View Item 

Show simple item record

The role of a biostatistical and epidemiologic review for a clinical journal
dc.contributor.authorVahratian, Anjel
dc.date.accessioned2017-01-10T19:03:42Z
dc.date.available2017-01-10T19:03:42Z
dc.date.issued2009-11
dc.identifier.citationVahratian, Anjel (2009). "The role of a biostatistical and epidemiologic review for a clinical journal." International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics 107(2): 91-92.
dc.identifier.issn0020-7292
dc.identifier.issn1879-3479
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/135200
dc.publisherLippincott Williams & Wilkins
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.
dc.titleThe role of a biostatistical and epidemiologic review for a clinical journal
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollow
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelObstetrics and Gynecology
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciences
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Reviewed
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan, USA
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/135200/1/ijgo91.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ijgo.2009.07.035
dc.identifier.sourceInternational Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJohnson T.M.. Tips on how to write a paper. J Am Acad Dermatol. 59, (6): 2008; 1064 – 1069
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRothman K.J., Greenland S., Poole C., Lash T.L.. Causation and causal inference. Rothman K., Greenland S., Lash T.. Modern Epidemiology. 3rd ed. 2008; Lippincott Williams & Wilkins: Philadelphia; 26 – 30
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHarris R.P., Helfand M., Woolf S.H., Lohr K.N., Mulrow C.D., Teutsch S.M., et al. Current methods of the US Preventive Services Task Force: a review of the process. Am J Prev Med. 20, (3 Suppl): 2001; 21 – 35
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGuyatt G.H., Oxman A.D., Vist G.E., Kunz R., Falck‐Ytter Y., Alonso‐Coello P., et al. GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ. 336, (7650): 2008; 924 – 926
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGreenhalgh T.. Assessing the methodological quality of published papers. BMJ. 315, (7103): 1997; 305 – 308
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
ijgo91.pdf
Size:
168.2KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.