Show simple item record

Negotiated control between the manual and visual systems for visually guided hand reaching movements

dc.contributor.authorKim, K H
dc.contributor.authorGillespie, R B
dc.contributor.authorMartin, Bernard J
dc.date.accessioned2016-12-05T10:12:19Z
dc.date.available2016-12-05T10:12:19Z
dc.date.issued2014-06-12
dc.identifier.citationJournal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation. 2014 Jun 12;11(1):102
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1743-0003-11-102
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/134579
dc.description.abstractAbstract Background Control of reaching movements for manual work, vehicle operation, or interactions with manual interfaces requires concurrent gaze control for visual guidance of the hand. We hypothesize that reaching movements are based on negotiated strategies to resolve possible conflicting demands placed on body segments shared by the visual (gaze) and manual (hand) control systems. Further, we hypothesize that a multiplicity of possible spatial configurations (redundancy) in a movement system enables a resolution of conflicting demands that does not require sacrificing the goals of the two systems. Methods The simultaneous control of manual reach and gaze during seated reaching movements was simulated by solving an inverse kinematics model wherein joint trajectories were estimated from a set of recorded hand and head movements. A secondary objective function, termed negotiation function, was introduced to describe a means for the manual reach and gaze directing systems to balance independent goals against (possibly competing) demands for shared resources, namely the torso movement. For both systems, the trade-off may be resolved without sacrificing goal achievement by taking advantage of redundant degrees of freedom. Estimated joint trajectories were then compared to joint movement recordings from ten participants. Joint angles were predicted with and without the negotiation function in place, and model accuracy was determined using the root-mean-square errors (RMSEs) and differences between estimated and recorded joint angles. Results The prediction accuracy was generally improved when negotiation was included: the negotiated control reduced RMSE by 16% and 30% on average when compared to the systems with only manual or visual control, respectively. Furthermore, the RMSE in the negotiated control system tended to improve with torso movement amplitude. Conclusions The proposed model describes how multiple systems cooperate to perform goal-directed human movements when those movements draw upon shared resources. Allocation of shared resources can be undertaken by a negotiation process that is aware of redundancies and the existence of multiple solutions within the individual systems.
dc.titleNegotiated control between the manual and visual systems for visually guided hand reaching movements
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/134579/1/12984_2012_Article_626.pdf
dc.language.rfc3066en
dc.rights.holderKim et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
dc.date.updated2016-12-05T10:12:20Z
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.