Show simple item record

Organizational factors and depression management in community-based primary care settings

dc.contributor.authorPost, Edward P
dc.contributor.authorKilbourne, Amy M
dc.contributor.authorBremer, Robert W
dc.contributor.authorSolano, Francis X
dc.contributor.authorPincus, Harold A
dc.contributor.authorReynolds, Charles F
dc.date.accessioned2016-12-05T09:57:04Z
dc.date.available2016-12-05T09:57:04Z
dc.date.issued2009-12-31
dc.identifier.citationImplementation Science. 2009 Dec 31;4(1):84
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-4-84
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/134542
dc.description.abstractAbstract Background Evidence-based quality improvement models for depression have not been fully implemented in routine primary care settings. To date, few studies have examined the organizational factors associated with depression management in real-world primary care practice. To successfully implement quality improvement models for depression, there must be a better understanding of the relevant organizational structure and processes of the primary care setting. The objective of this study is to describe these organizational features of routine primary care practice, and the organization of depression care, using survey questions derived from an evidence-based framework. Methods We used this framework to implement a survey of 27 practices comprised of 49 unique offices within a large primary care practice network in western Pennsylvania. Survey questions addressed practice structure (e.g., human resources, leadership, information technology (IT) infrastructure, and external incentives) and process features (e.g., staff performance, degree of integrated depression care, and IT performance). Results The results of our survey demonstrated substantial variation across the practice network of organizational factors pertinent to implementation of evidence-based depression management. Notably, quality improvement capability and IT infrastructure were widespread, but specific application to depression care differed between practices, as did coordination and communication tasks surrounding depression treatment. Conclusions The primary care practices in the network that we surveyed are at differing stages in their organization and implementation of evidence-based depression management. Practical surveys such as this may serve to better direct implementation of these quality improvement strategies for depression by improving understanding of the organizational barriers and facilitators that exist within both practices and practice networks. In addition, survey information can inform efforts of individual primary care practices in customizing intervention strategies to improve depression management.
dc.titleOrganizational factors and depression management in community-based primary care settings
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/134542/1/13012_2006_Article_855.pdf
dc.language.rfc3066en
dc.rights.holderPost et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
dc.date.updated2016-12-05T09:57:05Z
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.