View Item 

Show simple item record

Establishing quality indicators for neck dissection: Correlating the number of lymph nodes with oncologic outcomes (NRG Oncology RTOG 9501 and RTOG 0234)
dc.contributor.authorDivi, Vasu
dc.contributor.authorHarris, Jonathan
dc.contributor.authorHarari, Paul M.
dc.contributor.authorCooper, Jay S.
dc.contributor.authorMcHugh, Jonathan
dc.contributor.authorBell, Diana
dc.contributor.authorSturgis, Erich M.
dc.contributor.authorCmelak, Anthony J.
dc.contributor.authorSuntharalingam, Mohan
dc.contributor.authorRaben, David
dc.contributor.authorKim, Harold
dc.contributor.authorSpencer, Sharon A.
dc.contributor.authorLaramore, George E.
dc.contributor.authorTrotti, Andy
dc.contributor.authorFoote, Robert L.
dc.contributor.authorSchultz, Christopher
dc.contributor.authorThorstad, Wade L.
dc.contributor.authorZhang, Qiang (Ed)
dc.contributor.authorLe, Quynh Thu
dc.contributor.authorHolsinger, F. Christopher
dc.date.accessioned2016-11-18T21:23:16Z
dc.date.available2018-01-08T19:47:52Zen
dc.date.issued2016-11-15
dc.identifier.citationDivi, Vasu; Harris, Jonathan; Harari, Paul M.; Cooper, Jay S.; McHugh, Jonathan; Bell, Diana; Sturgis, Erich M.; Cmelak, Anthony J.; Suntharalingam, Mohan; Raben, David; Kim, Harold; Spencer, Sharon A.; Laramore, George E.; Trotti, Andy; Foote, Robert L.; Schultz, Christopher; Thorstad, Wade L.; Zhang, Qiang (Ed); Le, Quynh Thu; Holsinger, F. Christopher (2016). "Establishing quality indicators for neck dissection: Correlating the number of lymph nodes with oncologic outcomes (NRG Oncology RTOG 9501 and RTOG 0234)." Cancer 122(22): 3464-3471.
dc.identifier.issn0008-543X
dc.identifier.issn1097-0142
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/134433
dc.publisherWiley
dc.subject.otherneck dissection
dc.subject.otherquality indicators
dc.subject.othersurgery
dc.subject.othersurvival
dc.subject.otherhead and neck cancer
dc.titleEstablishing quality indicators for neck dissection: Correlating the number of lymph nodes with oncologic outcomes (NRG Oncology RTOG 9501 and RTOG 0234)
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollow
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPublic Health
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelOncology and Hematology
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciences
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Reviewed
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/134433/1/cncr30204_am.pdf
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/134433/2/cncr30204.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/cncr.30204
dc.identifier.sourceCancer
dc.identifier.citedreferenceByers RM. Modified neck dissection. A study of 967 cases from 1970 to 1980. Am J Surg. 1985; 150: 414 – 421.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCrile G. III. On the technique of operations upon the head and neck. Ann Surg. 1906; 44: 842 – 850.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePrandi M, Lionetto R, Bini A, et al. Prognostic evaluation of stage B colon cancer patients is improved by an adequate lymphadenectomy: results of a secondary analysis of a large scale adjuvant trial. Ann Surg. 2002; 235: 458 – 463.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSwanson RS, Compton CC, Stewart AK, et al. The prognosis of T3N0 colon cancer is dependent on the number of lymph nodes examined. Ann Surg Oncol. 2003; 10: 65 – 71.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRobbins KT, Medina JE, Wolfe GT, et al. Standardizing neck dissection terminology. Official report of the Academy’s Committee for Head and Neck Surgery and Oncology. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1991; 117: 601 – 605.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceByers RM, Wolf PF, Ballantyne AJ. Rationale for elective modified neck dissection. Head Neck Surg. 1988; 10: 160 – 167.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMartin H, Del Valle B, Ehrlich H, et al. Neck dissection. Cancer. 1951; 4: 441 – 499.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWuthrick EJ, Zhang Q, Machtay M, et al. Institutional clinical trial accrual volume and survival of patients with head and neck cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2015; 33: 156 – 164.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWong SL. Lymph node counts and survival rates after resection for colon and rectal cancer. Gastrointest Cancer Res. 2009; 3: S33 – S35.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLemmens VE, van Lijnschoten I, Janssen‐Heijnen ML, et al. Pathology practice patterns affect lymph node evaluation and outcome of colon cancer: a population‐based study. Ann Oncol. 2006; 17: 1803 – 1809.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceOstadi MA, Harnish JL, Stegienko S, et al. Factors affecting the number of lymph nodes retrieved in colorectal cancer specimens. Surg Endosc. 2007; 21: 2142 – 2146.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePatel SG, Amit M, Yen TC, et al. Lymph node density in oral cavity cancer: results of the International Consortium for Outcomes Research. Br J Cancer. 2013; 109: 2087 – 2095.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceShrime MG, Bachar G, Lea J, et al. Nodal ratio as an independent predictor of survival in squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity. Head Neck. 2009; 31: 1482 – 1488.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRyu IS, Roh JL, Cho KJ, et al. Lymph node density as an independent predictor of cancer‐specific mortality in patients with lymph node–positive laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma after laryngectomy. Head Neck. 2014; 37: 1319 – 1325.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGil Z, Carlson DL, Boyle JO, et al. Lymph node density is a significant predictor of outcome in patients with oral cancer. Cancer. 2009; 115: 5700 – 5710.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAgrama MT, Reiter D, Topham AK, et al. Node counts in neck dissection: are they useful in outcomes research? Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2001; 124: 433 – 435.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCox DR. Regression models and life tables. J R Stat Soc Ser B. 1972; 34: 187 – 229.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKalbfleisch JD, Prentice RL. The Statistical Analysis of Failure Time Data. New York, NY: Wiley; 1980.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKaplan EL, Meier P. Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations. J Am Stat Assoc. 1958; 53: 457 – 481.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHarari PM, Harris J, Kies MS, et al. Postoperative chemoradiotherapy and cetuximab for high‐risk squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: Radiation Therapy Oncology Group RTOG‐0234. J Clin Oncol. 2014; 32: 2486 – 2495.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCooper JS, Pajak TF, Forastiere AA, et al. Postoperative concurrent radiotherapy and chemotherapy for high‐risk squamous‐cell carcinoma of the head and neck. N Engl J Med. 2004; 350: 1937 – 1944.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEbrahimi A, Clark JR, Amit M, et al. Minimum nodal yield in oral squamous cell carcinoma: defining the standard of care in a multicenter international pooled validation study. Ann Surg Oncol. 2014; 21: 3049 – 3055.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEbrahimi A, Zhang WJ, Gao K, et al. Nodal yield and survival in oral squamous cancer: defining the standard of care. Cancer. 2011; 117: 2917 – 2925.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNational Quality Forum. National Voluntary Consensus Standards for Quality of Cancer Care. http://www.qualityforum.org/pdf/cancer/txAppA-Specifications_web.pdf. Accessed January 5, 2016.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChang GJ, Rodriguez‐Bigas MA, Skibber JM, et al. Lymph node evaluation and survival after curative resection of colon cancer: systematic review. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2007; 99: 433 – 441.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLe Voyer TE, Sigurdson ER, Hanlon AL, et al. Colon cancer survival is associated with increasing number of lymph nodes analyzed: a secondary survey of intergroup trial INT‐0089. J Clin Oncol. 2003; 21: 2912 – 2919.
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
cncr30204_am.pdf
Size:
1.086MB
Format:
PDF
View/Open
Name:
cncr30204.pdf
Size:
283.9KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.