View Item 

Show simple item record

Effect of a Gel Retainment Dam on Automated Ultrasound Coverage in a Dual‐Modality Breast Imaging System
dc.contributor.authorLi, Jie
dc.contributor.authorGoodsitt, Mitchell M.
dc.contributor.authorPadilla, Frederic
dc.contributor.authorFowlkes, J. Brian
dc.contributor.authorHooi, Fong Ming
dc.contributor.authorLashbrook, Christine R.
dc.contributor.authorThomenius, Kai E.
dc.contributor.authorCarson, Paul L.
dc.date.accessioned2017-01-10T19:05:23Z
dc.date.available2017-01-10T19:05:23Z
dc.date.issued2010-07
dc.identifier.citationLi, Jie; Goodsitt, Mitchell M.; Padilla, Frederic; Fowlkes, J. Brian; Hooi, Fong Ming; Lashbrook, Christine R.; Thomenius, Kai E.; Carson, Paul L. (2010). "Effect of a Gel Retainment Dam on Automated Ultrasound Coverage in a Dual‐Modality Breast Imaging System." Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine 29(7): 1075-1081.
dc.identifier.issn0278-4297
dc.identifier.issn1550-9613
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/135299
dc.publisherAmerican Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.
dc.subject.other3-dimensional imaging
dc.subject.otherautomated ultrasound
dc.subject.otherbreast cancer screening
dc.subject.othermultimodality
dc.titleEffect of a Gel Retainment Dam on Automated Ultrasound Coverage in a Dual‐Modality Breast Imaging System
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollow
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelMedicine (General)
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciences
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Reviewed
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Radiology, University of Michigan Health Systems, Ann Arbor, Michigan USA
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Ultrasound, Qilu Hospital, Shandong University, Jinan, China
dc.contributor.affiliationotherLaboratoire d’Imagerie Paramétrique, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Unité Mixte de Recherche 7623, Université Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris, France
dc.contributor.affiliationotherGE Global Research, Niskayuna, New York USA
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/135299/1/jum20102971075.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.7863/jum.2010.29.7.1075
dc.identifier.sourceJournal of Ultrasound in Medicine
dc.identifier.citedreferenceConway WF, Hayes CW, Brewer WH. Occult breast masses: use of a mammographic localizing grid for US evaluation. Radiology 1991; 181: 143 –146.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTaylor KJ, Merritt C, Piccoli C, et al. Ultrasound as a complement to mammography and breast examination to characterize breast masses. Ultrasound Med Biol 2002; 28: 19 –26.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJackson VP. The role of US in breast imaging. Radiology 1990; 177: 305 –311.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBerg WA, Blume JD, Cormack JB, et al. Combined screening with ultrasound and mammography vs mammography alone in women at elevated risk of breast cancer. JAMA 2008; 299: 2151 –2163.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMoss HA, Britton PD, Flower CDR, Freeman AH, Lomas DJ, Warren RM. How reliable is modern breast imaging in differentiating benign from malignant breast lesions in the symptomatic population? Clin Radiol 1999; 54: 676 –682.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBlane CE, Goodsitt MM, Grimm JC, et al. New compression paddle for wire localization in mammography. Acad Radiol 2010; 17: 142 –145.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceShipley JA, Duck FA, Goddard DA, et al. Automated quantitative volumetric breast ultrasound data-acquisition system. Ultrasound Med Biol 2005; 31: 905 –917.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKotsianos-Hermle D, Wirth S, Fischer T, Hiltawsky KM, Reiser M. First clinical use of a standardized three-dimensional ultrasound for breast Imaging. Eur J Radiol 2009; 71: 102 –108.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSinha SP, Roubidou MA, Helvie MA, et al. Multi-modality 3D breast imaging with X-ray tomosynthesis and automated ultrasound. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2007; 2007: 1335 –1338.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSinha SP, Goodsitt MM, Roubidoux MA, et al. Automated ultrasound scanning on a dual-modality breast imaging system: coverage and motion issues and solutions. J Ultrasound Med 2007; 26: 645 –655.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBooi RC, Krücker JF, Goodsitt MM, et al. Evaluating thin compression paddles for mammographically compatible ultrasound. Ultrasound Med Biol 2007; 33: 472 –482.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKapur A, Carson PL, Eberhard J, et al. Combination of digital mammography with semi-automated 3D breast ultrasound. Technol Cancer Res Treat 2004; 3: 325 –334.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStacey-Clear A, McCarthy KA, Hall DA, et al. Mammographically detected breast cancer: location in women under 50 years old. Radiology 1993; 186: 677 –680.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBerg WA. Rationale for a trial of screening breast ultrasound: American College of Radiology Imaging Network (ACRIN) 6666. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2003; 180: 1225 –1228.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKolb TM, Lichy J, Newhouse JH. Occult cancer in women with dense breasts: detection with screening US—diagnostic yield and tumor characteristics. Radiology 1998; 207: 191 –199.
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
jum20102971075.pdf
Size:
538.7KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.