View Item 

Show simple item record

Radiation dosimetry in digital breast tomosynthesis: Report of AAPM Tomosynthesis Subcommittee Task Group 223
dc.contributor.authorSechopoulos, Ioannis
dc.contributor.authorSabol, John M.
dc.contributor.authorBerglund, Johan
dc.contributor.authorBolch, Wesley E.
dc.contributor.authorBrateman, Libby
dc.contributor.authorChristodoulou, Emmanuel
dc.contributor.authorFlynn, Michael
dc.contributor.authorGeiser, William
dc.contributor.authorGoodsitt, Mitchell
dc.contributor.authorKyle Jones, A.
dc.contributor.authorLo, Joseph Y.
dc.contributor.authorMaidment, Andrew D. A.
dc.contributor.authorNishino, Kazuyoshi
dc.contributor.authorNosratieh, Anita
dc.contributor.authorRen, Baorui
dc.contributor.authorPaul Segars, W.
dc.contributor.authorVon Tiedemann, Miriam
dc.date.accessioned2017-01-06T20:46:19Z
dc.date.available2017-01-06T20:46:19Z
dc.date.issued2014-09
dc.identifier.citationSechopoulos, Ioannis; Sabol, John M.; Berglund, Johan; Bolch, Wesley E.; Brateman, Libby; Christodoulou, Emmanuel; Flynn, Michael; Geiser, William; Goodsitt, Mitchell; Kyle Jones, A.; Lo, Joseph Y.; Maidment, Andrew D. A.; Nishino, Kazuyoshi; Nosratieh, Anita; Ren, Baorui; Paul Segars, W.; Von Tiedemann, Miriam (2014). "Radiation dosimetry in digital breast tomosynthesis: Report of AAPM Tomosynthesis Subcommittee Task Group 223." Medical Physics 41(9): n/a-n/a.
dc.identifier.issn0094-2405
dc.identifier.issn2473-4209
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/134828
dc.publisherAmerican Association of Physicists in Medicine
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.
dc.subject.otherbreast cancer
dc.subject.otherMonte Carlo methods
dc.subject.otherMedical X‐ray imaging
dc.subject.otherX‐rays
dc.subject.otherDose‐volume analysis
dc.subject.otherDosimetry
dc.subject.otherMammography
dc.subject.otherbiological tissues
dc.subject.othercancer
dc.subject.otherdosimetry
dc.subject.othermammography
dc.subject.otherX‐ray imaging
dc.subject.otherbreast tomosynthesis
dc.subject.otherdosimetry
dc.subject.otherMonte Carlo
dc.subject.othermammography
dc.subject.othermean glandular dose
dc.subject.otherconversion factor
dc.subject.otherrelative glandular dose
dc.subject.otherBiological material, e.g. blood, urine; Haemocytometers
dc.subject.otherScintigraphy
dc.subject.otherDigital tomosynthesis mammography
dc.subject.otherDosimetry
dc.subject.otherX‐ray detectors
dc.subject.otherX‐ray spectra
dc.subject.otherTissues
dc.titleRadiation dosimetry in digital breast tomosynthesis: Report of AAPM Tomosynthesis Subcommittee Task Group 223
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollow
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelMedicine (General)
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciences
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Reviewed
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Radiology, University of Michigan, 1500 EastMedical Center Drive, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Radiology, University of Michigan, 1500 EastMedical Center Drive, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109
dc.contributor.affiliationotherBiomedical Engineering Graduate Group, Department of Radiology, Universityof California, Davis, California 95817
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartments of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Hematology and Medical Oncology andWinship Cancer Institute, Emory University, 1701 UppergateDrive Northeast, Suite 5018, Atlanta, Georgia 30322
dc.contributor.affiliationotherGE Healthcare, Global Diagnostic X‐Ray, Mailstop W‐701, 3000North Grandview Boulevard, Waukesha, Wisconsin 53188
dc.contributor.affiliationotherResearch and Development, Philips Womenˈs Healthcare, Solna,Sweden
dc.contributor.affiliationotherJ. Crayton Pruitt Family Department of Biomedical Engineering, Universityof Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32611
dc.contributor.affiliationotherUniversity of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32611
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Radiology, Henry Ford Health System, RadiologyResearch 2F, 1 Ford Place, Detroit, Michigan 48202
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Imaging Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson CancerCenter, Houston, Texas 77030‐4009
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Imaging Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson CancerCenter, Houston, Texas 77030
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Radiology, Medical Physics Graduate Program, and Department of BiomedicalEngineering, Carl E. Ravin Advanced Imaging Laboratories, DukeUniversity, Durham, North Carolina 27705
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104‐4206
dc.contributor.affiliationotherR & D X‐ray Products Group, Shimadzu Corporation, Tokyo,Japan
dc.contributor.affiliationotherHologic, Inc., 35 Crosby Drive, Bedford, Massachusetts01730
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Radiology, Medical Physics Graduate Program, and Department of BiomedicalEngineering, Carl E. Ravin Advanced Imaging Laboratories, DukeUniversity, Durham, North Carolina 27705
dc.contributor.affiliationotherPHILIPS Mammography Solutions, Solna, Sweden
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/134828/1/mp2600.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1118/1.4892600
dc.identifier.sourceMedical Physics
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJ. M. Boone, “ Normalized glandular dose (DgN) coefficients for arbitrary X‐ray spectra in mammography: Computer‐fit values of Monte Carlo derived data,” Med. Phys. 29, 869 – 875 ( 2002 ). 10.1118/1.1472499
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJ. M. Boone, “ Glandular breast dose for monoenergetic and high‐energy X‐ray beams: Monte Carlo assessment,” Radiology 213, 23 – 37 ( 1999 ). 10.1148/radiology.213.1.r99oc3923
dc.identifier.citedreferenceX. Wu, E. L. Gingold, G. T. Barnes, and D. M. Tucker, “ Normalized average glandular dose in molybdenum target‐rhodium filter and rhodium target‐rhodium filter mammography,” Radiology 193, 83 – 89 ( 1994 ). 10.1148/radiology.193.1.8090926
dc.identifier.citedreferenceG. R. Hammerstein, D. W. Miller, D. R. White, M. E. Masterson, H. Q. Woodard, and J. S. Laughlin, “ Absorbed radiation dose in mammography,” Radiology 130, 485 – 491 ( 1979 ). 10.1148/130.2.485
dc.identifier.citedreferenceD. R. Dance, “ The Monte Carlo calculation of integral radiation dose in xeromammography,” Phys. Med. Biol. 25, 25 – 37 ( 1980 ). 10.1088/0031‐9155/25/1/003
dc.identifier.citedreferenceD. R. Dance, “ Monte Carlo calculation of conversion factors for the estimation of mean glandular breast dose,” Phys. Med. Biol. 35, 1211 – 1219 ( 1990 ). 10.1088/0031‐9155/35/9/002
dc.identifier.citedreferenceX. Wu, G. T. Barnes, and D. M. Tucker, “ Spectral dependence of glandular tissue dose in screen‐film mammography,” Radiology 179, 143 – 148 ( 1991 ). 10.1148/radiology.179.1.2006265
dc.identifier.citedreferenceA. K. W. Ma, D. G. Darambara, A. Stewart, S. Gunn, and E. Bullard, “ Mean glandular dose estimation using MCNPX for a digital breast tomosynthesis system with tungsten/aluminum and tungsten/aluminum + silver x‐ray anode‐filter combinations,” Med. Phys. 35, 5278 – 5289 ( 2008 ). 10.1118/1.3002310
dc.identifier.citedreferenceD. R. Dance, K. C. Young, and R. E. van Engen, “ Estimation of mean glandular dose for breast tomosynthesis: Factors for use with the UK, European and IAEA breast dosimetry protocols,” Phys. Med. Biol. 56, 453 – 471 ( 2011 ). 10.1088/0031‐9155/56/2/011
dc.identifier.citedreferenceD. R. Dance, R. A. Hunt, P. R. Bakic, A. D. A. Maidment, M. Sandborg, G. Ullman, and G. Alm Carlsson, “ Breast dosimetry using high‐resolution voxel phantoms,” Radiat. Prot. Dosimetry 114, 359 – 363 ( 2005 ). 10.1093/rpd/nch510
dc.identifier.citedreferenceI. Sechopoulos, S. Suryanarayanan, S. Vedantham, C. D’Orsi, and A. Karellas, “ Computation of the glandular radiation dose in digital tomosynthesis of the breast,” Med. Phys. 34, 221 – 232 ( 2007 ). 10.1118/1.2400836
dc.identifier.citedreferenceI. Sechopoulos and C. J. D’Orsi, “ Glandular radiation dose in tomosynthesis of the breast using tungsten targets,” J. Appl. Clin. Med. Phys. 9, 161 – 171 ( 2008 ). 10.1120/jacmp.v9i4.2887
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJ. Allison et al., “ Geant4 developments and applications,” IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 53, 270 – 278 ( 2006 ). 10.1109/TNS.2006.869826
dc.identifier.citedreferenceS. Agostinelli et al., “ Geant4 ‐ A simulation toolkit,” Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 506, 250 – 303 ( 2003 ). 10.1016/S0168‐9002(03)01368‐8
dc.identifier.citedreferenceI. Sechopoulos, K. Bliznakova, X. Qin, B. Fei, and S. S. J. Feng, “ Characterization of the homogeneous tissue mixture approximation in breast imaging dosimetry,” Med. Phys. 39, 5050 – 5059 ( 2012 ). 10.1118/1.4737025
dc.identifier.citedreferenceI. Sechopoulos, “ A review of breast tomosynthesis. Part I. The image acquisition process,” Med. Phys. 40, 014301 (12pp.) ( 2013 ). 10.1118/1.4770279
dc.identifier.citedreferenceW. T. Sobol and X. Wu, “ Parametrization of mammography normalized average glandular dose tables,” Med. Phys. 24, 547 – 554 ( 1997 ). 10.1118/1.597937
dc.identifier.citedreferenceD. R. Dance, C. L. Skinner, K. C. Young, J. R. Beckett, and C. J. Kotre, “ Additional factors for the estimation of mean glandular breast dose using the UK mammography dosimetry protocol,” Phys. Med. Biol. 45, 3225 – 3240 ( 2000 ). 10.1088/0031‐9155/45/11/308
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJ. M. Boone, T. R. Fewell, and R. J. Jennings, “ Molybdenum, rhodium, and tungsten anode spectral models using interpolating polynomials with application to mammography,” Med. Phys. 24, 1863 – 1874 ( 1997 ). 10.1118/1.598100
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
mp2600.pdf
Size:
493.6KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.