View Item 

Show simple item record

Predicting deliverability of volumetric‐modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans using aperture complexity analysis
dc.contributor.authorYounge, Kelly C.
dc.contributor.authorRoberts, Don
dc.contributor.authorJanes, Lindsay A.
dc.contributor.authorAnderson, Carlos
dc.contributor.authorMoran, Jean M.
dc.contributor.authorMatuszak, Martha M.
dc.date.accessioned2017-01-10T19:05:27Z
dc.date.available2017-09-06T14:20:20Zen
dc.date.issued2016-07
dc.identifier.citationYounge, Kelly C.; Roberts, Don; Janes, Lindsay A.; Anderson, Carlos; Moran, Jean M.; Matuszak, Martha M. (2016). "Predicting deliverability of volumetric‐modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans using aperture complexity analysis." Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics 17(4): 124-131.
dc.identifier.issn1526-9914
dc.identifier.issn1526-9914
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/135304
dc.publisherVarian
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.
dc.subject.otherVMAT
dc.subject.otheroptimization
dc.subject.othercomplexity metric
dc.subject.otherpatient‐specific QA
dc.titlePredicting deliverability of volumetric‐modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans using aperture complexity analysis
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollow
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelMedicine (General)
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciences
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Reviewed
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/135304/1/acm20124.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1120/jacmp.v17i4.6241
dc.identifier.sourceJournal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMoran JM, Radawski J, Fraass BA. A dose gradient analysis tool for IMRT QA. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2005; 6 ( 2 ): 62 – 73.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDas IJ, Ding GX, Ahnesjö A. Small fields: nonequilibrium radiation dosimetry. Med Phys. 2008; 35 ( 1 ): 206 – 15.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceOliver M, Gagne I, Bush K, Zavgorodni S, Ansbacher W, Beckham W. Clinical significance of multi‐leaf collimator positional errors for volumetric modulated arc therapy. Radiother Oncol. 2010; 97 ( 3 ): 554 – 60.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCourt L, Wagar M, Berbeco R et al. Evaluation of the interplay effect when using RapidArc to treat targets moving in the craniocaudal or right‐left direction. Med Phys. 2010; 37 ( 1 ): 4 – 11.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceOtto K. Volumetric modulated arc therapy: IMRT in a single gantry arc. Med Phys. 2008; 35 ( 1 ): 310 – 17.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMasi L, Doro R, Favuzza V, Cipressi S, Livi L. Impact of plan parameters on the dosimetric accuracy of volumetric modulated arc therapy. Med Phys. 2013; 40 ( 7 ): 071718.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMcNiven AL, Sharpe MB, Purdie TG. A new metric for assessing IMRT modulation complexity and plan deliverability. Med Phys. 2010; 37 ( 2 ): 505 – 15.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAgnew CE, Irvine DM, McGarry CK. Correlation of phantom‐based and log file patient‐specific QA with complexity scores for VMAT. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2014; 15 ( 6 ): 4994.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGötstedt J, Karlsson Hauer A, Bäck A. Development and evaluation of aperture‐based complexity metrics using film and EPID measurements of static MLC openings. Med Phys. 2015; 42 ( 7 ): 3911 – 21.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceYounge KC, Matuszak MM, Moran JM, McShan DL, Fraass BA, Roberts DA. Penalization of aperture complexity in inversely planned volumetric modulated arc therapy. Med Phys. 2012; 39 ( 11 ): 7160 – 70.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVarian Medical Systems. Eclipse scripting API reference guide. Palo Alto, CA: Varian; 2011.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChen Y, Moran JM, Roberts DA, El‐Mohri Y, Antonuk LE, Fraass BA. Performance of a direct‐detection active matrix flat panel dosimeter (AMFPD) for IMRT measurements. Med Phys. 2007; 34 ( 12 ): 4911 – 22.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNelms BE, Chan MF, Jarry G et al. Evaluating IMRT and VMAT dose accuracy: practical examples of failure to detect systematic errors when applying a commonly used metric and action levels. Med Phys. 2013; 40 ( 11 ): 111722.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNilsson J, Hauer AK, Bäck A. IMRT patient‐specific QA using the Delta 4 dosimetry system and evaluation based on ICRU 83 recommendations. J Phys: Conf Ser. 2013; 444 ( 012048 ).
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMatuszak MM, Larsen EW, Fraass BA. Reduction of IMRT beam complexity through the use of beam modulation penalties in the objective function. Med Phys. 2007; 34 ( 2 ): 507 – 20.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSiochi RA, Molineu A, Orton CG. Point/Counterpoint. Patient‐specific QA for IMRT should be performed using software rather than hardware methods. Med Phys. 2013; 40 ( 7 ): 070601.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMoran JM, Dempsey M, Eisbruch A et al. Safety considerations for IMRT: executive summary. Med Phys. 2011; 38 ( 9 ): 5067 – 72.
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
acm20124.pdf
Size:
568.7KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.