Show simple item record

Evaluation of a simulation‐based curriculum for implementing a new clinical protocol

dc.contributor.authorMarzano, David
dc.contributor.authorSmith, Roger
dc.contributor.authorMhyre, Jill M.
dc.contributor.authorSeagull, F. Jacob
dc.contributor.authorCurran, Diana
dc.contributor.authorBehrmann, Sydney
dc.contributor.authorPriessnitz, Kristina
dc.contributor.authorHammoud, Maya
dc.date.accessioned2017-01-10T19:06:54Z
dc.date.available2018-02-01T14:56:11Zen
dc.date.issued2016-12
dc.identifier.citationMarzano, David; Smith, Roger; Mhyre, Jill M.; Seagull, F. Jacob; Curran, Diana; Behrmann, Sydney; Priessnitz, Kristina; Hammoud, Maya (2016). "Evaluation of a simulation‐based curriculum for implementing a new clinical protocol." International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics 135(3): 333-337.
dc.identifier.issn0020-7292
dc.identifier.issn1879-3479
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/135397
dc.description.abstractObjectiveTo evaluate the implementation of a new clinical protocol utilizing on‐unit simulation for team training.MethodsA prospective observational study was performed at the obstetrics unit of Von Voightlander Women’s Hospital, Michigan, USA, between October 1, 2012 to April 30, 2013. All members of the labor and delivery team were eligible for participation. Traditional education methods and in‐situ multi‐disciplinary simulations were used to educate labor and delivery staff. Following each simulation, participants responded to a survey regarding their experience. To evaluate the effect of the interventions, paging content was analyzed for mandated elements and adherence to operating room entry‐time tracking was examined.ResultsIn total, 51 unique individuals participated in 12 simulations during a 6‐month period. Simulation was perceived as a valuable activity and paging content improved. Following the intervention, the inclusion of a goal time for reaching the operation room increased from 7% to 61% of pages and the proportion of patients entering to operating room within 10 minutes of the stated goal increased from 67% to 85%.ConclusionThe training program was well received, and the accuracy of the communication and the goal set for reaching the operating room improved.
dc.publisherAmerican College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.
dc.subject.otherCesarean delivery urgency classification
dc.subject.otherSimulation
dc.subject.otherProtocol implementation
dc.subject.otherObstetrics
dc.titleEvaluation of a simulation‐based curriculum for implementing a new clinical protocol
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollow
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelObstetrics and Gynecology
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciences
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Reviewed
dc.contributor.affiliationumUniversity of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
dc.contributor.affiliationotherUniversity of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas, USA
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/135397/1/ijgo333.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ijgo.2016.06.022
dc.identifier.sourceInternational Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics
dc.identifier.citedreferenceThe Joint Commission. Sentinel Event Data. Root Causes by Event Type 2004–June 2013 http://www.medleague.com/wp‐content/uploads/2013/11/Root_Causes_by_Event_Type_2004‐2Q2013.pdf, Published 2013. Accessed August 22, 2016
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLucas D.N., Yentis S.M., Kinsella S.M., Holdcroft A., May A.E., Wee M., et al. Urgency of caesarean section: a new classification. J R Soc Med. 93 (7): 2000; 346 – 350
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAmerican College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Practice bulletin no. 116: Management of intrapartum fetal heart rate tracings. Obstet Gynecol. 116 (5): 2010; 1232 – 1240
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAmerican College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Standards for obstetric‐gynecologic services. Sixth edition. 1985; American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists: Washington, DC American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Standards for Obstetrics and Gynecologic Services. Sixth ed.. 1988; The College: Washington DC
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGum L., Greenhill J., Dix K.. Clinical simulation in maternity (CSiM): interprofessional learning through simulation team training. Qual Saf Health Care. 19 (5): 2010 e19
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAndreatta P., Frankel J., Boblick Smith S., Bullough A., Marzano D.. Interdisciplinary team training identifies discrepancies in institutional policies and practices. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 205 (4): 2011; 298 – 301
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAndreatta P., Marzano D.. Healthcare management strategies: interdisciplinary team factors. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 24 (6): 2012; 445 – 452
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAmerican College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Committee on Patient Safety and Quality Improvement. ACOG Committee Opinion No. 487: Preparing for clinical emergencies in obstetrics and gynecology. Obstet Gynecol. 117 (4): 2011; 1032 – 1034
dc.identifier.citedreferenceArgani C.H., Eichelberger M., Deering S., Satin A.J.. The case for simulation as part of a comprehensive patient safety program. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 206 (6): 2012; 451 – 455
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSexton J.B., Helmreich R.L., Neilands T.B., Rowan K., Vella K., Boyden J., et al. The Safety Attitudes Questionnaire: psychometric properties, benchmarking data, and emerging research. BMC Health Serv Res. 6: 2006; 44
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDaniels K., Arafeh J., Clark A., Waller S., Druzin M., Chueh J.. Prospective randomized trial of simulation versus didactic teaching for obstetrical emergencies. Simul Healthc. 5 (1): 2010; 40 – 45
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSevdalis N., Hull L., Birnbach D.J.. Improving patient safety in the operating theatre and perioperative care: obstacles, interventions, and priorities for accelerating progress. Br J Anaesth. 109 (Suppl 1): 2012; i3 – i16
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMcIvor W., Burden A., Weinger M.B., Steadman R.. Simulation for maintenance of certification in anesthesiology: the first two years. J Contin Educ Health Prof. 32 (4): 2012; 236 – 242
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAgency for Healthcare Research and Quality. TeamSTEPPS Essentials Instructional Module and Course Slides http://www.ahrq.gov/professionals/education/curriculum‐tools/teamstepps/instructor/essentials/index.html, Published 2014. Accessed August 22, 2016
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAmerican College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 106: Intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring: nomenclature, interpretation, and general management principles. Obstet Gynecol. 114 (1): 2009; 192 – 202
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBrennand J.E., Millns P., Yentis S., Hinshaw H.K.. Classification of Urgency of Caesarean Section – a Continuum of Risk (Good Practice No. 11). 2010; Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists: London
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.