View Item 

Show simple item record

Evaluating computer‐aided detection algorithms
dc.contributor.authorJun Yoon, Hong
dc.contributor.authorZheng, Bin
dc.contributor.authorSahiner, Berkman
dc.contributor.authorChakraborty, Dev P.
dc.date.accessioned2017-01-06T20:45:32Z
dc.date.available2017-01-06T20:45:32Z
dc.date.issued2007-06
dc.identifier.citationJun Yoon, Hong; Zheng, Bin; Sahiner, Berkman; Chakraborty, Dev P. (2007). "Evaluating computer‐aided detection algorithms." Medical Physics 34(6): 2024-2038.
dc.identifier.issn0094-2405
dc.identifier.issn2473-4209
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/134784
dc.publisherAmerican Association of Physicists in Medicine
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.
dc.subject.otherfree‐response
dc.subject.otherFROC curves
dc.subject.otherlesion localization
dc.subject.othersearch model
dc.subject.othermaximum likelihood
dc.subject.otherfigure of merit
dc.subject.otherimaging system optimization
dc.subject.otherMedical imaging
dc.subject.otherData sets
dc.subject.otherComputed tomography
dc.subject.otherComputer aided diagnosis
dc.subject.otherCancer
dc.subject.otherLungs
dc.subject.otherComputer software
dc.subject.othermammography
dc.subject.otherMammography
dc.subject.otherRadiologists
dc.subject.otherMammography
dc.subject.otherInterpolation; curve fitting
dc.subject.otherData analysis
dc.subject.othermedical diagnostic computing
dc.subject.otherdiagnostic radiography
dc.subject.othercurve fitting
dc.subject.othermaximum likelihood estimation
dc.subject.othersensitivity analysis
dc.subject.otherCAD evaluation
dc.titleEvaluating computer‐aided detection algorithms
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollow
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelMedicine (General)
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciences
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Reviewed
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15261
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15261
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/134784/1/mp6289.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1118/1.2736289
dc.identifier.sourceMedical Physics
dc.identifier.citedreferenceH. L. Kundel and C. F. Nodine, “ Modeling visual search during mammogram viewing,” Proc. SPIE PSISDG --> 0277‐786X --> 10.1117/12.538063 --> 5372, 110 – 115 ( 2004 ).
dc.identifier.citedreferenceL. A. Khoo, P. Taylor, and R. M. Given‐Wilson, “ Computer‐aided detection in the United Kingdom National Breast Screening Programme: Prospective study,” Radiology RADLAX --> 0033‐8419 --> 237, 444 – 449 ( 2005 ).
dc.identifier.citedreferenceR. M. Summers et al., “ Colonic polyps: Complementary role of computer‐aided detection in CT Colonography,” Radiology RADLAX --> 0033‐8419 --> 225, 391 – 399 ( 2002 ).
dc.identifier.citedreferenceK. Awai et al., “ Pulmonary nodules at chest CT: Effect of computer‐aided diagnosis on radiologists’ detection performance,” Radiology RADLAX --> 0033‐8419 --> 230, 347 – 352 ( 2004 ).
dc.identifier.citedreferenceC. E. Metz, “ Receiver operating characteristic analysis: A tool for the quantitative evaluation of observer performance and imaging systems,” J. Am. Coll. Radiol. 1546‐1440 --> 3, 413 – 422 ( 2006 ).
dc.identifier.citedreferenceP. C. Bunch et al., “ A free‐response approach to the measurement characterization of radiographic‐observer performance,” J. Appl. Photogr. Eng. JAPEDL --> 0098‐7298 --> 4, 166 – 171 ( 1978 ).
dc.identifier.citedreferenceD. P. Chakraborty et al., “ Digital and conventional chest imaging: A modified ROC study of observer performance using simulated nodules,” Radiology RADLAX --> 0033‐8419 --> 158, 35 – 39 ( 1986 ).
dc.identifier.citedreferenceD. P. Chakraborty, “ Maximum likelihood analysis of free‐response receiver operating characteristic (FROC) data,” Med. Phys. MPHYA6 --> 0094‐2405 --> 10.1118/1.596358 --> 16, 561 – 568 ( 1989 ).
dc.identifier.citedreferenceD. P. Chakraborty and K. S. Berbaum, “ Observer studies involving detection and localization: Modeling, analysis and validation,” Med. Phys. MPHYA6 --> 0094‐2405 --> 10.1118/1.1769352 --> 31, 2313 – 2330 ( 2004 ).
dc.identifier.citedreferenceB. Sahiner et al., “ Joint two‐view information for computerized detection of microcalcifications on mammograms,” Med. Phys. MPHYA6 --> 0094‐2405 --> 10.1118/1.2208919 --> 33, 2574 – 2585 ( 2006 ).
dc.identifier.citedreferenceB. Zheng et al., “ A multiview based computer aided detection scheme for breast masses,” Med. Phys. MPHYA6 --> 0094‐2405 --> 10.1118/1.2237476 --> 33, 3135 – 3143 ( 2006 ).
dc.identifier.citedreferenceR. Bellotti et al., “ A completely automated CAD system for mass detection in a large mammographic database,” Med. Phys. MPHYA6 --> 0094‐2405 --> 10.1118/1.2214177 --> 33, 3066 – 3075 ( 2006 ).
dc.identifier.citedreferenceD. P. Chakraborty, “ Statistical power in observer performance studies: A comparison of the ROC and free‐response methods in tasks involving localization,” Acad. Radiol. 1076‐6332 --> 9, 147 – 156 ( 2002 ).
dc.identifier.citedreferenceN. Petrick et al., “ Breast cancer detection: Evaluation of a mass‐detection algorithm for computer‐aided diagnosis—Experience in 263 patients,” Radiology RADLAX --> 0033‐8419 --> 224, 217 – 224 ( 2002 ).
dc.identifier.citedreferenceM. Penedo et al., “ Free‐response receiver operating characteristic evaluation of lossy JPEG2000 and object‐based set partitioning in hierarchical trees compression of digitized mammograms,” Radiology RADLAX --> 0033‐8419 --> 237, 450 – 457 ( 2005 ).
dc.identifier.citedreferenceH. Bornefalk, “ Estimation and comparison of CAD system performance in clinical settings,” Acad. Radiol. 1076‐6332 --> 12, 687 – 694 ( 2005 ).
dc.identifier.citedreferenceM. N. Gurcan et al., “ Optimal neural network architecture selection: Improvement in computerized detection of microcalcifications,” Acad. Radiol. 1076‐6332 --> 9, 420 – 429 ( 2002 ).
dc.identifier.citedreferenceH. Bornefalk and A. B. Hermansson, “ On the comparison of FROC curves in mammography CAD systems,” Med. Phys. MPHYA6 --> 0094‐2405 --> 10.1118/1.1844433 --> 32, 412 – 417 ( 2005 ).
dc.identifier.citedreferenceF. W. Samuelson and N. Petrick, 2006 IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Micro, Arlington, VA, 2006 (unpublished).
dc.identifier.citedreferenceD. C. Edwards et al., “ Maximum likelihood fitting of FROC curves under an initial‐detection‐and‐candidate‐analysis model,” Med. Phys. MPHYA6 --> 0094‐2405 --> 10.1118/1.1524631 --> 29, 2861 – 2870 ( 2002 ).
dc.identifier.citedreferenceB. Zheng et al., “ A comparison of two data analyses from two observer performance studies using jackknife ROC and JAFROC,” Med. Phys. MPHYA6 --> 0094‐2405 --> 10.1118/1.1884766 --> 32, 1031 – 1034 ( 2005 ).
dc.identifier.citedreferenceB. Zheng et al., “ Computer‐aided detection in mammography: An assessment of performance on current and prior images,” Acad. Radiol. 1076‐6332 --> 9, 1245 – 1250 ( 2002 ).
dc.identifier.citedreferenceH. L. Kundel and C. F. Nodine, “ A visual concept shapes image perception,” Radiology RADLAX --> 0033‐8419 --> 146, 363 – 368 ( 1983 ).
dc.identifier.citedreferenceC. F. Nodine and H. L. Kundel, “ Using eye movements to study visual search and to improve tumor detection,” Radiographics 0271‐5333 --> 7, 1241 – 1250 ( 1987 ).
dc.identifier.citedreferenceD. D. Dorfman and E. Alf, “ Maximum likelihood estimation of parameters of signal‐detection theory and determination of confidence intervals—Rating method data,” J. Math. Psychol. JMTPAJ --> 0022‐2496 --> 10.1016/0022‐2496(69)90019‐4 --> 6, 487 – 496 ( 1969 ).
dc.identifier.citedreferenceX. Pan and C. E. Metz, “ The proper binormal model: Parametric receiver operating characteristic curve estimation with degenerate data,” Acad. Radiol. 1076‐6332 --> 4, 380 – 389 ( 1997 ).
dc.identifier.citedreferenceD. D. Dorfman et al., “ Proper receiving operating characteristic analysis: The Bigamma model,” Acad. Radiol. 1076‐6332 --> 4, 138 – 149 ( 1997 ).
dc.identifier.citedreferenceC. E. Metz and X. Pan, “ Proper binormal ROC curves: Theory and maximum‐likelihood estimation,” J. Math. Psychol. JMTPAJ --> 0022‐2496 --> 10.1006/jmps.1998.1218 --> 43, 1 – 33 ( 1999 ).
dc.identifier.citedreferenceD. D. Dorfman and K. S. Berbaum, “ A contaminated binormal model for ROC data: Part II. A formal model,” Acad. Radiol. 1076‐6332 --> 7, 427 – 437 ( 2000 ).
dc.identifier.citedreferenceD. P. Chakraborty, “ A search model and figure of merit for observer data acquired according to the free‐response paradigm,” Phys. Med. Biol. PHMBA7 --> 0031‐9155 --> 10.1088/0031‐9155/51/14/012 --> 51, 3449 – 3462 ( 2006 ).
dc.identifier.citedreferenceD. P. Chakraborty, “ ROC curves predicted by a model of visual search,” Phys. Med. Biol. PHMBA7 --> 0031‐9155 --> 10.1088/0031‐9155/51/14/013 --> 51, 3463 – 3482 ( 2006 ).
dc.identifier.citedreferenceR. J. Larsen and M. L. Marx, An Introduction to Mathematical Statistics and Its Applications, 3rd ed. ( Prentice‐Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, 2001 ).
dc.identifier.citedreferenceA. Stuart, K. Ord, and S. Arnold, Kendall’s Advance Theory of Statistics: Classical Inference and the Linear Model, 6th ed. ( Oxford University Press, New York, 2004 ), Vol. 2A.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceW. H. Press et al., Numerical Recipes in C: The Art of Scientific Computing ( Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1988 ).
dc.identifier.citedreferenceM. Galassi et al., GNU Scientific Library Reference Manual, 1.6 ed. ( Network Theory, Bristol, 2005 ).
dc.identifier.citedreferenceR. Yuan, P. Vos, and P. L. Cooperberg, “ Computer‐aided detection in screening CT for pulmonary nodules,” Am. J. Roentgenol. AJROAM --> 0092‐5381 --> 186, 1280 – 1287 ( 2005 ).
dc.identifier.citedreferenceC. E. Metz, B. A. Herman, and J. H. Shen, “ Maximum‐likelihood estimation of ROC curves from continuously‐distributed data,” Stat. Med. 0277‐6715 --> 17, 1033 ( 1998 ).
dc.identifier.citedreferenceD. P. Chakraborty, SPIE Medical Imaging, Image Perception, Observer Performance, and Technology Assessment, San Diego, 2007 (unpublished).
dc.identifier.citedreferenceD. P. Chakraborty, H. J. Yoon, and C. Mello‐Thoms, “ Spatial localization accuracy of radiologists in free‐response studies: Inferring perceptual FROC curves from mark‐rating data,” Acad. Radiol. 1076‐6332 --> 14, 4 – 18 ( 2007 ).
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJ. A. Hanley, “ The robustness of the ‘binormal’ assumptions used in fitting ROC curves,” Med. Decis Making 0272‐989X --> 8, 197 – 203 ( 1988 ).
dc.identifier.citedreferenceB. Efron, The Jackknife, the Bootstrap and Other Resampling Plans ( Capital City, Montpelier, 1982 ).
dc.identifier.citedreferenceD. D. Dorfman, K. S. Berbaum, and C. E. Metz, “ ROC characteristic rating analysis: Generalization to the population of readers and patients with the jackknife method,” Invest. Radiol. INVRAV --> 0020‐9996 --> 10.1097/00004424‐199209000‐00015 --> 27, 723 – 731 ( 1992 ).
dc.identifier.citedreferenceS. V. Beiden, R. F. Wagner, and G. Campbell, “ Components‐of variance models and multiple‐bootstrap experiments: An alternative method for random‐effects, receiver operating characteristic analysis,” Acad. Radiol. 1076‐6332 --> 7, 341 – 349 ( 2000 ).
dc.identifier.citedreferenceE. L. Lehmann and G. Casella, Theory of Point Estimation, 2nd ed. ( Springer, New York, 1998 ).
dc.identifier.citedreferenceS. Brandt, Data Analysis: Statistical and Computational Methods for Scientists and Engineers, 3rd ed. ( Springer, New York, 1999 ).
dc.identifier.citedreferenceG. M. Brake, N. Karssemeijer, and J. H. Hendriks, “ Automated detection of breast carcinomas not detected in a screening program,” Radiology RADLAX --> 0033‐8419 --> 207, 465 – 471 ( 1998 ).
dc.identifier.citedreferenceR. L. Birdwell et al., “ Mammographic characteristics of 115 missed cancers later detected with screening mammography and the potential utility of computer‐aided detection,” Radiology RADLAX --> 0033‐8419 --> 219, 192 – 202 ( 2001 ).
dc.identifier.citedreferenceC. S. White et al., “ Primary carcinoma of the lung overlooked at CT: Analysis of findings in 14 patients,” Radiology RADLAX --> 0033‐8419 --> 199, 109 – 115 ( 1996 ).
dc.identifier.citedreferenceR. Kakinuma et al., “ Detection failures in spiral CT screening for lung cancer: Analysis of CT findings,” Radiology RADLAX --> 0033‐8419 --> 212, 61 – 66 ( 1999 ).
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJ. V. Forrest and P. J. Friedman, “ Radiologic errors in patients with lung cancer,” West. J. Med. WJMDA2 --> 0093‐0415 --> 134, 485 – 490 ( 1981 ).
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJ. R. Muhm et al., “ Lung cancer detected during a screening program using four‐month chest radiographs,” Radiology RADLAX --> 0033‐8419 --> 148, 609 – 615 ( 1983 ).
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJ. G. Fletcher et al., “ Optimization of CT colonography technique: Prospective trial in 180 patients,” Radiology RADLAX --> 0033‐8419 --> 216, 704 – 711 ( 2000 ).
dc.identifier.citedreferenceE. L. Thurfjell, K. A. Lernevall, and A. A. S. Taube, “ Benefit of independent double reading in a population‐based mammography screening program Radiology 1994; 191:241–244,” Radiology RADLAX --> 0033‐8419 --> 191, 241 – 244 ( 1994 ).
dc.identifier.citedreferenceD. Wormanns et al., “ Detection of pulmonary nodules at multirow‐detector CT: Effectiveness of double reading to improve sensitivity at standard‐dose and low‐dose chest CT,” Eur. Radiol. 0938‐7994 --> 15, 14 – 22 ( 2005 ).
dc.identifier.citedreferenceD. Gur et al., “ Changes in breast cancer detection and mammography recall rates after the introduction of a computer‐aided detection system,” J. Natl. Cancer Inst. JNCIEQ --> 0027‐8874 --> 96, 85 – 190 ( 2004 ).
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
mp6289.pdf
Size:
206.3KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.