View Item 

Show simple item record

Using Optimal Test Assembly Methods for Shortening Patientâ Reported Outcome Measures: Development and Validation of the Cochin Hand Function Scaleâ 6: A Scleroderma Patientâ Centered Intervention Network Cohort Study
dc.contributor.authorLevis, Alexander W.
dc.contributor.authorHarel, Daphna
dc.contributor.authorKwakkenbos, Linda
dc.contributor.authorCarrier, Marie‐eve
dc.contributor.authorMouthon, Luc
dc.contributor.authorPoiraudeau, Serge
dc.contributor.authorBartlett, Susan J.
dc.contributor.authorKhanna, Dinesh
dc.contributor.authorMalcarne, Vanessa L.
dc.contributor.authorSauve, Maureen
dc.contributor.authorvan den Ende, Cornelia H. M.
dc.contributor.authorPoole, Janet L.
dc.contributor.authorSchouffoer, Anne A.
dc.contributor.authorWelling, Joep
dc.contributor.authorThombs, Brett D.
dc.contributor.authorBaron, Murray
dc.date.accessioned2016-11-18T21:24:38Z
dc.date.available2018-01-08T19:47:53Zen
dc.date.issued2016-11
dc.identifier.citationLevis, Alexander W.; Harel, Daphna; Kwakkenbos, Linda; Carrier, Marie‐eve ; Mouthon, Luc; Poiraudeau, Serge; Bartlett, Susan J.; Khanna, Dinesh; Malcarne, Vanessa L.; Sauve, Maureen; van den Ende, Cornelia H. M.; Poole, Janet L.; Schouffoer, Anne A.; Welling, Joep; Thombs, Brett D.; Baron, Murray (2016). "Using Optimal Test Assembly Methods for Shortening Patientâ Reported Outcome Measures: Development and Validation of the Cochin Hand Function Scaleâ 6: A Scleroderma Patientâ Centered Intervention Network Cohort Study." Arthritis Care & Research 68(11): 1704-1713.
dc.identifier.issn2151-464X
dc.identifier.issn2151-4658
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/134498
dc.publisherSpringer
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.
dc.titleUsing Optimal Test Assembly Methods for Shortening Patientâ Reported Outcome Measures: Development and Validation of the Cochin Hand Function Scaleâ 6: A Scleroderma Patientâ Centered Intervention Network Cohort Study
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollow
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelGeriatrics
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciences
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Reviewed
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/134498/1/acr22893_am.pdf
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/134498/2/acr22893.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/acr.22893
dc.identifier.sourceArthritis Care & Research
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHinchcliff M, Beaumont JL, Thavarajah K, Varga J, Chung A, Podlusky S, et al. Validity of two new patientâ reported outcome measures in systemic sclerosis: Patientâ Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System 29â item health profile and Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapyâ Dyspnea Short Form. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2011; 63: 1620 â 8.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBongi SM, del Rosso A, Galluccio F, Sigismondi F, Miniati I, Conforti ML, et al. Efficacy of connective tissue massage and McMennell joint manipulation in the rehabilitative treatment of the hands in systemic sclerosis. Clin Rheumatol 2009; 28: 1167 â 73.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSmith GT, McCarthy DM, Anderson KG. On the sins of shortâ form development. Psychol Assess 2000; 12: 102 â 11.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStanton JM, Sinar EF, Balzer WK, Smith PC. Issues and strategies for reducing the length of selfâ report scales. Pers Psychol 2002; 55: 167 â 94.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKruyen PM, Emons WH, Sijtsma K. On the shortcomings of shortened tests: a literature review. Int J Test 2013; 13: 223 â 48.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGoetz C, Coste J, Lemetayer F, Rat AC, Montel S, Recchia S, et al. Item reduction based on rigorous methodological guidelines is necessary to maintain validity when shortening composite measurement scales. J Clin Epidemiol 2013; 66: 710 â 8.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJewett LR, Hudson M, Haythornthwaite JA, Heinberg L, Wigley FM, Baron M, et al. Development and validation of the briefâ satisfaction with appearance scale for systemic sclerosis. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2010; 62: 1779 â 86.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVan der Linden WJ, Hambleton RK, editors. Handbook of modern item response theory. New York: Springer; 1997.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVan der Linden WJ. Linear models for optimal test design. New York: Springer; 2006.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKuhn JT, Kiefer T. Optimal test assembly in practice: the design of the Austrian educational standards assessment in mathematics. Zeitschrift für Psychologie 2013; 221: 190 â 200.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVan den Hoogen F, Khanna D, Fransen J, Johnson SR, Baron M, Tyndall A, et al. 2013 classification criteria for systemic sclerosis: an American College of Rheumatology/European League against Rheumatism collaborative initiative. Arthritis Rheum 2013; 65: 2737 â 47.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLeRoy EC, Black C, Fleischmajer R, Jablonska S, Krieg T, Medsger TA Jr, et al. Scleroderma (systemic sclerosis): classification, subsets and pathogenesis. J Rheumatol 1988; 15: 202 â 5.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceClements P, Lachenbruch P, Siebold J, White B, Weiner S, Martin R, et al. Inter and intraobserver variability of total skin thickness score (modified Rodnan TSS) in systemic sclerosis. J Rheumatol 1995; 22: 1281 â 5.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePoiraudeau S, Chevalier X, Conrozier T, Flippo RM, Lioté F, Noël E, et al. Reliability, validity, and sensitivity to change of the Cochin Hand Functional Disability Scale in hand osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2001; 9: 570 â 7.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePoole JL, Steen VD. The use of the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) to determine physical disability in systemic sclerosis. Arthritis Rheum 1991; 4: 27 â 31.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMuthen LK, Muthen BO. Mplus user’s guide: statistical analysis with latent variables. 7th ed. Los Angeles: Muthen & Muthen; 2012.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMcDonald RP, Ho MH. Principles and practice in reporting structural equation analyses. Psychol Methods 2002; 7: 64 â 82.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceReise SP, Widaman KF, Pugh RH. Confirmatory factor analysis and item response theory: two approaches for exploring measurement invariance. Psychol Bull 1993; 114: 552 â 66.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHu L, Bentler PM. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equ Modeling 1999; 6: 1 â 55.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChen F, Curran PJ, Bollen KA, Kirby J, Paxton P. An empirical evaluation of the use of fixed cutoff points in RMSEA test statistic in structural equation models. Sociol Methods Res 2008; 36: 462 â 94.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMuraki E. A generalized partial credit model: application of an EM algorithm. Appl Psych Meas 1992; 16: 159 â 76.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVan der Linden WJ, Boekkooiâ Timminga E. A maximin model for IRTâ based test design with practical constraints. Psychometrika 1989; 54: 237 â 47.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVan der Ark LA. Stochastic ordering of the latent trait by the sum score under various polytomous IRT models. Psychometrika 2005; 70: 283 â 304.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHarel D. The effect of model misspecification for polytomous logistic adjacent category item response theory models [dissertation]. Montreal (Canada): McGill University; 2014.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWalker E, Nowacki AS. Understanding equivalence and noninferiority testing. J Gen Intern Med 2011; 26: 192 â 6.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCounsell A, Cribbie RA. Equivalence tests for comparing correlation and regression coefficients. Br J Math Stat Psychol 2015; 68: 292 â 309.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceR Core Team. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna; R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2014. URL: http://www.R-project.org/.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRizopoulos D. ltm: an R package for latent variable modeling and item response theory analyses. J Stat Softw 2006; 17:1 â 25.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDiao Q, van der Linden WJ. Automated test assembly usinglp_solve version 5.5 in R. Appl Psych Meas 2011; 35: 398 â 409.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBren L. The importance of patientâ reported outcomes: it’s all about the patients. FDA Consum 2006; 40: 26 â 32.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFairclough DL. Patient reported outcomes as endpoints in medical research. Stat Methods Med Res 2004; 13: 115 â 38.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRumsfeld JS, Ho PM. Depression and cardiovascular disease: a call for recognition. Circulation 2005; 111: 250 â 3.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCella D, Yount S, Rothrock N, Gershon R, Cook K, Reeve B, et al. The Patientâ Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS): progress of an NIH Roadmap cooperative group during its first two years. Med Care 2007; 45: S3 â S11.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMayes MD. Systemic sclerosis. In: Klippel JH, Stone JH, Crofford LJ, White PH, editors. Primer on the rheumatic diseases. 13th ed. New York: Springer; 2008. p. 343 â 62.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFirestein GS, Kelley WN, Budd RC, Gabriel SE, McInnes IB, O’Dell JR, editors. Kelley’s textbook of rheumatology. 9th ed. Philadelphia: Saunders Elsevier; 2012.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMeier FM, Frommer KW, Dinser R, Walker UA, Czirjak L, Denton CP, et al. Update on the profile of the EUSTAR cohort: an analysis of the EULAR Scleroderma Trials and Research group database. Ann Rheum Dis 2012; 71: 1355 â 60.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKwakkenbos L, Jewett LR, Baron M, Bartlett SJ, Furst D, Gottesman K, et al. The Scleroderma Patientâ centered Intervention Network (SPIN) Cohort: protocol for a cohort multiple randomised controlled trial (cmRCT) design to support trials of psychosocial and rehabilitation interventions in a rare disease context. BMJ Open 2013; 3: e003563.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGalluccio F, Walker UA, Nihtyanova S, Moinzadeh P, Hunzelmann N, Krieg T, et al. Registries in systemic sclerosis: a worldwide experience. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2011; 50: 60 â 8.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEntin MA, Wilkinson RD. Scleroderma hand: a reappraisal. Orthop Clin North Am 1973; 4: 1031 â 8.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePoole JL. Musculoskeletal rehabilitation in the person with scleroderma. Curr Opin Rheumatol 2010; 22: 205 â 12.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBassel M, Hudson M, Taillefer SS, Schieir O, Baron M, Thombs BD. Frequency and impact of symptoms experienced by patients with systemic sclerosis: results from a Canadian National Survey. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2011; 50: 762 â 7.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKallen MA, Mayes MD, Kriseman YL, de Achaval SB, Cox VL, Suarezâ Almazor ME. The Symptom Burden Index: development and initial findings from use with patients with systemic sclerosis. J Rheumatol 2010; 37: 1692 â 8.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDuruöz MT, Poiraudeau S, Fermanian J, Menkes CJ, Amor B, Dougados M, et al. Development and validation of a rheumatoid hand functional disability scale that assesses functional handicap. J Rheumatol 1996; 23: 1167 â 72.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBrower LM, Poole JL. Reliability and validity of the Duruoz Hand Index in persons with systemic sclerosis (scleroderma). Arthritis Rheum 2004; 51: 805 â 9.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRannou F, Poiraudeau S, Berezné A, Baubet T, Leâ Guern V, Cabane J, et al. Assessing disability and quality of life in systemic sclerosis: construct validities of the Cochin Hand Function Scale, Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ), systemic sclerosis HAQ, and Medical Outcomes Study 36â item short form health survey. Arthritis Rheum 2007; 57: 94 â 102.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMouthon L, Carpentier PH, Lok C, Clerson P, Gressin V, Hachulla E, et al. Ischemic digital ulcers affect hand disability and pain in systemic sclerosis. J Rheumatol 2014; 41: 1317 â 23.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBongi SM, del Rosso A, Galluccio F, Tai G, Sigismondi F, Passalacqua M, et al. Efficacy of a tailored rehabilitation program for systemic sclerosis. Clin Exp Rheumatol 2009; 27: S44 â S50.
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
acr22893_am.pdf
Size:
385.7KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open
Name:
acr22893.pdf
Size:
201.4KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.