Show simple item record

Vitalum study design: RCT evaluating the efficacy of tailored print communication and telephone motivational interviewing on multiple health behaviors

dc.contributor.authorvan Keulen, Hilde M
dc.contributor.authorMesters, Ilse
dc.contributor.authorBrug, Johannes
dc.contributor.authorAusems, Marlein
dc.contributor.authorCampbell, Marci
dc.contributor.authorResnicow, Ken
dc.contributor.authorZwietering, Paul J
dc.contributor.authorvan Breukelen, Gerard
dc.contributor.authorvan Mechelen, Willem
dc.contributor.authorSeverens, Johan L
dc.contributor.authorde Vries, Hein
dc.date.accessioned2016-12-05T10:27:05Z
dc.date.available2016-12-05T10:27:05Z
dc.date.issued2008-06-19
dc.identifier.citationBMC Public Health. 2008 Jun 19;8(1):216
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-8-216
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/134604
dc.description.abstractAbstract Background A large proportion of adults fail to meet public health guidelines for physical activity as well as fruit, vegetable and fat intake. Interventions are needed to improve these health behaviors. Both computer tailoring and motivational interviewing have shown themselves to be promising techniques for health behavior change. The Vitalum project aims to compare the efficacy of these techniques in improving the health behaviors of adults aged 45–70. This paper describes the design of the Vitalum study. Methods/Design Dutch general medical practices (N = 23) were recruited via a registration network or by personal invitation. The participants were then enrolled through these general practices using an invitational letter. They (n = 2,881) received a written baseline questionnaire to assess health behaviors, and potential psychosocial and socio-demographic behavioral determinants. A power analysis indicated that 1,600 participants who were failing to meet the guidelines for physical activity and either fruit or vegetable consumption were needed. Eligible participants were stratified based on hypertension status and randomized into one of four intervention groups: tailored print communication, telephone motivational interviewing, combined, and control. The first two groups either received four letters or took part in four interviews, whereas the combined group received two letters and took part in two interviews in turns at 5, 13, 30 and 43 weeks after returning the baseline questionnaire. Each letter and interview focused on physical activity or nutrition behavior. The participants also took part in a telephone survey 25 weeks after baseline to gather new information for tailoring. There were two follow-up questionnaires, at 47 and 73 weeks after baseline, to measure short- and long-term effects. The control group received a tailored letter after the last posttest. The process, efficacy and cost-effectiveness of the interventions will be examined by means of multilevel mixed regression, cost-effectiveness analyses and process evaluation. Discussion The Vitalum study simultaneously evaluates the efficacy of tailored print communication and telephone motivational interviewing, and their combined use for multiple behaviors and people with different motivational stages and education levels. The results can be used by policymakers to contribute to evidence-based prevention of chronic diseases. Trial Registration Dutch Trial Register NTR1068
dc.titleVitalum study design: RCT evaluating the efficacy of tailored print communication and telephone motivational interviewing on multiple health behaviors
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/134604/1/12889_2008_Article_1186.pdf
dc.language.rfc3066en
dc.rights.holdervan Keulen et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
dc.date.updated2016-12-05T10:27:06Z
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.