz, T. S. ( 1994 ). Phenomenology, behaviors, and goals differentiate discrete emotions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 206 – 221. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.67.2.206
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSchudson, M. ( 2003 ). The sociology of news. New York: WW Norton & Company.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceShoshani, A., & Slone, M. ( 2008 ). The drama of media coverage of terrorism: Emotional and attitudinal impact on the audience. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 31, 627 – 640. doi: 10.1177/0165025408090976
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSlater, M. D. ( 2007 ). Reinforcing spirals: The mutual influence of media selectivity and media effects and their impact on individual behavior and social identity. Communication Theory, 17, 281 – 303. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2885.2007.00296.x
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSmith, C. A., & Ellsworth, P. C. ( 1985 ). Patterns of cognitive appraisal in emotion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 813 – 838. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.48.4.813
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSmith, G., & Searles, K. ( 2014 ). Who let the (attack) dogs out? New evidence for partisan media effects. Public Opinion Quarterly, 78 ( 1 ), 71 – 99. doi: 10.1093/poq/nft082
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSoroka, S., & McAdams, S. ( 2015 ). News, politics, and negativity. Political Communication, 32 ( 1 ), 1 – 22. doi: 10.1080/10584609.2014.881942
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStieglitz, S., & Dang‐Xuan, L. ( 2013 ). Emotions and information diffusion in social media—Sentiment of microblogs and sharing behavior. Journal of Management Information Systems, 29 ( 4 ), 217 – 248. doi: 10.2753/MIS0742-1222290408
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStroud, N. ( 2010 ). Polarization and partisan selective exposure. Journal of Communication, 60 ( 3 ), 556 – 576. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2010.01497.x
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStroud, N. J. ( 2011 ). Niche news: The politics of news choice. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStroud, N. J., Scacco, J. M., Muddiman, A., & Curry, A. L. ( 2015 ). Changing deliberative norms on news organizations’ Facebook sites. Journal of Computer‐Mediated Communication, 20, 188 – 203. doi: 10.1111/jcc4.12104
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTrussler, M., & Soroka, S. ( 2014 ). Consumer demand for cynical and negative news frames. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 19 ( 3 ), 360 – 379. doi: 10.1177/1940161214524832
dc.identifier.citedreferenceValentino, N. A., Brader, T., Groenendyk, E. W., Gregorowicz, K., & Hutchings, V. L. ( 2011 ). Election night’s alright for fighting: The role of emotions in political participation. Journal of Politics, 73, 156 – 170. doi: 10.1017/S0022381610000939
dc.identifier.citedreferenceValentino, N. A., Hutchings, V. L., Banks, A. J., & Davis, A. K. ( 2008 ). Is a worried citizen a good citizen? Emotions, political information seeking, and Llearning via the Internet. Political Psychology, 29 ( 2 ), 247 – 273. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9221.2008.00625.x
dc.identifier.citedreferenceValenzuela, S. ( 2013 ). Unpacking the use of social media for protest behavior: The roles of information, opinion expression, and activism. American Behavioral Scientist, 57 ( 7 ), 920 – 942. doi: 10.1177/0002764213479375
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWeeks, B. E. ( 2015 ). Emotions, partisanship, and misperceptions. How anger and anxiety moderate the effect of partisan bias on susceptibility to political misinformation. Journal of Communication, 65, 699 – 719. doi: 10.1111/jcom.12164
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWeeks, B. E., & Holbert, R. L. ( 2013 ). Predicting dissemination of news content in social media: A focus on reception, friending, and partisanship. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 90 ( 2 ), 212 – 232. doi: 10.1177/1077699013482906
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWojcieszak, M., Bimber, B., Feldman, L., & Stroud, N. J. ( 2015 ). Partisan news and political participation: Exploring mediated relationships. Political Communication, 33 ( 2 ), 241 – 260. doi: 10.1080/10584609.2015.1051608
dc.identifier.citedreferenceArceneaux, K., & Johnson, M. ( 2013 ). Changing minds or changing channels?: Partisan news in an age of choice. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceArceneaux, K., Johnson, M., & Cryderman, J. ( 2013 ). Communication, persuasion, and the conditioning value of selective exposure: Like minds may unite and divide but they mostly tune out. Political Communication, 30 ( 2 ), 213 – 231. doi: 10.1080/10584609.2012.737424
dc.identifier.citedreferenceArpan, L. M., & Nabi, R. L. ( 2011 ). Exploring anger in the hostile media process: Effects on news preferences and source evaluation. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 88, 5 – 22. doi: 10.1177/107769901108800101
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBaguley, T. ( 2012 ). Serious stats: A guide to advanced statistics for the behavioral sciences. Basingstoke, England: Palgrave Macmillan.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBaum, M. A., & Groeling, T. ( 2008 ). New media and the polarization of American political discourse. Political Communication, 25, 345 – 365. doi: 10.1017/S0022381608081061
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBerger, J. ( 2011 ). Arousal increases social transmission of information. Psychological Science, 22 ( 7 ), 891 – 893. doi: 10.1177/0956797611413294
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBerger, J., & Milkman, K. L. ( 2012 ). What makes online content viral? Journal of Marketing Research, 49 ( 2 ), 192 – 205. doi: 10.1509/jmr.10.0353
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBlanton, H., Strauts, E., & Perez, M. ( 2012 ). Partisan identification as a predictor of cortisol response to election news. Political Communication, 29, 447 – 460. doi: 10.1080/10584609.2012.736239
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBucy, E. P. ( 2003 ). Emotion, presidential communication, and traumatic news: Processing the World Trade Center attacks. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 8, 76 – 96. doi: 10.1177/1081180X03256801
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBudak, C., Goel, S., & Rao, J. M. ( 2014 ). Fair and balanced? Quantifying media bias through crowdsourced content analysis. Retrieved from http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/Papers.cfm?abstract_id=2526461
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCarr, D. & Arango, T. ( 2010, 9 January). A Fox chief at the pinnacle of media and politics. The New York Times. Retrieved 1 September 2014 from http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/10/business/media/10ailes.html
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCarver, C. S., & Harmon‐Jones, E. ( 2009 ). Anger is an approach‐related affect: Evidence and implications. Psychological Bulletin, 135, 183 – 204. doi: 10.1037/a0013965
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLazarus, R. S. ( 1991 ). Emotion and adaptation. New York: Oxford University Press.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCho, J., Boyle, M. P., Keum, H., Shevy, M. D., McLeod, D. M., Shah, D. V., & Pan, Z. ( 2003 ). Media, terrorism, and emotionality: Emotional differences in media content and public reactions to the September 11th terrorist attacks. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 47, 309 – 327. doi: 10.1207/s15506878jobem4703_1
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChoi, J., & Lee, J. K. ( 2015 ). Investigating the effects of news sharing and political interest on social media network heterogeneity. Computers in Human Behavior, 44, 258 – 266. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2014.11.029
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDelli Carpini, M. X., Cook, F. L., & Jacobs, L. R. ( 2004 ). Public deliberation, discursive participation, and citizen engagement: A review of the empirical literature. Annual Review of Political Science, 7, 315 – 344. doi: 10.1146/annurev.polisci.7.121003.091630
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEliasoph, N. ( 1998 ). Avoiding politics: How Americans produce apathy in everyday life. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFeldman, L. ( 2011 ). Partisan differences in opinionated news perceptions: A test of the hostile media effect. Political Behavior, 33, 407 – 432. doi: 10.1007/s11109-010-9139-4
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFrijda, N. H. ( 1986 ). The emotions. New York: Cambridge University Press.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGarrett, R. K., Gvirsman, S., Johnson, B., Tsfati, Y., Neo, R., & Dal, A. ( 2014 ). Implications of pro‐ and counterattitudinal information exposure for affective polarization. Human Communication Research, 40 ( 3 ), 309 – 332. doi: 10.1111/hcre.12028
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGarrett, R. K., & Stroud, N. J. ( 2014 ). Partisan paths to exposure diversity: Differences in pro‐ and counterattitudinal news consumption. Journal of Communication, 64, 680 – 701. doi: 10.1111/jcom.12105
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGervais, B. T. ( 2014 ). Following the news? Reception of uncivil partisan media and the use of incivility in political expression. Political Communication, 31, 564 – 583. doi: 10.1080/10584609.2013.852640
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGibson, R., & Cantijoch, M. ( 2013 ). Conceptualizing and measuring participation in the age of the internet: Is online political engagement really different to offline? The Journal of Politics, 75 ( 03 ), 701 – 716. doi: 10.1017/S0022381613000431
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGil de Zúñiga, H., Jung, N., & Valenzuela, S. ( 2012 ). Social media use for news and individuals’ social capital, civic engagement and political participation. Journal of Computer‐Mediated Communication, 17 ( 3 ), 319 – 336. doi: 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2012.01574.x
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGil de Zúñiga, H., Molyneux, L., & Zheng, P. ( 2014 ). Social media, political expression, and political participation: Panel analysis of lagged and concurrent relationships. Journal of Communication, 64, 612 – 634. doi: 10.1111/jcom.12103
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGlynn, C. J., Huge, M. E., & Hoffman, L. H. ( 2012 ). All the news that’s fit to post: A profile of news use on social networking sites. Computers in Human Behavior, 28 ( 1 ), 113 – 119. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2011.08.017
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGoodall, C. E., Slater, M. D., & Myers, T. A. ( 2013 ). Fear and anger responses to local news coverage of alcohol‐related crimes, accidents, and injuries: Explaining news effects on policy support using a representative sample of messages and people. Journal of Communication, 63, 373 – 392. doi: 10.1111/jcom.12020
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGraber, D. A. ( 1996 ). Say it with pictures. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 546, 85 – 96. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/1048172.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGross, K., & Brewer, P. R. ( 2007 ). Sore losers: News frames, policy debates, and emotions. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 12, 122 – 133. doi: 10.1177/1081180X06297231
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHalpern, D., & Gibbs, J. ( 2013 ). Social media as a catalyst for online deliberation? Exploring the affordances of Facebook and YouTube for political expression. Computers in Human Behavior, 29 ( 3 ), 1159 – 1168. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2012.10.008
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHayes, A. F. ( 2005 ). Statistical methods for communication science. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHayes, A. F. ( 2013 ). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis. New York: The Guilford Press.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHo, S. S., & McLeod, D. M. ( 2008 ). Social‐psychological influences on opinion expression in face‐to‐face and computer‐mediated communication. Communication Research, 35, 190 – 207. doi: 10.1177/0093650207313159
dc.identifier.citedreferenceIyengar, S. ( 1991 ). Is anyone responsible?: How television frames political issues. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceIyengar, S., Sood, G., & Lelkes, Y. ( 2012 ). Affect, not ideology: A social identity perspective on polarization. Public Opinion Quarterly, 76, 405 – 431. doi: 10.1093/poq/nfs038
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKatz, E., & Lazarsfeld, P. F. ( 1955 ). Personal influence: The part played by people in the flow of mass communications. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKim, Y., Chen, H., & Gil de Zúñiga, H. ( 2013 ). Stumbling upon news on the internet: Effects of incidental news exposure and relative entertainment use on political participation. Computers in Human Behavior, 29 ( 6 ), 2607 – 2614.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKnobloch‐Westerwick, S., & Meng, J. ( 2011 ). Reinforcement of the political self through selective exposure to political messages. Journal of Communication, 61 ( 2 ), 349 – 368. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2011.01543.x
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLee, C. S., & Ma, L. ( 2012 ). News sharing in social media: The effect of gratifications and prior experience. Computers in Human Behavior, 28 ( 2 ), 331 – 339. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2011.10.002
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLerner, J. S., & Keltner, D. ( 2001 ). Fear, anger, and risk. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 146 – 159. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.81.1.146
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLevendusky, M. ( 2013a ). Partisan media exposure and attitudes toward the opposition. Political Communication, 30 ( 4 ), 565 – 581. doi: 10.1080/10584609.2012.737435
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLevendusky, M. ( 2013b ). How partisan media polarize America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMacKuen, M., Wolak, J., Keele, L., & Marcus, G. E. ( 2010 ). Civic engagements: Resolute partisanship or reflective deliberation. American Journal of Political Science, 54, 440 – 458. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2010.00440.x
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMarcus, G. E. ( 2000 ). Emotions in politics. Annual Review of Political Science, 3, 221 – 250.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMarcus, G. E., MacKuen, M., & Neuman, W. R. ( 2011 ). Parsimony and complexity: Developing and testing theories of affective intelligence. Political Psychology, 32, 323 – 336. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9221.2010.00806.x
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMarcus, G. E., Neuman, W. R., & MacKuen, M. ( 2000 ). Affective intelligence and political judgment. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMessing, S., & Westwood, S. J. ( 2014 ). Selective exposure in the age of social media: Endorsements trump partisan source affiliation when selecting news online. Communication Research, 41, 1042 – 1063. doi: 10.1177/0093650212466406
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMutz, D. C., & Mondak, J. J. ( 2006 ). The workplace as a context for cross‐cutting political discourse. Journal of Politics, 68, 140 – 155. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2508.2006.00376.x
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNabi, R. L. ( 1999 ). A cognitive‐functional model for the effects of discrete negative emotions on information processing, attitude change, and recall. Communication Theory, 9, 292 – 320. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2885.1999.tb00172.x
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNabi, R. L. ( 2003 ). Exploring the framing effects of emotion: Do discrete emotions differentially influence information accessibility, information seeking, and policy preference? Communication Research, 30, 224 – 247. doi: 10.1177/0093650202250881
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNabi, R. L. ( 2010 ). The case for emphasizing discrete emotions in communication research. Communication Monographs, 77, 153 – 159. doi: 10.1080/03637751003790444
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNoelle‐Neumann, E. ( 1993 ). The spiral of silence: Public opinion – Our social skin. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceO’Reilly, B. ( 2006 ). Culture warrior. New York: Three Rivers Press.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePark, C. S. ( 2015 ). Applying “negativity bias” to Twitter: Negative news on Twitter, emotions, and political learning. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 12 ( 4 ), 342 – 359. doi: 10.1080/19331681.2015.1100225
dc.identifier.citedreferencePeters, C. ( 2011 ). Emotion aside or emotional side? Crafting an experience of involvement in the news. Journalism, 12 ( 3 ), 297 – 316. doi: 10.1177/1464884910388224
dc.identifier.citedreferencePew Research Center. ( 2014a ). 8 key takeaway about social media and news. Retrieved from http://www.journalism.org/2014/03/26/8‐key‐takeaways‐about‐social‐media‐and‐news/
dc.identifier.citedreferencePew Research Center. ( 2014b ). Political polarization and media habits. Retrieved from http://www.journalism.org/2014/10/21/political‐polarization‐media‐habits/
dc.identifier.citedreferencePew Research Center. ( 2015, 8 October). Social media usage: 2005–2015. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/2015/10/08/social‐networking‐usage‐2005‐2015/
dc.identifier.citedreferencePrior, M. ( 2007 ). Post‐broadcast democracy: How media choice increases inequality in political involvement and polarizes elections. New York: Cambridge University Press.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePrior, M. ( 2013 ). Media and political polarization. Annual Review of Political Science, 16 ( 1 ), 101 – 127. doi: 10.1146/annurev-polisci-100711-135242
dc.identifier.citedreferenceReid, S. A. ( 2012 ). A self‐categorization explanation for the hostile media effect. Journal of Communication, 62 ( 3 ), 381 – 399. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2012.01647.x
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
hcre12092_am.pdf
Size:
674.2KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open
Name:
hcre12092.pdf
Size:
268.1KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.