View Item 

Show simple item record

American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine Recommendations for Contrast‐Enhanced Liver Ultrasound Imaging Clinical Trials
dc.contributor.authorGreenbaum, Lennard
dc.contributor.authorBurns, Peter
dc.contributor.authorCopel, Joshua
dc.contributor.authorCosgrove, David
dc.contributor.authorFowlkes, J. Brian
dc.contributor.authorGoldberg, Barry
dc.contributor.authorMattrey, Robert
dc.contributor.authorMerton, Daniel
dc.contributor.authorRobbin, Michelle
dc.contributor.authorWilson, Stephanie
dc.date.accessioned2017-01-10T19:05:29Z
dc.date.available2017-01-10T19:05:29Z
dc.date.issued2007-06
dc.identifier.citationGreenbaum, Lennard; Burns, Peter; Copel, Joshua; Cosgrove, David; Fowlkes, J. Brian; Goldberg, Barry; Mattrey, Robert; Merton, Daniel; Robbin, Michelle; Wilson, Stephanie (2007). "American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine Recommendations for Contrast‐Enhanced Liver Ultrasound Imaging Clinical Trials." Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine 26(6): 705-716.
dc.identifier.issn0278-4297
dc.identifier.issn1550-9613
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/135306
dc.publisherAmerican Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.
dc.titleAmerican Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine Recommendations for Contrast‐Enhanced Liver Ultrasound Imaging Clinical Trials
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollow
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelMedicine (General)
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciences
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Reviewed
dc.contributor.affiliationumUniversity of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, Michigan (J.B.F.)
dc.contributor.affiliationotherYale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut USA (J.C.)
dc.contributor.affiliationotherOrlando Regional Healthcare, Orlando, Florida USA (L.G.)
dc.contributor.affiliationotherSunnybrook Health Sciences Center, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (P.B.)
dc.contributor.affiliationotherHammersmith Hospital, London, England (D.C.)
dc.contributor.affiliationotherThomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania USA (B.G., D.M.)
dc.contributor.affiliationotherUniversity of California San Diego Medical Center, San Diego, California USA (R.M.)
dc.contributor.affiliationotherUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama USA (M.R.)
dc.contributor.affiliationotherUniversity of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (S.W.)
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/135306/1/jum2007266705.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.7863/jum.2007.26.6.705
dc.identifier.sourceJournal of Ultrasound in Medicine
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWible JH Jr, Galen KP, Wojdyla JK, Hughes MS, Klibanov AL, Brandenburger GH. Microbubbles induce renal hemorrhage when exposed to diagnostic ultrasound in anesthetized rats. Ultrasound Med Biol 2002; 28: 1535 –1546.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNiendorf HP, Haustein J, Cornelius I, Alhassan A, Claus W. Safety of gadolinium-DTPA: extended clinical experience. Magn Reson Med 1991; 22: 222 –228.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKobayashi N, Yasu T, Yamada S, et al. Endothelial cell injury in venule and capillary induced by contrast ultrasonography. Ultrasound Med Biol 2002; 28: 949 –956.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMiller DL, Gies RA. Gas-body-based contrast agent enhances vascular bioeffects of 1.09 MHz ultrasound on mouse intestine. Ultrasound Med Biol 1998; 24: 1201 –1208.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLi P, Armstrong WR, Miller DL. Impact of myocardial contrast echocardiography on vascular permeability: comparison of three different contrast agents. Ultrasound Med Biol 2004; 30: 83 –91.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAmerican Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine. Mechanical bioeffects from diagnostic ultrasound: AIUM consensus statements. J Ultrasound Med 2000; 19: 69 –72.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAmerican Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine. American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine Consensus Conference on Bioeffects of Diagnostic Ultrasound, 2005. J Ultrasound Med. In press.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKillam AL, Greener Y, McFerran BA, et al. Lack of bioeffects of ultrasound energy after intravenous administration of FS069 (Optison) in the anesthetized rabbit. J Ultrasound Med 1998; 17: 349 –356.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAy T, Havauz X, Van Camp G, et al. Destruction of contrast microbubbles by ultrasound effects on myocardial function, coronary perfusion pressure and microvascular integrity. Circulation 2001; 104: 461 –466.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChen S, Kroll MH, Shohet RV, Frenkel P, Mayer SA, Grayburn PA. Bioeffects of myocardial contrast microbubble destruction by echocardiography. Echocardiography 2002; 19: 495 –500.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLi P, Cao LQ, Dou CY, Armstrong WR, Miller DL. Impact of myocardial contrast echocardiography on vascular permeability: an in vivo dose response study of delivery mode, ultrasound power and contrast dose. Ultrasound Med Biol 2003; 29: 1341 –1349.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKobayashi N, Yasu T, Yamada S, et al. Influence of contrast ultrasonography with perflutren lipid microspheres on microvessel injury. Circ J 2003; 67: 630 –636.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTsutsui JM, Elhendy A, Xie F, O’Leary EL, McGrain AC, Porter TR. Safety of dobutamine stress real-time myocardial contrast echocardiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005; 45: 1235 –1242.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTimperley J, Mitchell AR, Thibault H, Mirza IH, Becher H. Safety of contrast dobutamine stress echocardiography: a single center experience. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2005; 18: 163 –167.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRaisinghani A, Wei KS, Crouse L, et al. Myocardial contrast echocardiography (MCE) with triggered ultrasound does not cause premature ventricular complexes: evidence from PB127 MCE studies. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2003; 16: 1037 –1042.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBorges AC, Walde T, Reibis RK, et al. Does contrast echocardiography with Optison induce myocardial necrosis in humans? J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2002; 15: 1080 –1086.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVan der Wouw P, Brauns AC, Bailey SE, Powers JE, Wilde AA. Premature ventricular contractions during triggered imaging with ultrasound contrast. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2000; 13: 288 –294.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMiller DL, Li P, Gordon D, Armstrong WF. Histological characterization of microlesions induced by myocardial contrast echocardiography. Echocardiography 2005; 22: 25 –34.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMiller DL, Li P, Armstrong WF. The effect of time and of vasoactive drugs on capillary leakage induced during myocardial contrast echocardiography. Echocardiography 2004; 21: 125 –132.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJakobsen JÅ, Oyen R, Thomsen HS, Morcos SK, Members of the Contrast Media Safety Committee of the European Society of Urogenital Radiology. Safety of ultrasound contrast agents. Eur Radiol 2005; 15: 941 –945.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCochran ST. Anaphylactoid reactions to radiocontrast media. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep 2005; 5: 28 –31.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMiller DL, Dou C. Contrast-aided diagnostic ultrasound does not enhance lung metastasis in a mouse melanoma tumor model. J Ultrasound Med 2005; 24: 349 –354.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceShigeta K, Itoh K, Ookawara S, Taniguchi N, Omoto K. Endothelial cell injury and platelet aggregation induced by contrast ultrasonography in the rat hepatic sinusoid. J Ultrasound Med 2004; 23: 29 –36.
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
jum2007266705.pdf
Size:
107.7KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.